This paper examines the potential impact of transitioning from the United States' current market-based healthcare system to a universal healthcare model. Drawing on research by Zieff et al. (2020) and Galvani et al. (2020), the paper highlights significant disparities in healthcare access, particularly among low-income populations who face higher rates of chronic conditions such as type II diabetes and obesity. It discusses the estimated economic savings of a single-payer system—approximately $450 billion annually—while acknowledging the logistical and financial challenges of such a transition. The paper also considers the role of the Affordable Care Act and argues that universal, inclusive healthcare is essential for achieving sustainable public health and long-term economic viability in the United States.
This paper illustrates how universal healthcare may lead to a healthier population in America and assist in mitigating the long-term economic costs of an unhealthy nation. Significant disparities exist in the United States, where citizens within lower socioeconomic groups are exposed to decreased quality of healthcare access and increased rates of chronic non-communicable conditions such as type II diabetes and obesity, among other poor health determinants (Zieff et al., 2020). Although the implementation of universal healthcare would be challenging and complicated, transitioning from a market-based system to a universal system is considered vital (Galvani et al., 2020). Universal healthcare would better encourage and facilitate preventive, sustainable health practices while also proving more economically beneficial in the long term for the public health of the United States.
The literature illustrates both the advantages and disadvantages of universal healthcare in the United States. Among the drawbacks are significant logistical challenges and substantial upfront costs. On the other hand, while per capita healthcare expenditure in the United States is already higher than in most other countries, over 37 million Americans currently lack health insurance, and more than 42 million citizens do not have access to adequate care (Zieff et al., 2020). Even though current attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act would worsen healthcare inequalities, a universal system such as the one proposed in the Medicare for All Act (MAA) has the potential to transform the efficiency and availability of American healthcare.
Research estimates that a single-payer, universal healthcare system would likely result in a 13% reduction in national healthcare spending, amounting to approximately $450 billion annually, when both the costs of coverage expansion and the savings realized through the MAA are taken into account (Zieff et al., 2020). Through health premiums and existing government funding, the entire system could potentially be financed with less financial outlay than is currently borne by businesses and individuals (Galvani et al., 2020). Lower-income residents would benefit the most from the move to single-payer healthcare. According to these calculations, guaranteeing every American access to healthcare would save nearly 68,000 lives and 1.73 million life-years annually.
"How inequitable systems worsen disparities and neglect prevention"
"ACA legacy and threats from political opposition"
We can only achieve genuine public health on an economically viable road through universal and inclusive healthcare (Zieff et al., 2020). While the transition presents real challenges, the long-term benefits — in lives saved, disparities reduced, and costs contained — make a compelling case for systemic reform. This paper has provided an extensive illustration of the importance of shifting toward universal healthcare in place of the current market-based system.
You’re 57% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.