This paper examines the intersection of spirituality, reproductive autonomy, and cultural faith traditions as pathways to women's empowerment. Through analysis of Amy Everhart's poem "Accidents," ethnographic work on women's spiritual roles, and Sikh feminist perspectives, the paper argues that women gain agency and social authority when they control reproductive choices, occupy spiritual leadership positions, and embrace faith traditions centered on gender equality. The paper demonstrates how spirituality provides women with community, self-worth, and activism platforms, while reproductive rights—including access to diverse birth options, contraception, and abortion—constitute foundational choices necessary for autonomous self-determination.
The concept of reproductive privilege is central to the proper interpretation of Amy Everhart's poem "Accidents." One may successfully argue that Everhart's poem is actually about reproductive privilege and her deprivation of such privilege because of her sexual orientation. The concept of reproductive privilege refers to the biological reality that some people—based on their sexual orientation—are able to reproduce biologically within nature, whereas others are not. Specifically, heterosexual people are able to reproduce when they have sex with one another, while homosexual people cannot biologically conceive children together.
Heteronormativity greatly supports this notion of reproductive privilege because reproduction biologically requires heterosexual activity. What is most interesting about Everhart's poem is the fact that this privilege, like all privileges, is both abused by some and denied to others. The poet spends the majority of this work discussing her love for another woman and their inability to create children from this love. As such, they are excluded from the privilege of reproducing when they have sex.
The counterpart to this aspect of the poem is suggested by the title and alluded to in a reference to a young man and his interaction with a woman named "Amanda." It is fairly obvious from the author's writing that this pair is having a child they did not intend to create. The poet actually refers to this child as "an accident" with "a face." The fact that the baby created by this pair was unintended implies that they are abusing the notion of reproductive privilege which their heterosexual activity enables. The poet envies this privilege, which is made possible when a man has sex with a woman.
Shaw and Lee have elucidated numerous ways in which women of faith have utilized their spirituality to empower one another. One of the most important ways they have done so is by asserting their power in religious or spiritual terms, which translates into power in social contexts. Quite simply, when women play vital roles in spiritual practices—such as the female "santeras" in Caribbean culture—they also tend to have social eminence associated with them in the larger social setting in which their religion is practiced.
This notion is demonstrated profoundly in Horn-Miller's essay "Bring us back into the dance." The author, who is of Native American descent, refers to a crisis in which a young woman attempted to take her own life. Although the problem affected the entirety of the community, it is vital to note that the community turned to a spiritual woman for guidance about how to proceed. Specifically, as one community member recalls, a woman in the longhouse community—keeper of traditional ways—consulted resources to help the community respond. This example demonstrates how empowering spirituality is for women, as it can place them at the forefront of a movement which the entire community depends upon.
Additionally, women can find spirituality in the sense that in certain domestic and community settings, one of the few places in which they can become assertive and lead is within religious or spiritual contexts. These settings also enable them to experience real community with other women. Moreover, religion can help women to find their own sense of self-worth and to become activists within a larger community. All of these mechanisms help women to empower themselves through spirituality and religious practice.
Perhaps the most important choice that Shaw and Lee discuss is the fact that women should have options for giving birth. Options indicate that women have a plurality of choices—or at least more than one. Those choices should not be dangerous and they should not be exceedingly costly. If they were either dangerous or prohibitively expensive, they would not be viable options for mothers to begin their parenting journey.
The second choice that Shaw and Lee deem necessary regarding reproduction is that women and men should have a number of birth control options from which to choose. It is important to recognize that the authors believe these choices should be trustworthy, not dangerous, and inexpensive. They should involve different types of methods so that couples can have a variety of options which ideally protect them in different ways.
The third necessity for reproductive autonomy is highly important in that it allows women to choose whether or not they want an abortion. In addition to being able to choose whether or not to have such a procedure, this necessity implies that abortions are safe, inexpensive, and reliable. Finally, the authors believe that women should have the right to produce children when they want to. In this respect, they should not be tricked or forced into becoming sterile. Reproductive autonomy, in this view, encompasses the full spectrum of fertility decisions.
"Women's options for birth settings and medical intervention"
"Gender equality embedded in Sikh tradition reinforcing personal feminism"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.