This paper examines the growing population of non-traditional students (NTS) — adults over 25 balancing college with work, family, and other responsibilities — and the challenges they face in higher education. Drawing on national statistics, the campus climate framework proposed by Hurtado, and diversity research, the paper analyzes how institutions have adapted to serve this demographic. It discusses discriminatory barriers, the role of affirmative action, online learning platforms, and campus support programs, concluding with recommendations for administrators to improve accountability, structural diversity, and inclusive environments for non-traditional and underrepresented students.
Non-traditional students (NTS) are students over the age of 25 enrolled in college. These students differ from traditional young students who enter college straight from high school with relatively few responsibilities. The NTS population has grown rapidly from the late 1990s to the present, with more and more students taking evening classes, part-time classes, and short courses while juggling unemployment or full-time employment to get by (Adebayour, 2014). In the early 2000s, American colleges reported that approximately 73% of their student population was non-traditional — students who were either employed or veterans returning from military service. A 2009 U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics (USDE-NCES) report indicated that 40% of the student population were NTS, though this figure varies depending on the methodology used. This is a worldwide trend, with increasing numbers of people enrolling in online classes and shorter courses because of competing commitments.
Many adult students identify as non-traditional because they are over 25 and employed but still working toward completing a degree. This reflects the realities of modern adult life as the world shifts away from traditional approaches to education. The primary driver for choosing NTS status is time. In today's fast-moving world, there is barely time to fulfill all obligations. With many courses now offered online, it has become easier to pursue a degree without attending a physical campus, allowing students to balance school and work more effectively. According to Broeckelman-Post and MacArthur, higher education expansion in the United States accelerated after the G.I. Bill was passed in 1944. Traditional students — those who enrolled in college immediately after high school at age eighteen, worked part-time or not at all, and graduated in exactly four years — were once the norm.
A student over the age of 25 can benefit from programs designed with age-based needs in mind. Moreover, such students may also benefit from support programs that account for the need to balance parenting, caregiving, and employment. It is clearly less challenging to create a program for a student with only one non-traditional characteristic. Creating programs for students with multiple non-traditional characteristics — which is the case for many NTS — is considerably more difficult (Diaz-Chaviano, 2011). All of these factors create a multilevel challenge for institutions that wish to carefully develop programs facilitating successful transitions to college and degree completion.
By 2014, approximately 70% of students in colleges were non-traditional. According to research by the National Center for Education Statistics, 35% of that population enrolled in two-year courses, while the remaining 65% enrolled in four-year courses on a part-time basis due to employment or other activities such as sports or civic engagement. Institutions of higher learning play an important role in bringing together diverse groups of people from around the world, and governments have taken initiative to ensure that student needs are addressed through institutional programs. It has taken most institutions some time to adapt to this new phenomenon, but progress is being made. Universities have introduced online courses for non-traditional students and adjusted course schedules to accommodate their availability.
Lecturers have also been assigned to assist NTS across various programs. Teaching a diverse group of employed adults presents communication challenges, which has contributed to the expansion of language courses offered as electives. Technology has played an important role in helping institutions accommodate this growing population. Most universities now maintain websites where course materials, instructor information, and available classes are clearly listed, making the process of inquiry more manageable. Additionally, government programs such as student loans and scholarships have enabled non-traditional students to persist in their studies. Balancing school and work is no easy feat, but institutional and government support can make it achievable. International students remain particularly affected — learning a new language while simultaneously attending school and seeking employment (often complicated by work permit restrictions) highlights the range of issues that institutions and governments must address when serving today's typical college student.
The campus climate framework, as articulated by Hurtado, measures the real or perceived quality of interpersonal, professional, and academic interactions on campus in relation to current issues, demographics, and the attitudes of both students and staff. It examines the conditions necessary for every participant in the university environment to thrive and fulfill their needs. This framework explores what students experience in terms of discrimination or mistreatment, what staff encounter, and the overall environment that shapes individuals who pass through these institutions.
University is a place intended to shape minds in preparation for the wider world. For non-traditional students, understanding their campus experiences is essential for developing effective research and support. Various surveys assess how students interact on campus — whether they use formal or informal language depending on context, whether they enjoy their time at the institution, and whether they build meaningful connections or feel excluded. These are particularly relevant questions for non-traditional students navigating campus life alongside demanding schedules.
Institutions of higher learning are expected to equip students with the knowledge and skills needed to succeed. Perceptions matter greatly: when choosing a college, students research institutions to determine whether they will meet their needs. Institutions have an obligation to protect students from harm, and Hurtado's model provides guidelines for fulfilling that obligation. Non-traditional students have campus experiences that differ markedly from those of traditional students. Because they are working adults attending classes, they may be perceived — and treated — differently. Lecturers sometimes treat them as if they already possess knowledge of certain subject matter, which is a form of discrimination rooted in assumption rather than assessment.
Institutional policies also affect students directly. For example, students may wish to work part-time on campus while studying, but university employment policies may exclude unqualified staff. This can demotivate students without giving them cause to leave. Universities should consider creating temporary employment opportunities for NTS as a form of support. Demographics illustrate campus diversity through numerical representation of different races and genders, and institutional leaders must prioritize equitable treatment that respects students' beliefs, cultures, religions, and backgrounds. Students, in turn, bear responsibility for reciprocating by following institutional rules and contributing to a mutually conducive environment.
Research shows that many campus administrators prioritize institutional interests over student needs, leaving students with unmet expectations. Discrimination, though prohibited, occurs frequently in practice. Proving that one was discriminated against is especially difficult when the affected party is undocumented, was in an ambiguous situation, or faces a language barrier that complicates their ability to report or substantiate a complaint.
Demographics reveal the diversity of campus populations, and institutional leaders must treat all individuals according to their beliefs, cultures, religions, and identities without discrimination. Students also need to reciprocate by adhering to community standards so that the shared environment remains conducive to learning for everyone. The proportion of students seeking knowledge grows daily, but in diverse environments, conflicts inevitably arise and must be addressed promptly.
Language carries significant power in diverse communities and must be monitored accordingly. To protect all students, institutions should assess compositional diversity to determine what proportion of the population belongs to underrepresented groups, enabling the administration to develop appropriate policies. A psychological dimension of assessment helps identify the range of perspectives present and informs approaches to supporting student development. Organizational and structural dimensions address the roles of staff, support personnel, students, and the broader public. Recognizing and respecting authority within institutions must be cultivated among both students and staff to ensure effective institutional governance. The behavioral dimension focuses on analyzing behaviors across cultural backgrounds and developing strategies for mutual tolerance. Finally, the historical legacy of inclusion is a critical component of the framework — ensuring that decision-making processes in the university environment are representative of all ethnicities so that every member of the community feels genuinely included.
Non-traditional students represent a significant and growing segment of the academic world, and there is an urgent need to adjust institutional environments to accommodate them effectively. The campus climate framework has provided a foundation for addressing the basic needs of new and part-time students, facilitating learning and campus life. The framework has promoted shared diversity values, enabling students and campus leaders to learn from one another, understand different cultures and beliefs, and engage freely without fear of discrimination. History courses on various cultures and regions of the world contribute to this educational goal.
"Discrimination, policy gaps, and unmet student needs"
"Diversity initiatives, online learning, and campus reforms"
Panacci, A. G. (2015). Adult students in higher education: Classroom experiences and needs. College Quarterly, 1–3.
Turnbull, D. (2014). Who are non-traditional students? A systematic review of published definitions. Educational Research and Reviews, 1–3.
You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.