This paper examines key methodological concepts in research design through the lens of a 10-nation entrepreneurship study. It identifies independent and dependent variables, discusses intervening, extraneous, and moderating variables, and evaluates whether causal studies can be conducted without fully controlling all variable types. The paper also explores the impact of using national experts as key informants, noting how this practice introduces selection and perception bias into findings. Additionally, it addresses whether causal conclusions can be drawn from descriptive, ordinal, or interval data, weighing the roles of qualitative and quantitative methods in establishing causation versus correlation.
In this study, the dependent variable is entrepreneurship activity. The independent variables are the activities designed to stimulate entrepreneurship: promotion, facilitation, long-term commitment to secondary education, developing a society's capacity to accommodate higher levels of income disparity, and creating a culture that validates and promotes entrepreneurship throughout society.
The 10-nation study design attempted to account for several intervening, extraneous, and moderating variables. These included innovation, culture, the economy (GDP), geography and politics (geopolitics), proximity to needed supply chains, available resources, and government subsidies. By spanning multiple nations, the study sought to minimize the influence of any single country's unique circumstances on the overall findings.
Extraneous variables should be controlled when possible, but it is not always feasible to control for all of them, given their very nature as extraneous factors. Intervening variables are hypothetical by definition and cannot be directly observed in a study, which is why their influence cannot be precisely determined or controlled. Moderating variables can be controlled to some extent, as they are identifiable and may affect the relationship between the independent and the dependent variable (Bauman, Sallis, Dzewaltowski & Owen, 2002; MacKinnon, 2011).
"How expert key informants introduce bias into findings"
"Debate over causation when data is descriptive or ordinal"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.