This paper examines The Coca-Cola Company's mission, vision, and values statements to determine how well they reflect the company's actual business strategy. While each statement taken individually has limitations — particularly the vague mission statement — together they form a coherent picture of Coca-Cola's commitment to sustainable, long-term growth. Drawing on strategic planning frameworks, including Michael Porter's thinking on competitive strategy, the paper analyzes how Coca-Cola's six-part vision addresses diverse stakeholder needs, how its values balance individual accountability with collective purpose, and how the overall triad supports a company that has built its brand on more than a product.
Coca-Cola is a massive international business that sells soft drinks and other products in countries around the world. As large as Coca-Cola is, it has built its reputation not simply because of its namesake beverage, but because the company has managed to capture a feeling. Drinking a Coke is not simply an act of hydration — it goes beyond that. It is because Coca-Cola has managed to transcend being a mere soft drink company that it has attained such a high market share in the United States and in many other countries as well. As the world continues to change, Coca-Cola must change with it in order to continue to thrive.
The company's current mission, vision, and values statements not only reflect its current concerns, but also demonstrate how the company plans to advance its growth over the next decade. Coca-Cola's mission, values, and vision statements make it clear that the company has one overarching goal: sustainable, quality growth. As Michael Porter would suggest, Coca-Cola is not concerned with fostering explosive, unsustainable growth. Instead, Coca-Cola recognizes that dismissing strategy as incompatible with a quickly changing marketplace "reflects a deeply flawed view of competition," and chooses deliberate strategy over the limitless flexibility of a company with no strategy at all (Hammonds, 2001). In fact, strategy can help a company respond to change. As one framework puts it, strategic planning identifies where the organization wants to be at some point in the future and how it is going to get there; the "strategic" part of this process involves continual attention to current changes in the organization and its external environment, and how those changes affect the organization's future (McNamara, 2009, Developing).
This paper examines whether Coca-Cola's mission, vision, and values statements reflect the company's actual approach to business. While each statement taken individually is insufficient to fully apprise stakeholders of Coca-Cola's future goals, taken together they form a strong picture of where Coca-Cola is and where it wants to be.
A company's mission statement is critical because it conveys to all stakeholders — both internal and external — where the company stands and where it wants to go. The mission statement is generally concise: "The mission statement communicates the firm's core ideology and visionary goals, generally consisting of the following three components: 1. Core values to which the firm is committed; 2. Core purpose of the firm; [and] 3. Visionary goals the firm will pursue to fulfill its mission" (Internet Center for Management and Business Administration, 2010, Business Vision).
By that definition, Coca-Cola's mission statement falls short. According to Coca-Cola, its mission "declares our purpose as a company and serves as a standard against which we weigh our actions and decisions. To refresh the world… To inspire moments of optimism and happiness… To create value and make a difference" (Coca-Cola, 2011). That statement gives very little insight into where the company hopes to be in the future — it is simply too vague. It does not really explain how Coca-Cola will accomplish the goal of refreshing the world, nor does it speak directly to the concerns of consumers, employees, stockholders, or community members.
However, it is clear that Coca-Cola intends for its mission statement to be read in conjunction with its values and vision statements. Coca-Cola explicitly refers to its mission as the start of the roadmap for the business (Coca-Cola, 2011). A mission statement also needs to be short enough to be memorable, and that constraint inevitably limits its specificity. Therefore, while the mission statement leaves stakeholders wondering how Coca-Cola will accomplish its lofty goals, it is adequate as long as the rest of the company's strategic framework provides the necessary foundations — which, as the vision and values statements demonstrate, it does.
"A vision is a statement about what your organization wants to become. It should resonate with all members of the organization and help them feel proud, excited, motivated, and part of something much bigger than themselves. A vision should stretch the organization's capabilities and image of itself. The vision gives shape and direction to the organization's future" (Heathfield, 2009). Coca-Cola says that its vision serves as the framework for the roadmap and describes what the company needs to accomplish in order to achieve sustainable, quality growth (Coca-Cola, 2011).
Unlike the mission statement, Coca-Cola's vision statement becomes specific and addresses the needs of individual stakeholders. Coca-Cola meets the challenge of resonating across its stakeholder base by breaking its vision into six components: people, portfolio, partners, planet, profit, and productivity.
It is important to recognize that even the order of these components is part of strategy. Coca-Cola did not arrange them randomly; placing "people" first conveys the message that people are the company's top priority. Another notable feature is that the vision discusses customers in terms of partnership, granting greater ownership of the relationship to customers and consumers. This framing constantly reaffirms the idea that people come first.
There are broad implications embedded in these statements. A company that places people first is expected not to make hiring and firing decisions based solely on economic factors, not to subject employees to dangerous working conditions, and not to engage in the kind of deliberate misrepresentation that the tobacco industry employed when discussing the health consequences of its products. This allows all stakeholders — whether they are taking a sip of a Coke or purchasing a large block of Coca-Cola stock — to understand the intended impact of their relationship with the company. This approach aligns with widely recognized principles of stakeholder theory, which holds that firms create more durable value by considering the interests of all parties affected by their operations.
"Values represent the core priorities in the organization's culture, including what drives members' priorities and how they truly act in the organization. Values are increasingly important in strategic planning. They often drive the intent and direction for 'organic' planners" (McNamara, 2009, Basics). Coca-Cola frames its values as the compass for its actions — a critical metaphor, because a stakeholder should be able to look at any proposed action and at the values statement and determine whether the action aligns with the company's stated commitments.
"Individual accountability balanced with collective purpose"
Although, taken individually, Coca-Cola's mission, values, and vision statements may be lacking, taken as a whole they work together to give various stakeholders a coherent understanding of where the company is and where it wants to be. The mission statement is intentionally broad and serves as an aspirational anchor; the vision statement provides the operational specificity the mission lacks, addressing six distinct dimensions of stakeholder concern; and the values statement supplies the behavioral compass that guides day-to-day decisions.
You’re 65% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.