This paper critically reviews Schmitz (2006), a study that uses path analysis and National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLS) data to explore how social and family contexts influence self-esteem among Mexican immigrant youth in the United States. The review evaluates the study's methodology, sample composition, literature review, and findings, including the unexpected absence of a relationship between home environment and global self-esteem. It also assesses the study's strengths—such as its diverse Latino sample and readable prose—alongside its limitations, including underrepresented demographic groups, inadequate cultural measurement, and the absence of qualitative data collection methods such as focus groups.
Schmitz (2006) employs complex modeling analysis to explore the relationship between social and family contexts and the self-esteem of Mexican youth. The rising numbers of immigrants to the United States provides the background for the assessment of this relationship. The author is concerned that the academic progress of Latino children may be linked to their self-esteem. Consequently, factors that assist in understanding self-esteem among this population deserve careful examination. The data for the study were produced by the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLS). The study employed Amos modeling for path analysis. The study determined that social and family factors influenced academic self-esteem. However, there was no significant predictive power for the home environment on global self-esteem.
The use of data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth is a common research practice because this data has been shown to be both reliable and valid. The only challenge to the veracity of the author's work is that the data were not specifically collected for the purpose of the study. This disconnect could potentially introduce construct invalidity into the research.
The study was supported by a literature review that examined the most relevant research relating to self-esteem. The literature review consisted of empirical studies. However, it did not adequately demonstrate the gap in the literature that the researcher was attempting to fill. There was also a need to show how other researchers measured the dependent variable in their work. This concern is critical because the author is using data from a national study. Demonstrating measurement congruence with other studies may have been a useful element for improving the trustworthiness of the study.
"Sample size, diversity, and underrepresented groups"
"Findings on self-esteem and Garcia Coll model"
"Suggested improvements including focus group data"
The overall tone and language used in the study made it easy to read and follow. The author avoided clichés, and the flow of the prose presented a refreshing element within a research context. This quality did not diminish the scholarly nature of the work; rather, it was an enhancement to the piece. It is notable, however, that the work contains no use of Spanish, despite being designed for a predominantly Spanish-speaking audience. The study demonstrated a clear need to examine the role of cultural differences in the development of self-esteem. Culture is an important consideration in many aspects of the human experience. When the issue of culture is conjoined with that of immigration, the result is a situation in which traditional issues become reconfigured in new and diverse patterns.
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.