This paper examines the tension between global and traditional economies in the modern marketplace. It analyzes how multinational corporations dominate local markets, assesses the economic impact of a thriving global economy on both individual countries and the world system, and evaluates protectionist policies designed to safeguard traditional industries. Through case examples including McDonald's, Coca-Cola, and Japan's automotive sector, the paper argues that while global economies provide stability and currency strength, traditional industries require protection through taxation, licensing fees, and government incentives to survive and benefit local populations.
An economy can be described as closed or open. A closed economy is one where all earnings and income flows are locally generated, involving no importation or exportation. In contrast, an open economy encompasses trade with other countries and local traders. In recent years, international companies have entered local markets, raising serious economic concerns for many nations. States are interested in stabilizing their economies and protecting them from multinational invasion. This issue has become central to discussions among government leaders and has influenced the political processes of nations worldwide.
Multinational corporations have proven to be more effective and efficient than most local companies, often providing higher-quality products. For instance, McDonald's is currently one of the most sought-after companies by consumers worldwide, regardless of country. This American-based multinational hamburger producer convinces consumers to purchase its products through effective marketing and maintaining high-quality standards. Similarly, Coca-Cola has invaded virtually every country in the world today.
Multinationals thrive because they possess greater financial resources than local companies, allowing them to marshal superior marketing strength and achieve competitive advantages. Additional factors contributing to multinational success include the consumer enthusiasm for products originating from international markets. This global appeal makes their offerings more attractive to local populations.
An individual country can be negatively affected by a thriving international economy that supersedes the local market. When international markets flourish, they attract clients away from local businesses. Local companies typically have a more positive impact on the economy than foreign companies do. They promote the welfare of people and contribute to national wealth through tax remittance to the state. International companies, conversely, fail to provide these fundamental services to the local economy. Although they may generate revenue through taxation, they cannot maintain steady income flows since they are not permanent residents of the market. They can depart at any time.
A second major challenge is that international companies frequently recruit employees from outside the country. This compounds economic damage. These businesses undermine local ones by failing to compensate for job losses among unemployed locals. Their presence, therefore, is not beneficial and is highly costly to the economy.
The world economy benefits significantly from a thriving international economy. One major advantage is the stability of frequently used currencies, such as the dollar. A stable dollar ensures that countries maintain stable economies as well. The importance of a thriving global economy is demonstrated by the 2008 financial crisis. During this crisis, a general economic meltdown occurred globally. The instability destabilized the dollar, the world's primary currency, which caused inflation rates to rise above officially recommended levels. Massive unemployment and increased cost of living affected countries worldwide. A stable and thriving international economy is required to protect local economies. The 2008 crisis occurred partly because virtually all countries pursue open economies, demonstrating the interconnection among global economies.
Although international markets are important, their influence on traditional economies must be controlled. This is achieved through protectionist policy, where governments adopt measures promoting local industries against adverse effects of excessive international competition. Several mechanisms accomplish this objective.
Taxation is one avenue through which local industry is protected. Excessive tariffs on imports can reduce importation and prevent the collapse of local industries. Additionally, governments can protect local industries by charging higher registration and business licensing fees to external companies than to local ones. This makes markets more favorable to local enterprises.
These protectionist measures are reactive. Other approaches involve promoting local industries to counter multinational expansion. One method is providing government incentives to encourage local development. Incentives include charging low registration fees, offering partial or full funding for local industry growth, and creating an enabling environment for business operation. Governments can also establish business interaction programs where small local businesses access information about local investments, receive advice on best practices to boost earnings, and ask questions about their ventures. These interactions give local businesses an advantage in exploiting their home market more effectively than international companies, since they operate in a market they understand. Foreign firms must first learn the market before attempting to exploit it.
Japan exemplifies countries that have protected their traditional markets. Japan has shifted toward safeguarding its automotive assembly tradition by establishing several assembling plants in the United States. Toyota, a Japanese company operating in the U.S., sells more vehicles in America than all other local assembling companies combined. This demonstrates how internationally based companies have contributed to the decline of local industries.
Both traditional and global economies play significant roles in overall human welfare. However, excessive dominance of global economies can destroy traditional industries. Traditional industries are closest to local populations and have the best chance to improve people's welfare compared to the global economy. For this reason, they require protection. Global economies, however, also play an important role in achieving stable local economies. Therefore, a balance must be struck to ensure that both traditional and global economies interact optimally.
You’re 96% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.