This paper applies Lawrence Kohlberg's model of moral development to real-life behavioral observations of a six-year-old child. Drawing on Kohlberg's three levels — Pre-Conventional, Conventional, and Post-Conventional — the author examines how the child moves fluidly between Stage 1 (obedience and punishment avoidance), Stage 2 (exchange of favors), and Stage 3 (the "good boy/girl" orientation). Concrete examples, such as the child's white lie after drawing on walls, illustrate how residual Stage 1 reasoning coexists with emerging Stage 2 empathy and Stage 3 social awareness. The paper demonstrates that moral development is not strictly linear and that even young children can exhibit reasoning associated with more advanced stages.
Kohlberg's model of moral development describes six stages of moral reasoning that explain the motives behind human behavior and decisions. These six stages are organized into three broader levels: Pre-Conventional, Conventional, and Post-Conventional morality. Although individuals typically progress through the stages in sequence, a person may sometimes remain fixed at one stage throughout life.
A six-year-old child offers a compelling real-world illustration of this model. As a young boy, he moves fluidly between Pre-Conventional, Conventional, and even Post-Conventional reasoning depending on the situation. While he operates primarily at Level I (Pre-Conventional) moral reasoning, he occasionally exhibits a level of maturity associated with Level III (Post-Conventional) morality — a stage that many adults never fully reach. Most of the time, however, he functions at either Stage 2 ("Exchange of Favors") or Stage 3 (the "Good Boy/Girl" orientation) in Kohlberg's framework.
During his most childish moments, the child falls back on Stage 1 reasoning in Kohlberg's model. At this stage, behavior is motivated primarily by the desire for reward or the avoidance of punishment. A clear example occurred when he drew on the walls of his home. When asked whether he was responsible, he said "No" — even though he is the only child in the household. This white lie reflects classic Stage 1 logic: deny wrongdoing to escape consequences.
That said, his Stage 1 reasoning appears to be residual rather than dominant. He is growing and maturing, and his behavior increasingly reflects the more advanced stages of moral development.
The child most frequently operates at Stage 2, which Kohlberg associates with an exchange of favors. At this level, moral reasoning is still largely self-interested — decisions are evaluated based on how their outcomes will affect him personally. Nevertheless, Stage 2 represents meaningful moral growth: the child has begun to recognize that his actions affect other people, and he shows genuine empathy when he notices that someone else is suffering. This capacity for empathy marks an important transition away from purely egocentric thinking.
"Child recognizes social expectations and good behavior"
At his most mature, the child demonstrates reasoning that approaches Post-Conventional morality — a level at which principles of fairness and justice take precedence over personal gain or social conformity. This observation underscores a key insight from Kohlberg's model: moral development is not a strictly linear process. A child can simultaneously exhibit reasoning from multiple stages, and early signs of advanced moral thinking can appear well before adulthood. Observing this child across different situations reveals that moral development is dynamic, context-dependent, and ongoing.
You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.