Case Study Undergraduate 1,381 words

Ajax Minerals vs. Perrier: Managing Resistance to Change

~7 min read
Abstract

This paper presents a comparative case study of two companies — Ajax Minerals and Perrier — that each faced significant employee resistance to organizational change. Ajax Minerals confronted competitive pressure from Pacific Rim suppliers, while Perrier suffered a crisis following a benzene contamination scandal and subsequent Nestlé acquisition. The paper contrasts how each organization responded to labor union opposition: Ajax Minerals adopted an open-book management approach and interactive employee sessions, while Perrier largely failed to engage its workforce. The paper also proposes specific strategic adjustments for both companies, including worker education and incentive-based negotiations, to improve the effectiveness of change management initiatives.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper uses a clear parallel structure, analyzing each company individually before drawing direct comparisons, which makes the argument easy to follow.
  • It moves logically from problem identification to comparative analysis to prescriptive recommendations, giving the essay a complete analytical arc.
  • The contrast between Ajax Minerals' proactive employee engagement and Perrier's failure to involve workers is sharply drawn and well-supported by the case details.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates applied comparative case analysis — a core technique in business and management studies. By holding the two cases against each other using a consistent set of criteria (source of resistance, management response, and recommended adjustments), the writer builds a persuasive argument about best practices in change management without needing to rely heavily on abstract theory.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with individual case summaries for Ajax Minerals and Perrier, covering the nature of each company's crisis and the resistance encountered. A dedicated comparison section then evaluates both cases side by side. The paper closes with separate sections proposing targeted strategic adjustments for each company, grounded in the analysis already developed. This six-part structure effectively separates description, analysis, and prescription.

Introduction: Two Companies Facing Resistance to Change

This paper examines two companies — Ajax Minerals and Perrier — that each faced significant resistance to organizational change. Both companies operated in the same broad industry and both encountered opposition from employees and labor unions when attempting to implement new strategies. By comparing how each organization responded to that resistance, and by identifying adjustments that could have improved those responses, it is possible to draw meaningful conclusions about effective change management practice.

Ajax Minerals: Sources of Resistance and Management Response

Since Pacific Rim companies began mining and supplying the same minerals, Ajax Minerals grew increasingly concerned about the company's future. Although the workers did not perceive any emerging issues, management recognized that immediate action was necessary. The first major source of resistance Ajax Minerals encountered was that workers were unwilling to accept any changes. The primary reason for this was that the labor union had long believed management wanted to harm its members. Relations between the union and management were so strained that workers were perpetually suspicious that any change in company policy would result in salary cuts.

The second source of resistance was management's concern that if it drew attention to the problems on the horizon, the labor union would interpret that as a ploy against the workers (Businessweek.com, 2014).

Management responded by ensuring that changes were implemented in a way that brought workers into the process. It called a meeting with employees and committed to seeking solutions only after considering every employee's point of view. To build employee confidence, the company adopted an open-book management approach, giving workers full access to the company's financial data. Over time, this practice became a standard norm at Ajax Minerals, as supervisors, employees, and managers began sharing data with one another in order to develop improved strategies (Blawett, 2011).

Perrier: Crisis, Acquisition, and Labor Conflict

In 1990, traces of benzene were found in one of Perrier's bottles — an event that proved to be a turning point in the company's history. Annual sales declined sharply following the incident and profits fell dramatically. This prompted Nestlé, the world's largest food manufacturing company, to acquire Perrier with the aim of restoring its financial health.

However, Nestlé encountered significant resistance from the workforce. Because Perrier's financial situation was dire and the company had to be taken over by an outside entity, workers were deeply skeptical about their own futures at the company. They feared losing their jobs as a result of the acquisition. A further source of resistance was the poor relationship between management and workers. The labor union, CGT, remained active throughout the transition, working to ensure that workers would not face any injustice under the new management — and Nestlé regarded this union activity as the most significant obstacle it faced.

The situation deteriorated when bottles belonging to a Perrier competitor were discovered in Perrier's cafeteria, an incident that caused management to react aggressively toward workers. Critically, the company did little to resolve its underlying conflicts with employees. Despite the organization's poor performance, management made no serious effort to involve workers in developing strategies for improvement. Instead, a blame game took hold: workers held management responsible for the company's declining performance, while management blamed the labor union for obstructing financial recovery (Barton, 1991). For broader context on how the Perrier brand evolved under Nestlé, the company's history illustrates the long-term consequences of mismanaged labor relations during a crisis.

Both companies can be meaningfully compared because they operated in the same industry and both encountered performance-related challenges that required strategic change. Ajax Minerals faced growing competitive pressure from Pacific Rim suppliers, while Perrier suffered a crisis triggered by the 1990 benzene contamination, after which its sales declined significantly and the company was acquired by Nestlé. In both cases, management recognized the need for strategic change, and in both cases, resistance came from employees and labor unions.

Comparison and Contrast of Change Management Approaches

The nature of that resistance was similar in both organizations. At Ajax Minerals, workers distrusted management and feared that any strategic change would lead to salary reductions or serve as a pretext for action against them. At Perrier, the workforce became deeply insecure following the Nestlé takeover and resisted change out of fear of job loss.

Despite the similarity in the source and character of the resistance, the two companies responded in markedly different ways. Ajax Minerals chose to win employees' confidence by holding interactive sessions and granting them access to confidential company data. This approach succeeded in building trust, and workers began actively contributing to the company's new strategic direction. Perrier, by contrast, made little effort to involve employees in the recovery process. Given that Nestlé already owned two other well-performing mineral water brands in the same region, it apparently did not consider worker engagement essential to improving its newest acquisition's situation or labor relations.

Ajax Minerals clearly handled the situation more effectively. By engaging employees directly, it overcame internal resistance and created conditions for collaborative strategy development. Perrier's failure to take a similar approach left its labor conflicts unresolved and its organizational performance depressed. According to research on organizational change at Harvard Business Review, employee involvement is a critical factor in successful change initiatives — a lesson Ajax Minerals applied and Perrier neglected.

2 Locked Sections · 420 words remaining
61% of this paper shown

Recommended Adjustments for Ajax Minerals · 230 words

"Worker education and performance-based incentive proposals"

Recommended Adjustments for Perrier · 190 words

"Communication, negotiation, and job-security assurance proposals"

Sign Up Now — Instant AccessAlready a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examplesAI writing assistantCitation generatorCancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
Resistance to Change Open-Book Management Labor Union Relations Crisis Management Employee Engagement Organizational Change Change Strategy Worker Incentives Nestlé Acquisition Benzene Contamination
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Ajax Minerals vs. Perrier: Managing Resistance to Change. PaperDue. https://paperdue.com/study-guide/ajax-minerals-perrier-resistance-to-change-190976

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.