This reflective essay explores a graduating student's growing reluctance to pursue a corporate business career in light of high-profile ethical failures. Drawing on real-world cases—including the Chinese melamine milk scandal, the Enron collapse, AIG's bailout bonus controversy, and pet food contamination—the author examines how unethical business practices, a lack of corporate accountability, and inadequate regulation erode trust in the business world. The essay weighs options such as targeting ethically responsible employers like Starbucks and Patagonia, and ultimately concludes that launching an independent business may be the most viable path to maintaining personal ethical standards.
To: Whom It May Concern
Re: Why I Am Hesitant to Pursue a Career in Business
Date: October 23, 2009
In a tough economy, most people would probably take any job they can get after graduating from college. However, as graduation draws nearer, I find myself becoming more and more hesitant when I think about launching a career in business. It seems there are so many unethical companies out there that will do anything to make money — even if it costs lives in the process. I am not talking only about Enron and AIG, who preyed on their customers and ruined the lives of many investors and employees. I am talking about companies that knowingly engage in unethical business practices simply because they can. Consider the Chinese company that included melamine in its pet food and killed hundreds of innocent pets.
Even worse, another Chinese company added the same chemical to babies' milk, and Chinese officials covered up the scandal for months, making a terrible situation far more devastating. Over 300,000 children were affected, and dozens died, although officials would not confirm exactly how many lives were lost — they may not have known themselves. I find this horrific and deeply disturbing. After the melamine scandal involving pet food, how could any company possibly use the same chemical in human food? How could they even consider putting it in baby formula? I cannot imagine how those responsible can look themselves in the mirror each morning, and the scandal makes me question business practices around the world.
When did it become acceptable to maximize profit at the expense of others? When did cutting costs to the point of endangering lives become standard practice? I cannot believe that stakeholders in these companies would condone such behavior, yet it is happening — and it makes me question my own future in business. Do I want to be involved with a company that operates this way? No. I would rather be unemployed.
Another glaring example comes to mind: the banks and financial institutions that accepted government bailout funds and then paid their employees exorbitant bonuses. They rewarded staff for behavior that had nearly destroyed their institutions — and they did it with taxpayers' money. How could anyone consider that the right thing to do? It was morally and ethically wrong, yet they did it and faced few real consequences. It makes me question the core business values of this country and, once again, my own career aspirations. Do I really want to work for companies with values like that? No. I would rather be unemployed.
One of the foundations of ethics and responsibility — in business as in personal life — is accountability and empathy for those around you. I truly feel for the Chinese parents of the babies who became ill and died, and it breaks my heart to think of their pain. I cannot believe that the businesses involved in this scandal possessed any of that empathy or sense of responsibility; if they had, they never would have used that chemical in the first place. That means they were morally and ethically compromised, and I find myself wondering what other questionable practices they engage in. What would a company like that expect of me as an employee? That thought frightens me, and deepens my hesitation about a career in modern business.
"Starbucks and Patagonia as ethical employer examples"
"Entrepreneurship as solution to ethical concerns"
Even after writing this, I still do not fully understand how companies like the ones described above can engage in such reckless business practices. As I said, I do not know how the people in charge ever look at themselves in the mirror again. There is another important question that demands an answer as well: after you have betrayed your customers so profoundly, how do you ever rebuild their trust? That is an aspect of ethics and responsibility that often gets overlooked. If Enron returned to the market today, would you trust them or invest in them? I would not — I would steer as far clear of them as possible. Yet AIG and similar institutions continue to operate as if it were business as usual, and that frightens me. People seem to become outraged quickly and then move on to the next issue, instantly forgetting their anger and fear.
It is yet another reason I am hesitant to start a career in business. Nothing seems to get resolved at the macro level. AIG is still in business, and Enron would likely be too had it not gone bankrupt. I believe there should be stronger regulation of businesses, and I feel that way because it is clear they cannot adequately regulate themselves. If they could, we would not be reading stories about babies dying from tainted milk, investors losing their savings to Ponzi schemes, and all the other accounts of bad business practices that flood the media. Starting my own business and running it ethically feels like the most honest solution to my hesitation about pursuing a career in big business.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.