This paper examines two interconnected economic concepts: price rationing and risk aversion. It explains how price ceilings artificially constrain market prices below equilibrium, creating shortages that require rationing mechanisms such as coupons to ensure fair resource allocation. The paper then shifts to risk aversion, analyzing how individuals and organizations assess uncertain outcomes based on their utility functions and available resources. By comparing individual and organizational risk tolerance, the paper demonstrates that risk tolerance is fundamentally determined by the shape of one's utility curve and the resources available to absorb uncertainty.
A price ceiling artificially sets the price of a good below the market equilibrium price. With a price ceiling in effect, the actual price is lower, supply is lower, and quantity demanded is higher than quantity supplied. While price ceilings are effective in keeping the price of a product low, this imbalance results in excess quantity demanded—a shortage. This disequilibrium is an unavoidable consequence of constraining prices below their market-clearing level.
When rationing is implemented, it functions as a form of command economy. Coupons are a way to manage demand and to ensure that the maximum number of people who demand the good at such low supply actually receive it. In short, effective use of rationing coupons helps achieve efficient allocation of scarce resources. Without couponing, those whose demand allows them to purchase more at the artificial price would consume more of the good, leaving less for others.
Some economists contend that coupons are ineffective since the supply is not driven by market forces. The value of coupons is inevitably determined by those who want to trade them, not necessarily by those who want to use them. Nevertheless, coupons serve an important purpose: they allow the government to artificially manage the shortage created by the price ceiling. By distributing coupons, the government gives more people the opportunity to consume the good. At the artificially low price, the good would otherwise be consumed before others had the chance to purchase it, exacerbating inequality of access.
Risk aversion refers to the level of uncertain payout an individual or organization is willing to undertake. When examining risk tolerance, it is essential to understand that the risk borne by an organization or individual is directly related to the anticipated payoff and the resources available. We must also keep in mind that it is not organizations alone that make decisions to expose themselves to risk; rather, it is the sum of individual decisions that determine what actions an organization will undertake.
In economics, the shape of the utility function helps us determine the tolerance for risk. The general assumption is that most people are risk averse. Since organizations are made up of people, organizations also tend to be risk averse. A utility curve graphically represents how an individual or organization values different levels of wealth or payoff. The shape of this curve reveals the degree of risk aversion present.
The level of risk tolerance one has is related to the amount of uncertain gain he or she is willing to absorb. Organizations may have a higher tolerance for risk simply because they have more resources available to them to eliminate or mitigate the uncertainties of a risk they are considering undertaking. An individual may not have the same resources available, and therefore individuals are—all else held constant—more risk averse than organizations.
For substantial risks, both organizations and individuals exhibit risk aversion, meaning that they value uncertainties at less than their expected values. The "certain equivalent" is defined as the amount of money for which a decision maker would be indifferent between receiving that amount for certain and receiving the uncertain outcomes of a gamble. This concept illustrates how risk-averse actors systematically discount uncertain prospects relative to guaranteed alternatives.
In sum, risk tolerance is a function of the utility curve. Organizations tend to be more risk tolerant because the sum of their experiences and resources allow them to make many of the uncertainties about taking a risk more certain. The interplay between price rationing and risk aversion demonstrates a deeper principle in economics: scarcity and uncertainty shape how both markets and individual decision-makers allocate resources and manage exposure.
You’re 96% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.