This paper examines the boundary between legitimate criminal profiling and bias-based policing, arguing that every citizen is entitled to equal treatment under the law. It defines bias-based policing as action driven by personal, societal, or institutional prejudices rather than observed behavior or factual evidence. The paper distinguishes lawful criminal profiling — which draws on expertise, activity patterns, and documented motives — from prohibited bias-based profiling, which relies solely on characteristics such as race, religion, or gender. It also clarifies that race and related factors may legitimately appear in a criminal profile when grounded in case facts, not investigator bias.
Every citizen deserves the highest standard of service and equal treatment under the law, regardless of color, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion, economic status, background, age, or culture. This principle forms the cornerstone of legitimate law enforcement practice. When an officer makes decisions or implements police action based on personal, societal, or institutional biases or stereotypes — rather than on evidence and observed behaviors that would give rise to reasonable suspicion that a person has engaged in, is engaged in, or is about to engage in criminal activity — this is known as bias-based policing.
Many people believe a police officer cannot use profiling because it is against the law. In fact, criminal profiling is acceptable and regularly employed by law enforcement. Bias-based profiling, by contrast, is prohibited and serves no purpose in reducing or preventing crime. Understanding the difference between these two practices is essential to evaluating whether a given police action reflects sound professional judgment or unlawful discrimination.
Criminal profiling limits the pool of potential suspects in a criminal investigation using legitimate law enforcement expertise, education, and experience. Factors including factual information, activity patterns, and motives are considered when developing a suspect profile. On the other hand, using race, gender, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, background, economic status, culture, or age as the only justification for police action constitutes bias-based profiling. What distinguishes bias-based profiling from legal criminal profiling, therefore, is the absence of facts, suspicious behavior, or specific criminal information.
"The threshold where policing becomes racial profiling"
"When race and demographics may lawfully factor in"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.