This essay argues against the use of government-mandated curfews for teenagers, contending that such policies create more problems than they solve. The paper examines how curfews effectively criminalize otherwise law-abiding young people, place unnecessary burdens on police resources, and strip parents of their authority to govern their own children according to their own cultural, religious, or personal standards. The essay also addresses the counterargument that curfews promote public safety and reduce delinquency, ultimately dismissing it in favor of the position that curfews infringe on the rights of both teenagers and their parents.
Curfews for teenagers have long been a tradition in communities as a way to keep young people off the streets and out of harm's way. A curfew is a specific time set by city officials that determines when a certain age group must be home. This becomes a law of the community, meaning violations are punishable. While curfews may seem to be in children's best interest, they create more problems than they solve.
One problem that stems from curfews is that they make criminals of otherwise law-abiding teenagers. If a teenager is on public streets five minutes, ten minutes, or an hour past curfew, they are subject to arrest. This makes them a criminal for something that, for the rest of the population, is not a crime. Moreover, it categorizes and stereotypes all teenagers as delinquents — as if to say that any teenager on the streets after curfew must be up to no good, that they could not possibly have a legitimate excuse for being out past a certain time.
Another problem with curfews is that they create a needless burden on the police force. While law officers should be addressing more important matters — such as real crime — they are forced to spend time rounding up teenagers who are out past curfew. This takes time away from officers who may be needed for other situations and may also allow genuine crimes to go undetected or unprevented.
If a teenager is committing a real crime, that is one thing — police should address it. However, arresting a teenager simply for being on the street after curfew creates hostility among young people toward law officials. As researchers and criminal justice policy analysts have noted, curfew enforcement can strain the relationship between youth and law enforcement without producing meaningful reductions in crime. Curfews create victims and criminals out of otherwise innocent people.
"Government curfews override family rules and values"
"Addresses safety claims made by curfew supporters"
Curfews do little more than create hardships for teenagers and their parents. There are countless reasons why a teenager may be out past 11 p.m. or midnight — work, dances, movies, parties, or simply socializing — none of which are crimes. A teenager may have simply lost track of time, which is a matter for his or her parents to address, not the police department. Curfews take rights away from both teenagers and parents, and communities would be better served by policies that address the root causes of youth delinquency rather than restricting the freedom of all young people.
You’re 66% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.