This paper examines Jim Collins' concept of Level Five Leadership, as developed in his book Good to Great. It surveys all five levels of leadership — from the Highly Capable Individual at Level One through the Effective Leader at Level Four — before defining what distinguishes a truly great, Level Five Leader. The paper argues that while the first four levels represent competent and effective leadership, only Level Five leaders combine all prior capabilities with genuine humility and indomitable will. Drawing on Maslow's hierarchy of needs, various definitions of leadership, and real-world examples, the paper illustrates why selfless devotion to mission and stakeholders — rather than personal glory — is the hallmark of greatness in leadership.
Level Five Leadership is a concept developed by Jim Collins in his book Good to Great. Level Five Leaders are top-notch leaders — they are the greats who make big things happen, the ones about whom books are written, and the ones who leave the biggest shoes to fill when they are gone.
Collins describes five levels of leadership. This paper briefly discusses the four levels that precede the top level, then defines what it means to be a Level Five Leader, and provides some examples of Level Five Leadership that can be found in the world today.
The first four levels of leadership range from capable to effective leaders. These are not bad levels of leadership by any means, but they cannot be called great. While "great" may be considered a subjective term, Collins defines it simply: a great leader possesses the abilities required at each of the first four levels and also possesses the humility and will to go above and beyond. To understand what that means, however, one must first understand each level.
The Level One leader is not a bad leader. As Collins says, "At this level, you make high-quality contributions with your work. You possess useful levels of knowledge, and you have the talent and skills needed to do a good job." This kind of leader meets expectations but never rises above them and never does anything to truly transform an organization into something better than anyone imagined. Level One leaders can fill the role, but they are not out there inspiring others to excel or to exceed their potential. They are not creating a new culture through an authentic, charismatic, or transformational leadership style, nor are they likely to be the kind of servant leaders who change the course of history. They are simply individuals who possess the skills and knowledge needed to fill the role assigned to them. They show up, do what is expected, and move on. They do not underperform, but if they left tomorrow they could be replaced by the next in line, assuming that person possesses the same skills and knowledge. In short, they demonstrate the bare foundation of leadership: know-how, talent, and the skills to do a good job.
The Level Two leader is a team player who moves beyond merely his own need to perform by considering the roles of others and how he can support them. Collins states that "at Level 2, you use your knowledge and skills to help your team succeed. You work effectively, productively, and successfully with other people in your group." Communication is one of the most important tools of a Level Two leader, and that involves both being a good listener and being able to use social and emotional intelligence to deliver important information and support to others.
Self-concept is the other important factor at this level. Self-concept refers simply to who a person thinks he is. It shapes one's communication style and impacts how one forms relationships, and it also affects how other people relate to you. Self-concept is important in the group dynamic because so much of that dynamic is shaped by how individuals see themselves, communicate, and form relationships. If some members are communicating — both verbally and non-verbally — in ways that negatively affect others, it can create tension and additional challenges for the group to overcome. A healthy self-concept facilitates discussion and communication, whereas a poor self-concept can prevent communication from happening and relationships from forming.
The Level Three manager takes his communication skills and combines them with the ability to manage others in meaningful ways. Collins notes that "here, you're able to organize a group effectively to achieve specific goals and objectives." This is where the managing principle of leadership comes into play. The leader must be able to make decisions about what direction the group, team, department, or organization should take, and must manage resources effectively — otherwise, the team will never reach the destination the leader has envisioned. Level Three leadership is about understanding the alignment between resources, mission, and vision.
Morale and motivation are often directly impacted by the behaviors of managers. If managers are not leading in a positive and effective manner, employee performance can suffer: workers may feel micromanaged and distrusted, or they may feel overworked in a high-pressure culture that leads to burnout and increased turnover, harming overall productivity. Employees need supportive leaders who manage well so that their own performance is not adversely affected. Management, at its best, is about developing workers and helping them grow and reach their potential — not about moving workers around like chess pieces while neglecting their humanity and innate need to self-actualize. Managers must be mindful of employee needs, because workers must think critically to do their jobs well, and the manager must be able and willing to help them develop that skill. This requires supportiveness, insight, mindfulness, time, and open communication so that employees can both give and receive input.
