This case study examines Bob McMath's framework for new product development and its alignment with standard product development processes. The paper analyzes five critical questions that determine product success: market positioning, packaging benefits, consumer focus, category creation, and value innovation. Through examples of successful products like Mentadent and cell phones, and failed products such as Dr. Care toothpaste and Gerber's Singles, the paper demonstrates how adherence to McMath's guidelines—prioritizing consumer benefits over features, appropriate packaging, and market positioning—directly impacts product viability and market acceptance.
Bob McMath's "don'ts" and the standard new product development process share fundamental alignment in their approach to bringing products to market. Both strongly recommend that companies develop new products while carefully avoiding common mistakes in naming, packaging, proposed positioning, or labeling. Rather than fixating on product features or technical specifications, both frameworks emphasize that managers, product developers, designers, and creators should highlight the benefits their products offer to consumers.
The critical insight from McMath's approach is that advertising and marketing must play on "clear benefits" to attract the maximum number of consumers. Companies should not assume they know what customers want; instead, they must think in terms of what consumers actually seek in a product and how customers will use it in their daily lives. This consumer-centric perspective, rather than an internally focused feature-driven one, is the foundation of successful new product development.
Bob McMath identifies five essential questions that organizations must ask when marketing a new product. The first question—"Is the new product positioned to create new users or new usage?"—is crucial because product success depends largely on proper market positioning. If a product is not introduced and placed in the right market segment, or if its timing is off (arriving too early or too late), it will fail to generate the desired impact and attract consumers. Poor positioning essentially dooms a product before it reaches the shelf.
The second critical question asks, "Is there new packaging that provides a consumer benefit?" This is significant because most consumers do not have time to read detailed labels and product descriptions; they focus instead on how the product can help them. Many new products fail because they emphasize features rather than tangible consumer benefits. Consumers evaluate products based on the new value they offer; without added value from a new formulation or design, there is no reason for customers to switch from established alternatives.
Technological advancement has heightened consumer expectations for innovation and convenience. Products must be technically sound to compete effectively. The remaining questions address whether the new product creates an entirely new category in the market—compelling consumers to consider it as a distinct option rather than simply comparing it to existing competitors. Without category creation or at minimum clear differentiation, a new product struggles to gain traction. These five questions collectively establish a comprehensive framework for evaluating whether a product has been developed with sufficient attention to consumer needs and market realities.
Several products exemplify McMath's guidelines in action. Mentadent focused on communicating the benefits of its formula rather than overwhelming consumers with technical details, thereby successfully attracting customers. Cell phones created an entirely new category in the communications market, establishing themselves as indispensable tools. Snackwell cookies combined creativity, innovation, and clear consumer benefit—appealing to health-conscious consumers—thereby demonstrating the practical application of McMath's principles for successful product development.
"Why Dr. Care, rabbit jerky, and Gerber's Singles failed in the market"
Bob McMath's guidelines provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating new product success. By emphasizing consumer benefits over features, ensuring appropriate and functional packaging, understanding market positioning, and creating or entering markets strategically, companies significantly improve their chances of product success. The contrast between successful and failed products demonstrates that technical merit alone does not guarantee market acceptance; rather, consumer perception, market timing, and practical usability determine whether a new product thrives or fails.
You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.