Singapore Airlines Strategy: Quality, Delegation, and Growth

Overview of Singapore Airlines

Singapore Airlines (SIA) is the flagship carrier of Singapore, based out of Changi Airport. It has a strong presence across most of Asia and operates the so-called "Kangaroo Routes" connecting the West to Australia and New Zealand. SIA is an innovative company, operating two of the world's longest non-stop commercial flights — Singapore to Los Angeles and Singapore to Newark. It was the launch customer for the Airbus A380 Superjumbo and has diversified into a range of airline-related operations, including aircraft handling, Silk Air, and Singapore Airlines Cargo. SIA also holds a 49% share in Virgin Atlantic.

As of December 2010, SIA was the second largest airline in the world by net worth, valued at approximately $14 billion. In the 2009–2010 fiscal year, the airline posted nearly $11 billion (U.S.) in revenues, with a net income of $227 million.

As one of the most admired airlines in the industry, SIA's strategy for delivering continuous quality encompasses six major points: democratic organization, small units to carry out tasks, delegation of authority, creating an environment where delegated responsibility can be used effectively, training and retraining objectives, and a more egalitarian approach to departments — where no single department is considered more important than another.

Comparatively speaking, the airline maintains high standards of service and is able to professionally deliver stakeholder equity with regular fiscal improvement. SIA performs better than most carriers in these areas — but the critical question is whether the airline follows its own publicly stated strategy in both strategic and tactical operations.

Six-Point Quality Strategy

When each of the six key points is examined closely, it becomes clear that SIA does not always fulfill its stated strategies across the full range of its operations:

Democratic Organization: This is largely a public relations statement. In practice, decisions are still made at the upper echelons of management and filter down to groups below, usually without meaningful dialog or discourse.

Small Units: SIA does separate its operations into small units structured as fully owned subsidiaries — 25 subsidiaries, 32 associates, and 2 joint ventures. This aspect of the strategy is structurally implemented, though its spirit of agility is debatable.

Evaluating Strategy Against Practice

Delegation: In practice, delegation amounts to the transfer of responsibility rather than genuine authority. This is illustrated by the decision to eliminate passenger gifts on long flights: the decision was made at the corporate level, yet the responsibility for managing passenger expectations was passed to flight crews who had no authority in the matter.

Units That Use Delegated Authority: From 2003 to 2007, SIA experienced strained relations with employees over salaries and the scope of their authority. Relations improved from 2007 onward and have remained cordial, though disputes often required government mediation to resolve.

Training and Retraining: SIA does meet its training and retraining goals, particularly on long-range flights. There is some evidence of retraining within mechanical and maintenance departments. However, cross-training and mobility across departments remain rare. Flight crews are frequently unable to answer passengers' questions about the countries they visit, reflecting a gap in cultural and destination training for cabin staff.

Egalitarian Department Structures: This principle is more aspirational than operational. Departments continue to function within a hierarchy shaped by revenue contribution and public perception, rather than any genuinely flat organizational model.

As noted in analyses of SIA's organizational culture, the airline's public-facing values and its internal structures do not always converge — a tension common among large, globally competitive carriers.

Conclusion

However, varying gambling laws across countries — and even across regions within countries such as the United States — create significant regulatory complications. Consider a flight from Singapore to Newark via Los Angeles: gambling could be permitted from takeoff until the aircraft enters U.S. airspace near Los Angeles, then would need to cease until the aircraft crosses Nevada airspace, then cease again upon leaving that corridor. As counterintuitive as this enforcement scenario sounds, the fiscal benefits of onboard gambling are likely not sufficient to outweigh the bureaucratic complexity and potential negative public perception such rules would generate.

For a broader understanding of how airlines balance ancillary revenue with passenger experience, the Harvard Business Review's coverage of aviation strategy offers useful industry context.

SIA remains one of the most admired airlines in the world, backed by strong financials and a well-articulated quality framework. However, a consistent gap exists between its publicly stated organizational strategy and its internal operational reality. Democratic ideals, genuine delegation, and egalitarian structures are difficult to sustain at scale, and SIA's experience illustrates the challenges any large carrier faces in aligning corporate rhetoric with day-to-day practice. Ancillary innovations like in-flight gambling further complicate the picture, introducing regulatory and reputational risks that may offset any revenue gains.

Casino Row. (September 7, 1981). Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,924824,00.html

Singapore Airlines — Passenger Reviews. (2010). Skytrax.com. Retrieved from

Singapore Airlines. (1989). Harvard Business School Case Studies. 9-687-022.

Wirtz, J., & Johnston, R. (2001). Singapore Airlines: What it takes to sustain service excellence. NUS Business School Research. Retrieved from