This paper examines the United States' historical and constitutional reliance on the National Guard, with particular focus on World War II. It traces the Guard's origins under the U.S. Constitution, the isolationist political climate of the interwar years, and the severe underfunding that left American armed forces ranked seventeenth globally by 1939. The paper analyzes General George Marshall's efforts to expand Army and Guard manpower, the legislative role of Congress, and the National Guard Association's political influence. It concludes by assessing the Guard's direct contributions to Allied victory — including rapid mobilization, adaptation to mechanized warfare, and the leadership of experienced officers — and its transformation into a permanent pillar of U.S. national defense.
The National Guard is a militia of the United States of America. The U.S. Constitution has authorized this militia and specified its different functions and roles within both the federal and state governments. According to Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, Congress has been granted the authority "to call forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions" ("National Guard," 2013). The power to organize, arm, and discipline the militia was granted to Congress; however, it remained the responsibility of the individual states to appoint officers and train the militia. The Second Amendment contained further provisions regarding the regulation of the militia ("National Guard," 2013).
In general, the National Guard is answerable to state jurisdiction during peacetime. Governors have the authority to suppress local unrest and disorder using the National Guard. The 1967 riots in Newark and Detroit are examples of governors employing the National Guard to manage overwhelming domestic circumstances. The National Guard is also used to assist in local-level disasters such as floods, earthquakes, and severe storms. In wartime, the National Guard is incorporated into the United States' active service, with the President acting as commander-in-chief ("National Guard," 2013).
The equipment and human resources of the National Guard are standardized to match U.S. Army regulations. Recruitment and mobilization are voluntary, and the federal government is responsible for compensating those who serve. Volunteers are paid even for time spent in field training or drill periods ("National Guard," 2013).
The armed forces of Nazi Germany were unleashed by Adolf Hitler on the morning of September 1, 1939, against Poland. The people of Europe, already fearful of another war after the brutal conflict of World War I, watched anxiously for the response of France and Great Britain. Both powers had previously accepted Hitler's demands and threats. However, when Hitler violated the Munich Agreement, the Allies made the firm decision to stand behind Poland. They declared war on September 3, after which the world witnessed the brutal events of World War II (Sligh & Beaumont, 1992).
It is important to note that after World War I, Americans were determined to stay out of European conflicts. The American government and people quickly concluded that their participation in World War I had been a costly mistake, and that they must avoid involvement in future wars. They adopted policies aimed at reducing international tensions while maintaining a strong defensive military posture. The late 1920s proved an especially difficult period as the country suffered through the Great Depression, which caused millions of Americans to endure prolonged hardship. Although the Great Depression affected other countries as well, it was in the United States that people continued to suffer for many years (Winkler, 2000).
Moreover, the United Kingdom and France had been indebted to the United States but failed to repay those debts when America needed them most. This perceived betrayal prompted the United States to revise its foreign policy, adopting a strategy of neutrality and turning inward. The country embraced a policy of isolationism and self-reliance, focusing primarily on domestic affairs. These were the principal reasons why the American government and people resisted entering World War II (Winkler, 2000).
It was not entirely surprising to Americans that Europe had become embroiled in yet another brutal war, as this outcome had been predicted by early twentieth-century isolationists. Many Americans believed that European antagonism, domestic political rivalries, and longstanding grudges would inevitably lead to violent conflict (Sligh & Beaumont, 1992).
Nevertheless, President Roosevelt was deeply troubled by events in Europe. During his first term he had focused primarily on domestic problems, but his anxiety grew in the late 1930s as he observed the rising ambitions of Italy, Germany, and Japan, convincing him that the United States would unavoidably be drawn into World War II (Fleming, 2001). Given the isolationist attitudes of Congress and the American public, he devised a plan to rebuild the nation's defenses while ensuring that Hitler's opponents received substantial aid. As the historian Robert A. Divine noted, "Roosevelt shared the isolationist desire to keep the United States out of armed conflict, yet he also followed a seemingly interventionist policy of rendering aid to anti-fascist nations" (Sligh & Beaumont, 1992, p. 5).
As Europe became engulfed in war in September 1939, the United States Army ranked seventeenth in the world (Doubler, 2003). To augment this force, the National Guard could play a decisive role, even though the militia was neither well-equipped nor adequately trained for a conflict of such scale. When President Roosevelt assessed the situation, however, he moved quickly to approve an increase in the Guard's size and authorize more appropriate training for its volunteers. Even so, this fell short of what the Army believed was necessary to prepare soldiers for modern warfare. Roosevelt remained cautious about committing to such consequential action for a public that was, for the most part, isolationist in outlook (Sligh & Beaumont, 1992).
The Army, too, was reluctant to undertake the training and reorganization of the National Guard. One major reason the United States ultimately chose to rely on the Guard during World War II was that the Guard's officer corps was represented by the National Guard Association, which possessed one of the most effective political lobbies of that era (Sligh & Beaumont, 1992).
This inescapable involvement in World War II placed the U.S. Army and General George Catlett Marshall, who had just been installed as Chief of Staff, in a difficult position. They faced the critical challenge of acquiring sufficient men and materiel to defend the United States and the Western Hemisphere against any expansion of the European war. Like Roosevelt, Marshall encountered opposition from a Congress heavily influenced by isolationist, conservative, and parochial politics (Bunting, 2005). In addition, the National Guard Association of the United States (NGA) complicated Marshall's task, as it operated as a quasi-independent military force with strong ties to the political lobby (Sligh & Beaumont, 1992).
As the voice of the Guard's officer corps, the NGA sought federal funding and a prominent role in national defense. Yet both Marshall and the NGA failed to foresee that World War II would fundamentally transform the way American society raised and maintained its armed forces for the next four decades. In time, neither the Army nor the National Guard would resemble what they had been before the war (Sligh & Beaumont, 1992).
The Army that General Craig had handed over to Marshall was far from strong. As noted, it ranked seventeenth in the world. Despite Roosevelt's persistent lobbying of Congress to increase defense spending, the U.S. Army numbered only about 180,000 officers and men. Some 50,000 troops were stationed in Hawaii and other territories outside the continental United States, including the Philippine Islands and the Panama Canal Zone (Sligh & Beaumont, 1992).
Within the continental United States, units were dispersed across one hundred and thirty posts — remnants of the Indian Wars era for the most part (Doubler, 2003). Nine infantry divisions and two cavalry divisions formed the combat units, yet these existed largely as paper organizations: none were anywhere close to authorized peacetime strength. The Second Division, the largest, had approximately ten thousand men — still four thousand short of its required number (Sligh & Beaumont, 1992).
"Congressional funding cuts and Marshall's strategic challenge"
"Marshall secures presidential approval and Guard recruitment surges"
"Guard's operational contributions and citizen-soldier performance"
It is undoubtedly correct that the National Guard units played an integral part in the victories of the United States in both World Wars, especially in World War II. In both conflicts, the National Guard divisions functioned as a prepared and solid force, organizing and deploying rapidly as soon as hostilities began. Without the National Guard's involvement in World War II, the initial American ground response might have taken considerably longer than the several months it actually required. While the primary fighting burden in winning World War II ultimately fell on draftees, the National Guard made a tremendous contribution by buying the time needed for Army units to assemble, train, and prepare to confront the enemy (Doubler, 2003).
You’re 46% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.