This paper examines the Battle of Verdun, one of the longest and costliest engagements of World War I, fought from February to December 1916 in the Meuse Valley of France. Drawing on Roger Chickering's Imperial Germany and the Great War, the paper explains why Germany selected Verdun as a strategic target, traces the major phases of the battle β including the fall and eventual French recapture of Fort Douaumont β and assesses the staggering human cost. The paper concludes by arguing that Verdun exemplified the futility of attritional trench warfare on the Western Front and signaled to German commanders that ultimate victory was no longer achievable.
The Battle of Verdun took place in 1916 at the fortress of Verdun in northeastern France. The engagement stretched over several months across a large area known as the Meuse Valley, beginning in February and lasting into December. It would become one of the defining β and most devastating β confrontations of the First World War.
To the Germans, Verdun was an "ideal place to attack" (Chickering 67) for several reasons. The fortress was militarily vulnerable, it held deep sentimental value for the French people, and the French Army had stripped much of its artillery away to supply troops at other points along the front. These factors together made Verdun appear to German commanders as a target that France would be compelled to defend at any cost β a place where French forces could be bled white.
Although the French were greatly outnumbered at the outset, they moved quickly to shore up their defenses after Fort Douaumont fell to the Germans in February. Despite this early German success, neither side could gain a clear advantage over the months that followed. The stalemate persisted even as Germany redirected many of its troops from Verdun to fight on other fronts. By the end of the year, French forces had recaptured Fort Douaumont, and the campaign "expired in general exhaustion" (Chickering 70). German losses by that point amounted to approximately 750,000 men.
This long-term battle seemed to epitomize the attritional warfare that defined World War I. Neither side could gain a decisive advantage, and both suffered enormous casualties. In total, Germany gained roughly three miles of territory β a result wholly disproportionate to the scale and duration of the effort. The Battle of Verdun consumed months of fighting while accomplishing very little of strategic value.
"Massive casualties and minimal territorial gains"
Chickering, Roger. Imperial Germany and the Great War: 1914β1918. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.