This paper examines experiential family counseling, tracing its origins through the work of leading figures Carl Whitaker and Walter Kempler. It outlines the theory's core assumptions — that the family is the fundamental unit of society and the primary site for resolving individual problems — and explores why Whitaker deliberately avoided formal theory in favor of intuition, authenticity, and strategic provocation. The paper discusses key concepts such as therapist self-mastery and the role of intuition, reviews techniques including Whitaker's "psychotherapy of absurdity," and draws comparisons between experiential family therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy. The discussion concludes with reflections on what makes this approach distinctive and why it may not suit every counselor.
Experiential family counseling focuses on role-playing and other multisensory techniques, allowing family members to step into one another's shoes through role-play exercises in order to better understand each other, develop empathy, and work through issues together (Tuttle, 1998). This paper identifies the leading figures in experiential family counseling, along with the historical and current context, core assumptions, development of the theory, key concepts, and techniques as they relate to a personal approach to counseling. Similarities and differences between experiential family counseling and other leading theories will also be explored.
Carl Whitaker helped found experiential family therapy in the 20th century. Whitaker emphasized the role of the family in the therapeutic process and demonstrated that the humanistic approach could be used to involve all family members, allowing them to come together to understand the issues affecting them all (Neil & Kniskern, 1982). The Family Crucible, a major work co-authored with Augustus Napier, focused on the emotional lives of families and argued that the family dynamic often needed to be shocked out of its complacency in order to address its inner dysfunction (Napier & Whitaker, 2011). Whitaker was sometimes accused of being rude, abrupt, and inappropriate with clients — all of it was deliberate. His aim was to prompt family members to think about what they were glossing over and to voice those thoughts and feelings that so often went unspoken in their interactions.
Walter Kempler was another leading figure in experiential family therapy. He emphasized the need to discern the emotions that often go unexpressed but that exist behind the words and expressions family members use in their interactions. He argued that so long as these feelings remain uncommunicated, they will fester and create tensions within the family that can spill over into other areas of life (Kempler, 1965). Kempler founded the Kempler Institute in 1979 with Morgens Lund, Lis Keisler, and Jesper Juul, with the intention of training professionals in experiential psychotherapy for families in need of counseling (About Kempler Institute, 2019).
With the death of Carl Whitaker in 1995, experiential family therapy lost one of its most prominent figures (Smith, 1998). However, as Smith (1998) points out, the field was already poised to move in new directions, as it was expanding to address gender issues and stereotypes — areas in which Whitaker had often been criticized. A generational gap had developed within the field, and Whitaker represented an older generation's outlook. His passing in the 1990s opened the field to younger researchers and practitioners willing to take experiential family therapy in new directions.
The fundamental aim of experiential family counseling has always been to promote creativity within the family and to use the character of the counselor to facilitate that process. Avoiding an exclusive emphasis on the rational and the objective is central to the approach (Carson, 1999). This is one reason Whitaker promoted a post-modern orientation, and why that orientation continues to be appreciated by counselors who adopt this method (Cag & Voltan Acar, 2015).
"Family as social unit; Whitaker's anti-theory stance"
"Self-mastery, intuition, and provocative technique"
"Contrasts experiential therapy with CBT"
Neil, J., & Kniskern, D. (1982). From psyche to system: The evolving therapy of Carl Whitaker. Guilford Press.
Smith, G. L. (1998). The present state and future of symbolic-experiential family therapy: A post-modern analysis. Contemporary Family Therapy, 20(2), 147–161.
Thompson, S. J., Bender, K., Cardoso, J. B., & Flynn, P. M. (2011). Experiential activities in family therapy: Perceptions of caregivers and youth. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(5), 560–568. doi:10.1007/s10826-010-9428-x
Tuttle, L. C. (1998). Experiential family therapy: An innovative approach to the resolution of family conflict in genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 7(2), 167–186. doi:10.1023/A:1022802006630
Watson, J. C. (2011). Treatment failure in humanistic and experiential psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(11), 1117–1128. doi:10.1002/jclp.20849
Whitaker, C. A., & Bumberry, W. A. (1988). Dancing with the family: A symbolic-experiential approach. Brunner/Mazel.
You’re 35% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.