This paper critically examines whether American prisons still function as the correctional and rehabilitation facilities they are intended to be. Drawing on Bureau of Justice Statistics data, criminological research, and sociological analysis, the paper evaluates the four stated purposes of incarceration — deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution — against documented realities including racial disparities in imprisonment, high recidivism rates, prisoners' exposure to criminal networks, and collateral harms such as increased disease risk and family disruption. The paper argues that, contrary to the assumption that incarceration corrects behavior, prisons frequently entrench criminal identities rather than reform them, and calls for systemic reforms including psychiatric services, education programs, and the correction of racial bias in law enforcement.
Mass imprisonment inflicts societal and individual harm in ways researchers have only just begun examining. Despite continued reductions in offending rates, America reports the world's highest imprisonment rate (The Conversation, 2016). Figures for the year 2015, for instance, reveal that Chicago prisoners served the equivalent of 218 additional years in pretrial detention compared to the sentences eventually awarded to them. Black Americans account for almost one million of the overall 2.3 million prisoners, with their imprisonment rates being nearly six times that of White Americans. Research reveals that prisoners' children perform poorly academically and display problem behavior (Cole, 33). It might be assumed that release from detention would offer the inmate a chance to become a productive citizen and return to a life of normalcy. However, imprisonment has been associated with susceptibility to illness, early death, and an increased likelihood of becoming a cigarette smoker (The Conversation). Furthermore, scholars largely focus on collateral damage while overlooking the lived experiences of formerly incarcerated individuals.
Thesis: Against the common assumption that imprisonment brings correctional advantages to prisoners, arguments supporting the opposite have been substantiated.
Imprisonment apparently serves four key goals: deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution (Prisons, 2017). Deterrence ensures that offenders are dissuaded from perpetrating future offenses by making both offenders and other members of society fear the consequences of breaking the law. Incapacitation neutralizes the offender by detaching them from the general population, thereby preventing the commission of additional crimes. Rehabilitation attempts to transform the prisoner by altering their mindset and conduct so that further offending does not occur (Prisons, 2017). Lastly, retribution is grounded in the idea that crime victims, or their family and friends, will not seek personal revenge if the criminal justice system metes out appropriate punishment.
Carson and Anderson (33) provide an intriguing statistical analysis of U.S. imprisonment. Race-based data as of 2015 indicate that prisons house roughly 523,000 Black inmates, 499,400 White inmates, and 319,400 Latino or Hispanic inmates. One way to interpret these figures would be to conclude that Black Americans are more likely to violate laws than White Americans. An alternative interpretation, however, considers the well-established fact that law enforcement officers disproportionately target Black Americans. Zack's (2015) analysis of racial profiling identifies this disparity as a reality that Americans contend with on a daily basis.
"Prisons fail rehabilitation; recidivism and criminal networks"
"Reform efforts, systemic injustice, and need for balance"
Can a balance be found? One may reasonably argue that prisoners deserve the difficult consequences of their offenses. However, does incarceration justify increased disease risk, early death, and a higher probability of developing a smoking habit? Most certainly not. Are law enforcement practices racially biased? Certainly. Is access to fairness in the justice system a privilege of the affluent? Often, yes. While it is fair to assert that offenders are deserving of appropriate retribution, this should not come at the cost of their health and lives. A balance is imperative.
Nobody likes the idea of an inmate completing their prison sentence and returning to society more dangerous than before. Correctional services must be reformed in order to achieve the intended goal of criminal rehabilitation and to prepare prisoners for successful reintegration into society as law-abiding citizens. Psychiatric evaluation and life-skills training may be part of the answer. That said, the injustices perpetuated by judicial and law enforcement authorities must also be addressed.
You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.