Common failures of management include: (1) being inconsistent and volatile, (2) micromanaging, (3) failing to be adaptive or flexible toward the needs of others, (4) trying to have all the answers instead of admitting uncertainty, (5) failing to prioritize and promote learning, (6) being perpetually too busy, (7) confusing transparency with a breach of confidentiality, (8) promoting an unsustainable 24/7 work culture, (9) being too focused on results alone, (10) telling instead of coaching, (11) neglecting inclusivity, (12) neglecting to obtain input from employees, (13) giving excessive unsolicited advice, (14) failing to lead mindfully, and (15) not managing expectations. To be an effective Level Three leader, one must avoid these management pitfalls.
According to Collins, "Level 4 is the category that most top leaders fall into. Here, you're able to galvanize a department or organization to meet performance objectives and achieve a vision." This level is often mistaken for the top tier simply because the leader is achieving a vision and reaching the goals the organization set for itself. However, the difference between a Level Four and a Level Five leader is that the Level Four leader is still doing the work because he wants it to reflect well on himself. He wants the praise, the recognition, and the satisfaction — he is driven to achieve because he wants the glory. He is not leading entirely for the sake of something external to himself; rather, he is leading because he ultimately wants to be admired. As a result, something is missing in his leadership — a character trait, a spark, a true passion for the mission itself. He leads effectively, but he does not necessarily inspire leadership in others or enable others to become self-actualizing.
As Maslow (1943) points out in his hierarchy of needs and theory of human motivation, the pinnacle of the needs hierarchy is self-actualization, but to get there people must have their lower-level needs satisfied first — shelter, food, a sense of belonging, love, esteem, and self-respect. Once those needs have been met, the individual will become self-motivated. Most leaders want to be surrounded by self-motivated workers, but this is not always possible, so a great leader is able to identify what each worker needs and support them in reaching their full potential.
There is no single, one-size-fits-all definition of leadership. According to Chamers (2014), leadership is "a process by which a person directs, guides and influences the behavior and work of others towards accomplishment of specific goals in a given situation" (69). One can do this by being a servant leader, a transformational leader, a charismatic leader, an authoritarian leader, a democratic leader, or any other type that works for the people involved in their particular environment. But to be a great leader, one must lead for the sake of others — not for one's own sake. It is only when people recognize that one is leading for the sake of the mission, the vision, the organization, and its stakeholders that they are truly inspired to be all they can be, and that the organization becomes truly capable of reaching heights previously unimagined.
What separates the great leader from the effective leader is that the great leader gives everything to the mission itself — to others. The self does not enter his vocabulary or his thoughts. He is selfless in his devotion to the objective, to the mission, to the vision, to the stakeholders involved, and to the workers following him. As Collins states, "At Level 5, you have all of the abilities needed for the other four levels, plus you have the unique blend of humility and will that's required for true greatness."
The key traits of a Level Five Leader are (1) humility and (2) fierce resolve — that is, a strong, indomitable will (Collins). They are ambitious, but not blindly so. Their ambition is tempered by the awareness that they are working for a higher cause than themselves. They are conscious of serving an organizational goal — a mission they seek to accomplish. Their humility allows them to subordinate themselves to the organization, while their ambition and drive enable them to push through obstacles and achieve success.
"Explores empathy, vision, and indomitable will"
"Applies the framework to real-world leaders"
Level Five Leadership combines the characteristics and capabilities of the other four levels of leadership and adds to them selfless humility and fierce resolve. The Level Five Leader resembles the Level Four leader in effectiveness, but the critical difference is that the Level Five Leader does it all for others — for the good of the organization and for the good of its stakeholders — whereas the Level Four leader does it primarily for himself, imagining the glory that will be his for leading well. The Level Five Leader does not think about himself; instead, he thinks about others and motivates them to become self-actualizing and selfless in turn.
You’re 72% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.