This paper examines psycholinguistics as a field bridging linguistics and psychology, with particular focus on child language acquisition. It traces the discipline's origins from Francis Galton's word-association experiments through Noam Chomsky's influential theory of transformational-generative grammar and the innate language acquisition device. The paper contrasts Chomsky's nativist position with B.F. Skinner's behaviorist imitation model, surveys universal developmental milestones shared across cultures and languages, and analyzes the critical period hypothesis through the documented cases of Victor of Aveyron and Genie. It concludes by discussing psycholinguistic contributions to reading instruction and the teaching of written language.
Psycholinguistics provides a comprehensive and viable understanding of human language development. The most prominent psycholinguistic theorist, Noam Chomsky, has argued convincingly that human children develop language abilities according to a predetermined universal deep structure, or universal grammar. The psycholinguistic approach offers invaluable tools for teaching children to read, write, and speak.
The development of language in the human child is one of the most astounding and impressive human accomplishments. A child must learn over ten new words each day from the time they start speaking in order to reach the average six-year-old's vocabulary of 14,000 words (McConnell). Language allows humans to think, reason, and communicate with one another. It is an absolutely essential skill, not only for the complete development of the individual, but for the survival of the human species as a whole.
Psycholinguistics deals with the mental aspects of language acquisition, storage, production, and comprehension. It has roots in both linguistics and psychology. Linguists generally study psycholinguistics through observations of spontaneous speech, while psychologists study it under controlled experimental conditions. The word psycholinguistics originated in the 1930s and is derived from a combination of three roots: the Greek psych (mind), the Latin lingua (tongue), and -istics as in statistics (Xrefer).
Psycholinguistics is a subfield within the wider study of language and communication, which includes non-verbal communication. Neurolinguistics is closely related to psycholinguistics but focuses more narrowly on the biological study of language and the brain (Kess).
Psycholinguistics has a relatively long history. Charles Darwin discussed language acquisition briefly in Mind. The first psycholinguistic experiments were conducted by British psychologist Francis Galton in his investigations of word association (McGroarty).
Modern psycholinguistics emerged in the mid-1960s with the work of Noam Chomsky. Chomsky argued that language likely has a genetic component, since all human languages follow certain rules of grammar and syntax. His work generated a wave of subsequent research intent on determining whether his theory of transformational-generative grammar had a solid basis in the real-world ways humans store and process language. Early research attempting to demonstrate Chomsky's theories in real-world situations, including child language acquisition, produced disappointing initial results. Chomsky continued to revise his theories, leading many psychologists to grow frustrated with linguistic theory. As an enduring legacy, the field of psycholinguistics remains fragmented to this day (McGroarty; Kess).
Prior to the development of psycholinguistics, language acquisition was largely explained as a process of imitation involving production, comprehension, and gradual learning. Chomsky's theory of language stands in sharp contrast to the behaviorist position of B.F. Skinner. Skinner argued that the genetic component of language development is expressed in the child's general capacity to learn, and that language itself is acquired through imitation and positive reinforcement. Chomsky, by contrast, argued the "nativist" position: that there is a universal deep structure or grammar underlying all human languages, and that children are therefore born with innate knowledge of linguistic rules and syntax (McConnell).
In Skinner's imitative approach, the child was thought to mimic the language of those around them, and through this process of imitation somehow derive the rules of language.
The imitative approach does explain reasonably well the selective reinforcement parents use to shape their children's word usage and sounds during the babbling stage. However, the theory fails to explain why all children universally pass through a babbling stage (McConnell). Another flaw in the imitative approach is that children are regularly exposed to ungrammatical sentences in everyday speech and yet manage to induce correct grammatical rules on their own. Furthermore, children learn the rules of language very early, despite never having these rules explicitly explained to them. Young children also frequently encounter grammatical speech and yet generate rules that are incorrect but strikingly consistent. For example, children commonly hear that the plural of moose is moose and the plural of goose is geese, yet consistently — at least at a limited stage of development — produce mooses and gooses as plural forms (Taylor).
In contrast to the imitative approach, psycholinguistics has made remarkable progress in understanding child language acquisition. Regardless of the language involved, children worldwide show striking similarity in how they acquire language. Language development appears to be "hard-wired," or preprogrammed, within the brain, emerging at a predictable point in a child's development across cultures and language systems, provided the child is neurologically unimpaired (Weaver).
Fascinatingly, child language has its own grammatical and syntactical rules. It is not simply an inferior version of adult language but a system with its own structure. Moreover, the rules of child language are strikingly similar regardless of the child's mother tongue. These findings lend considerable support to Chomsky's assertion that language acquisition has a genetic component. Researchers continue to investigate how children move from child language forms to adult grammatical structures — for example, how a child transitions from "What kitty can eat?" to the adult form "What can kitty eat?" (Xrefer).
There are, of course, various theories of language acquisition, of which Chomsky's is only the most prominent. Chomsky argued that children possess an innate language acquisition device — essentially a set of principles governing language structure, along with a mechanism for discovering additional principles. Jean Piaget, by contrast, emphasized the importance of relating language acquisition to underlying intellectual and cognitive development. Other researchers held that language acquisition is rooted primarily in the child's analysis of adult speech. Many divergent theories appear to hold some validity, and it is important to acknowledge Chomsky's major contribution while recognizing that other frameworks also offer important insights into language learning (Taylor; Kess).
"Victor and Genie illustrate critical period consequences"
"Applying psycholinguistics to reading and writing teaching"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.