This paper examines the relationship between managerial control and motivation within a police department, using a case study of Captain Frebe as a central example. It argues that overly authoritarian leadership breeds resentment rather than discipline, and that officers — accustomed to independent judgment in the field — require participatory management practices to remain motivated. The paper discusses how open communication, officer involvement in decision-making, and flexible oversight can replace rigid top-down control. It also highlights how poorly implemented policies, such as those increasing paperwork burdens, further erode morale. The paper concludes that individualized, democratic leadership strategies are essential to sustaining motivation within a police force.
A relationship exists between control and motivation in a police force. Generally, police officers are accustomed to working in a fairly individual and self-structured environment, so when new authority structures are established, they are often a source of conflict. In any workplace, the tendency of personnel is to become less motivated the more control they perceive is being forced upon them. A more authoritarian environment — such as that created by Captain Frebe — often breeds resentment rather than discipline and a loyal workforce. It is important, however, that a chief working in such an environment maintain some level of control over employees in order to preserve order.
How does a unit create balance? Anderson (1999) suggests that managers of a police department should distinguish themselves by maintaining an equal level of concern for the needs of officers and the needs of the department. Furthermore, managers must be aware that there are many critics willing to point out everything that is going wrong rather than acknowledging what is going right within a given force.
In general, within a police agency, officers are accustomed to dispersing through a precinct either alone or in pairs and exercising individual judgment over matters with "little direct oversight" with regard to responses and calls (Anderson, 1999). The perception that someone is constantly looking over their shoulder may cause fear and even a sense of lost autonomy.
Captain Frebe could have instituted many mechanisms for control without alienating officers. The primary method available to him was open communication and meaningful participation from the officers themselves. At no point in the case study was there any indication that Captain Frebe took into consideration the ideas and suggestions of members of the force. Officers can do a great deal to create a motivating work environment, but to motivate one another and take pride in their work, they must feel they have a voice and are part of the organization as a whole.
Officers need to participate in decision-making and help develop strategies for success — strategies that account for the motivation and advancement of each member of the force. Captain Frebe should have expressed his concerns about the problems he was facing, including the lack of motivation among team members, and attempted to solve those problems in a manner that encouraged equal participation and an open forum. In that way, no member of the force would have felt alienated, and all would have been working toward the common good of the team.
Captain Frebe also failed to recognize that the new rules and regulations he implemented had actually increased the paperwork burden on his employees — a further deterrent to motivation and a positive work environment. Had he consulted with officers prior to implementing his strategy, or at a minimum gathered feedback during the implementation process, he might have foreseen this problem and found ways to reduce the workload and improve employee morale.
"Flexible, individualized management strategies sustain police motivation"
When it comes to motivation, a one-size-fits-all approach never works, whether in a police organization or in any other type of organization. Therefore, it is in the best interests of all parties involved to discuss the various tools that can be used to motivate the team and to encourage the participation of each member of the force. Captain Frebe, as illustrated in the case study, took an authoritarian approach to management. He would benefit far more from a democratic leadership approach, which would allow greater input from employees and officers, foster a sense of ownership over outcomes, and ultimately produce a more motivated and effective police force.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.