This paper examines Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri's theoretical framework of "Empire" and "Multitude" as presented in their landmark work Empire. It traces the historical evolution of these concepts from national-scale rulership to a globalized dynamic, exploring how capital flows, labor migration, and demands for global citizenship have transformed the traditional empire structure. The paper argues that the multitude's collective power — expressed through labor, movement, and civic demands — has shifted control away from centralized imperial authority, reducing the empire to a maintenance function within a new, interactive global democracy shaped by the multitude itself.
For Hardt and Negri, the concepts of the "Multitude" and "Empire" share an interrelationship in terms of the world order of any era. Indeed, the concepts function in concomitance, bringing about a viable order according to which nations live during a given era in history — and also today.
Historically, the concept of the multitude functioned nationally: the majority of citizens create a national empire to rule them according to their vision of what such rulership should entail. For each country, rulership occurred on a differential basis, with each citizenry either rebelling against or accepting — and thus forming — the empire concept of their ideal. The empire also responds to the demands and needs of the multitude it rules by modifying its governance to satisfy the multitude. An unsatisfied multitude rebels or objects, demanding further modification.
It is therefore a dynamic relationship between entities, in which one satisfies the demands of the other according to the ideals and values of the culture and the time.
In Empire, however, the authors note that the multitude and empire concepts today manifest themselves on a much larger scale than had previously been the case (p. 400). Indeed, the multitude and empire now function on a global scale, with citizens from all countries demanding the privileges and rights of global citizenry.
"Labor migration and citizenship rights reshape empire"
"Multitude's collective agency displaces imperial control"
This dynamic, according to the authors, leads to an interactive democracy between the multitude and the empire. The multitude controls production and labor in order to meet the needs of the global citizen in a mutually beneficial manner. By association, the needs of the empire are met by a multitude that satisfactorily fulfills the needs within itself. The power of control previously belonging to the empire has now shifted to the multitude. The empire in its current form exists only as a maintenance mechanism for the world order, implementing rules and regulations as decided by the multitude. According to the authors (p. 410), the traditional form of empire is in the last stages of its demise — not only undermined but also reformed by the new, globalized dynamic of the multitude.
You’re 51% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.