This paper examines organ donation through ethical, bioethical, and social lenses. It opens with a real-world narrative of a grieving mother persuaded to donate her daughter's organs, then surveys the deontological debates over definitions of life and death pioneered by scholars such as Paul Ramsey and Leon Kass. The paper addresses living-donor ethics, cloning, xenotransplantation, black market organ trade, and exploitation of donors in developing countries. It also outlines the bioethical criteria that must be met for a morally acceptable donation and concludes with a call to action, noting that over 95,000 people in the United States were awaiting transplants and that nearly 6,000 died waiting in 2006 alone.
What if you could extend another person's life — would you do it, even if it meant risking your own? Organ donation is the removal of specific tissues of the human body for transplanting or grafting into another person. Both cadavers and living persons can serve as donors, but both must fulfill certain criteria to be eligible. Bioethics, politics, and personal issues have all arisen in connection with organ donation.
At a New York address, a nine-year-old girl named Tiffany was pronounced brain dead. Her mother, Surangni Gunaratne, was devastated. Over the following days, hospital staff helped her come to terms with the loss of her child. Kathleen Atkinson, who worked for the New York Organ Donor Network, was the most persistent among them. She persuaded Tiffany's parents to donate their daughter's liver and kidneys, ultimately saving the lives of three strangers.2
A unique ethical dilemma arises from organ donation by living donors. Physicians must risk the life of a healthy person to save or improve the life of a patient, and transplantation surgeons have therefore been cautious in using this resource.3 Bioethics, a field that has been at the forefront of modern clinical science since the mid-1970s, addresses these concerns directly. Deontological issues, pioneered by scholars such as Paul Ramsey and Leon Kass, raise the primary moral question regarding organ donation, which is largely semantic in nature. They debated the definitions of life, death, the human person, and the body.
The Roma, a religious group, oppose organ donation on religious grounds; however, this position is not representative of most of the world's religions, which support organ donation as a form of charity that greatly benefits the community. Many issues also concern patient autonomy, living wills, and guardianship. These issues make involuntary organ donation nearly impossible, but where matters of public health are at stake, the interest of the state could potentially override a patient's right to autonomy.
Cloning has also been a particular concern within deontological debates and remains highly controversial, especially when a clone is created with the express purpose of being destroyed for organ harvesting. Despite this controversy, such technology would theoretically eliminate the risk of transplant rejection entirely. Another emerging area of debate is xenotransplantation — the transplanting of animal organs into humans — which has raised concerns among animal rights groups opposed to the sacrifice of animals for this purpose.
"Illegal organ markets and wealth inequality concerns"
"Physical and financial risks faced by donors"
"Bioethical standards for ethical organ donation"
It seems simple enough: donate organs and save lives. Yet many people remain hesitant, blinded by myths surrounding transplantation. More than 95,000 people were on the U.S. organ transplant waiting list at the time of this writing. Nearly 6,000 people died waiting for a transplant in 2006 — approximately 16 people per day.4
You’re 46% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.