This paper examines the relative strengths and weaknesses of interviews and surveys as primary research tools. It discusses how interviews allow for clarification, deeper probing, and flexible follow-up, while surveys offer lower cost, easier administration, and the ability to reach statistically valid sample sizes. The paper argues in favor of surveys for practical research, emphasizing precise question wording, mixed question formats (including Likert scale and open-ended items), manual data collection for smaller samples, and the use of Excel or SPSS for statistical analysis. Together, these considerations outline a practical framework for designing and conducting an effective survey-based study.
Interviews can be incredibly valuable research tools, but there are definite problems associated with them. In an interview, there is an opportunity to clarify questions — if the respondent needs clarification, it can be obtained on the spot, which is unlike most other forms of research. The interviewer can also encourage participation, and there is the opportunity for deeper probing of a subject. However, the interview could lead or bias the interviewee, skewing the results. Additionally, the presence of an interviewer may make the respondent either more open or less open, depending on the subject matter, the overall context, and the personalities involved.
Surveys have notable merits as well. They are easier to administer and less time-consuming, so the cost per response is usually much lower than for interviews. However, surveys tend to have a fairly low response rate, and many times a survey risks falling below the threshold for statistical validity. There is also less opportunity to clarify questions, so careful attention must be paid to wording. In sum, there is a clear trade-off between interviews and surveys — though both methods can deliver in-depth answers if used correctly.
For expedience, a survey is the preferred approach. First, a survey allows for precise crafting of questions, whereas in an interview there is the risk of getting off track. Furthermore, gathering a large number of responses is important for quantitative research: when working with quantitative results, it is essential to emphasize the need for a statistically valid sample size, and the survey format supports that goal more readily than interviews.
"Using mixed question formats for flexible survey design"
"Manual collection and Excel or SPSS for analysis"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.