This reflection paper reviews key learning outcomes from a business course, focusing on how journaling and online discussions surfaced personal biases and differing stakeholder perspectives. The paper explores how conservative and liberal viewpoints shape media consumption habits and public opinion, how internal business values determine stakeholder definitions, and how bias affects decision-making. It also examines the tension between government regulation and free enterprise, and the dual nature of globalization as both an opportunity and an ethical challenge for modern businesses.
The journaling process provided direct examples of individual bias and of the degree to which pre-existing beliefs and perceptions color how individuals interpret the world around them. For example, journaling revealed that people with predominantly conservative political views maintain fundamental beliefs that differ substantially from those held by people with fundamentally liberal points of view. One important aspect of modern media consumption that emerged from this process is that people tend to seek out editorial opinions consistent with the ones they already hold, reinforcing rather than challenging their existing views.
Rather than seeking objective analysis and critical review of the information they consume, many individuals allow a narrow range of opinion to shape their understanding of facts and circumstances that are highly susceptible to media bias. This pattern — commonly described as an echo chamber effect — limits exposure to alternative perspectives and entrenches existing beliefs. Journaling exercises involving internal and external stakeholder identification further revealed that within business organizations, the very definition of stakeholders, especially external ones, depends substantially on the internal policies and values of those organizations and their leaders.
Participating in online course discussions significantly increased awareness of both personal views and those of others. Through these exchanges, it became clear that many individuals who accept the conservative political position regarding fault for the current economic environment tend to believe that placing greater power in the hands of the wealthiest industries and organizations is the most effective path to job creation. These individuals often do not appear open to objective scrutiny of the fundamental assumptions underlying those beliefs.
Conversely, individuals with liberal beliefs sometimes oppose policies that support commerce and large organizations without fully considering the potential benefits to all stakeholders. Recognizing these tendencies on both sides prompted a personal effort to expand the range of media sources consulted, moving beyond those previously relied upon most heavily. As media bias research consistently shows, diversifying one's information sources is an important step toward more balanced and informed decision-making.
The most significant learning from this course was the extent to which different initial perspectives and biases shape the views of individuals. In the context of internal business decision-making, this concept substantially dictates how organizations define external stakeholders and what duties and obligations they believe they owe to various stakeholder groups. Understanding stakeholder theory in this light makes it clear that no organization's approach to stakeholder management is entirely neutral — it is always filtered through the values and assumptions of its leadership.
"Balancing necessary regulation with free-market principles"
"Globalization offers opportunity but raises ethical labor concerns"
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.