This paper analyzes YouTube's role as a social support platform, focusing on its impact on social work practice, individual identity formation, community building, and psychological well-being. Using a literature-based approach, the essay explores how video-sharing technology bridges geographical distances and enables peer support—particularly for individuals with severe mental illness—while examining emerging ethical issues including boundary breaches, exploitation, and liability. The paper concludes by situating YouTube within an anti-oppressive framework, highlighting concerns around gender, privacy, and representation in online social support networks.
Way before the Internet exploded, Marshall McLuhan (1964) observed that "the medium is the message." His statement remains profoundly applicable in our society today, where the Internet is instrumental in communication. Communication technology has grown exponentially and cannot be ignored in the current environment. It has fundamentally altered the way people interact, how we learn, and how we entertain ourselves. Because of this exponential growth in information sharing and electronic communication, pioneers in social support have developed innovative ways to use communication technology for treatment (Huang and Alessi 1996; Murphy and Mitchell 1998; Smith and Reynolds 2002) and to deliver interventions online (Mishna et al. 2012).
This essay establishes how social networking sites have impacted the practice of social support while examining the ethical issues that arise. Specifically, it addresses how social networking sites have influenced social and personal identities, the ways these platforms have shaped functional and geographical communities, the psychological implications of social networking engagement, and the significance of social networking through anti-oppressive dimensions. This analysis is conducted through literature review, with YouTube as the focal case study.
YouTube, founded in 2005, is a video-sharing platform and one of the most popular websites globally. Videos on YouTube originate from all over the world, are available in different languages, and reach audiences across the United States—often exceeding the reach of any particular cable network. As a free, accessible platform requiring only an Internet connection, YouTube has become a venue where people increasingly seek health advice and share personal experiences. With the growth of social media, questions have emerged about whether people will turn to platforms like YouTube for support related to severe mental illness (SMI) (Naslund et al. 2014).
In recent years, people have begun viewing social media as more than a space for casual expression—recognizing it as a meaningful resource when other forms of support may be inaccessible (Norval et al. 2011). According to Naslund et al. (2014), YouTube ranks as the third major social networking site by user accounts, following only Facebook and Google+. YouTube's key features—user account creation, channel subscriptions, free access, open video uploading, commenting, and video sharing—make it a powerful networking tool with significant potential for social work and peer support.
As the saying goes, a problem shared is a problem half solved. YouTube's availability in 61 different languages means that anyone with Internet access can view, upload, comment on, and share videos. Although certain risks accompany health information disclosure online, YouTube has rapidly become a venue where people and patients share experiences or seek information from others facing similar situations.
Social media creates opportunities for people to build connections, receive and give support, and share experiences. Various groups have formed on Facebook for different illnesses, with videos posted on YouTube and forums—such as PatientsLikeMe—established to discuss and share experiences. Despite widespread social media use, less attention has been given to its role for people with severe mental illness (Naslund et al. 2014).
Individuals with severe mental illness are likely to share their views through blogs, build relationships via social media, or use the Internet to find information about their conditions. Social media offers a non-threatening medium that enables connection with others from the safety and comfort of home. However, uncertainty remains about how social media can best be leveraged to provide peer support among SMI individuals (Naslund et al. 2014).
YouTube has fundamentally changed social support practice by eliminating the requirement for physical contact between support provider and recipient. Where distance and time are barriers to face-to-face communication, YouTube bridges the gap. A support provider can record a video message, upload it to YouTube, and share it with the intended audience. This platform offers storage capabilities unavailable through instant video chat applications (Naslund et al. 2014). In this way, YouTube has broadened social support practice by enabling provider-client, provider-provider, and client-client networking.
On YouTube, people from all walks of life search for health information and share stories and experiences. Analysis of YouTube videos and comments from individuals with multiple sclerosis, for example, reveals that many disclose personal conditions publicly and upload videos offering advice or treatment suggestions to others with the same diagnosis (Naslund et al. 2014).
With growing social media adoption, professionals are beginning to explore social media's potential and establish guidelines governing patient-professional interactions (Brown 2010; Judd and Johnston 2012). This rapid evolution has significant implications for the field. Cyber communication is now universal and unavoidable. Rather than adopting policies that prohibit such communication, professionals must recognize that clients will always find practitioner contact information online (Mishna et al. 2012).
YouTube significantly affects an individual's social identity, particularly when uploaded videos are relevant and resonate across a broad user base (Naslund et al. 2014). Video popularity on YouTube is primarily measured by view count and, to some extent, by shares. Videos with higher view counts rank as more relevant within their niche. When a social support provider's video receives substantial views, it increases the provider's visibility and recognition among those seeking support. This visibility directly strengthens the provider's social identity within the support community.
