This paper presents a balanced analysis of drug legalization debates in the United States. It examines the primary arguments in favor of legalization, including substantial government cost savings (estimated at $41.3 billion annually), reduced prison populations, and elimination of black market activity. The paper then addresses key counterarguments, particularly concerns about increased drug use, impaired driving, and public safety. Finally, it presents the author's position that decriminalization offers a more effective and moral approach than the current "War on Drugs," supported by evidence from countries with legalization policies and potential benefits for both drug users and the general public.
Most arguments for legalization of drugs are based on the pragmatic reality that it is difficult or impossible to legislate morality. Drug use has always been part of society, and even though it may not be socially desirable, there are many benefits that can be gained through legalization. One primary benefit is definitely financial. In a study by the Cato Institute, the report estimates that drug legalization would reduce government expenditure by approximately $41.3 billion annually. Roughly $25.7 billion of this savings would accrue to state and local governments, and roughly $15.6 billion to the federal government. Of these savings, approximately $8.7 billion would result from legalization of marijuana, $20 billion from legalization of cocaine and heroin, and $12.6 billion from legalization of all other drugs (Miron & Waldock, 2010).
There are many other benefits beyond financial savings as well. The United States has an expensive and dysfunctional prison system that has been shown to be ineffective on many levels. Legalization has the potential to drastically reduce the prison population, which would save taxpayers money. Regulating substances would also reduce black market activity and associated criminal enterprises. Additionally, drug legalization would be popular with the majority of the public. The "War on Drugs" and its related spending has been so unpopular that President Obama was actually the first president who stopped referring to the criminalization of people for drug charges as the "War on Drugs".
There are many arguments made against the legalization of drugs. Marijuana legalization has been at the forefront of the controversy since it is not as damaging as other drugs and has been shown to have health benefits for some conditions. However, the Rand Corporation stated that it believes marijuana use could double in California if legalization passes due to dramatically reduced prices and increased social acceptance, which in turn might increase various health risks, including increased heart rate, anxiety, and incidents of drug-impaired driving (Ghosh, 2010).
Making drugs more accepted and available in society will likely have the greatest impacts on public safety, particularly on the roads. It has been argued that legalization policies will result in an increase in impaired driving and traffic fatalities. Studies of marijuana's effects show that the drug can slow decision-making, decrease peripheral vision, and impede multitasking, all of which are critical driving skills (Lowy, 2014). Some have argued that people under the influence of marijuana typically drive slower and are safer than people under the influence of alcohol. However, there are many incidents of fatalities on the road directly related to marijuana and its effects on drivers. The fatalities likely to occur through increased availability and acceptance of drugs like marijuana constitute one of the critical factors to consider before legalizing drugs. Not legalizing drugs will keep roadways safer for all citizens.
"Decriminalization as effective moral policy"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.