This paper compares two peer-reviewed nursing studies that examine burnout and related workplace challenges using different research designs. The first study, by Van Oostveen, Mathijssen, and Vermeulen (2015), employs a qualitative approach—using focus groups and interviews—to explore nurses' perceptions of staffing and overwork. The second, by Allen, Holland, and Reynolds (2015), uses a quantitative design—surveys, Likert-scale measurement, and hierarchical regression analysis—to examine the relationship between workplace bullying and burnout. The paper explains why each design suits its respective research purpose, evaluates both studies on the basis of validity, reliability, and methodological appropriateness, and provides a rationale for selecting the peer-reviewed journals in which the studies were published.
Burnout is a common and serious problem in nursing, closely related to high turnover rates and low job satisfaction among nursing staff (Khamisa, Oldenburg, Peltzer & Ilic, 2015). The two peer-reviewed studies examined in this paper address that problem from different methodological perspectives — one qualitative and one quantitative — offering complementary insights into the workplace challenges nurses face.
The study by Van Oostveen, Mathijssen, and Vermeulen (2015) is characterized as qualitative because its primary objective was to obtain more in-depth insight into the experiences and perceptions of nurses regarding nurse overwork. This is a defining characteristic of qualitative research: rather than testing a hypothesis or identifying a correlation among variables, it seeks to better understand a phenomenon or gain insight into the subjective experience of a group.
Instead of statistical analysis, the qualitative study typically identifies themes or factors that help researchers obtain deeper knowledge of what is most impactful regarding a specific issue. To collect data, the researchers conducted focus groups and interviews — common qualitative methods that provide participants with opportunities to speak at length and share a great deal of information in their own terms. This allows researchers to understand the participants' perspectives in detail. For a qualitative study, it is essential that researchers gather as much information from participants as possible, making interview and focus group methods well-suited to that aim.
The study by Allen, Holland, and Reynolds (2015) is characterized as quantitative because it examines the correlation between two variables: bullying and burnout in the nursing field. The researchers used a survey method to obtain data from 762 nurses, and data was quantified using the Likert scale. Researchers then applied hierarchical regression analysis to test two hypotheses once the data were obtained.
In this manner, the researchers were able to produce quantifiable data — statistical and empirical evidence — that allowed them to determine whether to support or reject their hypotheses based on whether the data showed statistically significant correlations between the variables tested. This kind of study design and method is typical of quantitative research.
"Validity, reliability, and methodological fit criteria"
"Peer-reviewed journals and author transparency"
You’re 45% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.