From another perspective, political correctness (PC) discourses often avoid explicitly discussing marginalized social groups, potentially leaving group members feeling alienated. On one side stand individuals who perceive threats from the claims and demands of historically disadvantaged groups, manifesting as right-wing backlash. Such perceived threats to group identity and privileges have been linked to specific psychological responses. Spears, Doosje, and Ellemers (1997) found that when threatened, individuals with strong group identification increase self-stereotyping. Jetten, Spears, and Manstead (1997) documented heightened in-group bias under threat conditions. Grant (1993) demonstrated that threats to group identity intensify intergroup differentiation (Lalonde et al. 2000).
Individuals identifying as Black, gay, lesbian, or feminist are more likely to believe the PC-basher stereotype and less likely to accept the PC-crusader stereotype. These beliefs suggest individuals perceive other groups as threatening their own group's ideologies (Lalonde et al. 2000).
Group differences in PC perceptions reflect differing belief systems. Feminists and their supporters were less likely to accept the PC-basher stereotype across both traditional and non-traditional respondent groups. Self-identified feminists scored significantly lower on conservative attitude measures (protestant ethic, right-wing authoritarianism, and ideological meritocracy) compared to both traditional and non-traditional respondents (Lalonde et al. 2000). Feminists and their supporters used the term "political correctness" more frequently than other groups.
Clear differences emerged between heterosexual and gay/lesbian respondents. Heterosexuals more strongly believed the PC-crusader stereotype, while gay and lesbian individuals held stronger beliefs in the PC-basher stereotype (Lalonde et al. 2000).
No predicted differences were found between White and Black respondents regarding the two stereotypes. One notable difference emerged: self-identified White people used the term "PC" in conversation more frequently (M = 2.26) than Black respondents (M = 1.50, t(43) = 4.15, p < 0.001) (Lalonde et al. 2000).
The term "community" in online contexts mirrors its offline usage, reflecting similar cultural and structural dimensions. Just as offline communities resist simple definition, so too do online communities. Hillery's (1955) foundational definition describes community as "a collection of people engaged in social interaction, within a geographic area, that has one or more additional ties" (Rotman and Preece 2010).
For geographical communities, YouTube has delivered world-class social support services to remote regions. By providing access to professional expertise and encouragement from people experiencing similar challenges, YouTube has enabled isolated individuals to shed feelings of loneliness and develop hope for managing their conditions (Skeels et al. 2010).
Another significant contribution involves addressing physical appearance and self-acceptance. Physical attractiveness carries substantial cultural weight in many societies, and individuals perceived as less attractive may face social disadvantage. Appearance affects employment opportunities and relationship prospects. Therefore, practitioners must attend to features influencing social functioning—including dental health, body build, gait, facial features, and any characteristics that may shape self-image or create social stigma (Hepworth et al. 2010).
Youth particularly depend on information technology for communication. Young people use the Internet and related technologies far more than other media for connecting with peers (Kaynay and Yelsma 2000). Indeed, young people prefer the Internet to television (Mishna et al. 2012).
Technology has become integral to social work, fundamentally changing practice. As cyber technology has influenced communication across populations, it is revolutionizing interactions between clients and practitioners. Core practice elements—boundaries, information disclosure, legal and ethical considerations, and procedures and policies—have all shifted (Mishna et al. 2012).
Cyber communication encompasses social networks, texting, and email. Many practitioners use these tools for practical purposes such as scheduling; however, many also use them therapeutically. They recognize the value of these tools and want to meet clients' communication preferences, recognizing that respecting client choice is central to social work (Bogo 2006). Adoption of cyber technologies is reshaping social interactions, entertainment preferences, and learning strategies. Notably, there has been a significant increase in the use of social networking for accessing social services, driven by tools including text messaging, social media, email, instant messaging, blogs, webcams, and related platforms (Mishna et al. 2012).
Kuss and Griffiths (2012) argue that the boundary between the real and virtual worlds has become dangerously blurred, particularly for teenage social media users. For some individuals, psychological experience of the real and virtual worlds is indistinguishable. Such individuals may cease living in the real world, conflating their virtual actions with real-world consequences. However, as Novotney (2012) counters, a clear distinction exists between the real and virtual worlds, and users bear responsibility for maintaining that distinction.
Although YouTube has provided valuable social support and expanded social networks, it creates risk of exploitation by untrained or unprofessional self-proclaimed providers. This presents the danger of client harm through scams (Reamer 2013).
Professional care providers using YouTube face potential legal liability (Kudushin 2012). When a professional disseminates support information publicly on YouTube, any user can access and apply it. If results fall short of expectations, users may sue the provider for damages. To mitigate this risk, every professional should attach clear disclaimers to public videos.
"Legal liability, boundary breaches, and exploitation require safeguards"
"Gender, privacy, and representation shape equitable platform use"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.