Essay Topic Hub

Written Contract
Essays

56+ paper examples, study guides & outlines

56 papers
1 subject area
UG & Grad levels
Free to browse
About This Topic

A written contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties recorded in a formal document, as opposed to an oral arrangement. In law and business courses, this topic receives significant attention because written contracts form the practical foundation of commercial relationships, employment arrangements, and the exchange of goods and services. Students explore how the written form creates enforceable obligations, establishes clear guidelines for each party, and provides a reliable basis for resolving disputes when agreements break down.

The papers archived on this topic approach written contracts from several directions. Some focus on contract law principles broadly, including what constitutes a breach and how remedies are structured. Others take a case-study approach, examining specific disputes such as employment contract questions involving oral versus written agreements. Comparative and applied angles also appear, with papers analyzing consensual relationship agreements in workplace settings, copyright law, and the employment-at-will doctrine, all of which depend on understanding how written agreements function as evidence of the parties' intentions.

A strong essay on written contracts should establish a focused thesis around a specific legal question — such as enforceability, the role of written evidence in proving terms, or the distinction between written and oral contracts in a defined context. Evidence drawn from statutory guidelines, case law, and the practical requirements for contracts covering goods and services tends to carry the most weight. A common pitfall is treating "written contract" as a single uniform concept; effective essays acknowledge that different jurisdictions and contract types impose distinct formal requirements, and that analysis must account for those distinctions clearly.

56 papers
Sort by:
Essay Doctorate
Case Study Contract Law
The basic elements of a contract are offer, acceptance and consideration. In this instance, the two parties have agreed to a specific good (consideration) and a specific price. Some specs were written down informally,…
Paper Doctorate
Looking at Unilateral and Implied Contract
¶ … contract while the other on unilateral contract.
Paper Masters
The Scope of Work
A contractor (C) contracted with owner (O) to build a 30,000 SF of 5-story pipe rack and piping with a very simple changes clause allowing, "changes within the general scope of the work." Must C perform an order to do…
Paper Masters
Drugs in the Workplace Case Study Analysis
¶ … David Gates' arrest as a consequence of him being in possession of a significant quantity of illegal substances is intriguing when considering the context of the plant that he was working for deciding to suspend him.
Paper Doctorate
Business Law the Author of This Report
The author of this report has been asked to answer regarding several different legal and/or ethic cases or questions. Those cases/situations are Wrench LLC vs. Taco Bell, California & Hawaiian Sugar Company vs.
Paper Doctorate
Contract and common law principles
The author of this report is asked to look at the case study of Rami and his impatience related to selling his property in New York City. The questions that will be answered include whether a contract was formed,…
Paper Doctorate
Human Resource Management: Employees vs. Independent Contractors
John, who owns his own consulting firm, is picked to work for Make-a-Bed, a furniture manufacturer and distributor, and since he is not readily available as a full time employee, it is agreed that he should work as…
Essay Doctorate
Johnson Bank v. George Korbaken Company Johnson
In this paper, we are going to be looking at the role of auditors in the financial information provided to banks. This will be accomplished by carefully examining Johnson Bank v. George Korbakes Company. To understand what is happening requires focusing on: on the case itself, the primary / secondary legal questions, the rule of law, the court's decision / opinion on the case, the outcome and if it would have been decided differently in 2012.
Paper Undergraduate
Predators: ecological roles and behavior
Businesses often engage in predatory practices to deter their competitors from entering their market niches or send their competitors out of business. Certain business ventures usually reduce their prices to destroy…
Paper Doctorate
Danville Airlines the Ethical and Legal Consequences
The ethical and legal consequences of testing employees without their knowledge or consent puts Danville Airlines into a defensive position, having to both explain to David Reiger why they are not letting him fly, and potentially to his attorneys how the testing took place at all. The issue of genetics testing raises ethical and legal conflicts, creating a paradox for companies who practice this type of screening (Howard, Richardson, Thorpe, 2009). Danville Airlines has been negligent in their process of medical screening, allowing samples taken from Reiger to be sent to a genetics screening lab (Darden, 2004). Especially detrimental to Reiger is the emotional trauma and pain of being diagnosed with Huntington's disease, the same disease which took his father's life as well (Darden, 2004). Danville is now in the paradoxical situation of having told people outside the company of Reiger's condition, also informing Reiger he will no longer be allowed to fly for the airline, in addition to still not taking steps to fix the several lack of compliance and oversight in its Human Resources Department (Darden, 2004). Even if the screening was technically legal and the attorneys for Danville successfully argue that the genetic testing results are binding, it still doesn't excuse the company from violating Reiger's rights as defined by the 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act (Avitabile, Jappelli, Padula, 2011). It also doesn't excuse the fact that this data, so detrimental to his ability to earn a living, is now out in public with those outside the company, as the case suggests (Darden, 2004). By allowing this to happen, Danville is now in violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. The intent of this paper is to analyze the case and provide a series of recommendations on how Danville can mitigate the losses from their negligence.