This paper examines the challenges small and medium enterprises (SMEs) face when attempting to implement Six Sigma quality management practices. It begins by defining SMEs through their key organizational characteristics — including entrepreneurial leadership, flexible production, and hierarchical decision-making — and then identifies the structural and resource-based limitations that make Six Sigma adoption difficult. The paper argues that cost, limited human resources, and logistics integration are the primary barriers SMEs encounter, contrasting their constraints with the relative ease large enterprises have in deploying quality control systems. Drawing on research from the Journal of Small Business Management, the paper concludes that broader access to financial and HR resources would significantly improve SME capacity for quality improvement.
Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are defined by a number of telltale characteristics, not the least of which is the entrepreneur as "a key figure in business operations" (Bigras & Gelinas, 2004, p. 253). Within an SME's organizational structure, processes are often simpler than those of large enterprises. In many cases, an owner-manager is responsible for carrying out the corporate vision and translating objectives into action-oriented processes (Filion, 1991, p. 45). SMEs are typically defined by a high need for achievement and success, as well as independence and autonomy (Bigras & Gelinas, 2004). Many focus on the effectiveness rather than the efficiency of their processes.
SMEs are also defined by greater flexibility with respect to production capabilities (Bigras & Gelinas, 2004; Filion, 1991). They are typically characterized by less comprehensive bureaucracies and greater versatility in production. Many adapt well to environmental changes (Bigras & Gelinas, 2004). SMEs are also much smaller than large enterprises and, as a result, typically entail independent units of management that may depend heavily on the experience of top management or the owner-manager (Bigras & Gelinas, 2004). More often than not, SMEs rely on hierarchical structures for support, which can allow the decision-making process to move more swiftly.
Strategic planning in the SME is often dictated by the environment and by the organization's perception of changes in that environment over both the short and long term (Bigras & Gelinas, 2004). SMEs often rely less on standardized processes than do larger organizations, making Six Sigma implementation more challenging and frequently a more time-consuming effort.
Aragon-Sanchez and Sanchez-Marin (2005) also define SMEs by their flexibility, organizational processes, and hierarchical management style. They suggest that SMEs are often defined by proactive and innovative strategies that enable cooperation agreements with other firms (p. 287). The authors further suggest that a strategic overhaul in SMEs is more cost-prohibitive and may affect an organization's culture more profoundly than it would in a large enterprise environment.
Six Sigma is a quality-driven process that requires organizational processes to produce nearly flawless execution. It calls on organizations to deliver what the customer wants, needs, and seeks, and to ensure that predictable processes are in place to improve customer experiences. Predictable business processes, however, are often difficult to establish in the SME environment.
Six Sigma integration often requires logistics integration, which has historically been one of the more prevalent challenges SMEs face in managing processes (Bigras & Gelinas, 2004, p. 263). SMEs must often change their operational and organizational styles to conform to Six Sigma strategies, replacing traditional ways of doing business with more integrated systems that help synchronize transactions (Bigras & Gelinas, 2004, p. 263). This is particularly challenging for smaller organizations where the replacement of existing management methods or integrated practices is not feasible in most situations.
"HR and financial limits blocking implementation"
If more HR and financial resources were readily available — even in the SME environment — then the likelihood that strategic controls and quality controls could be implemented successfully is much greater, and the risk of excessive financial burden to the organization would be considerably reduced.
You’re 72% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.