This paper examines Wong and Gerras's study "Lying to Ourselves: Dishonesty in the Army Profession," which identifies widespread moral and ethical failures across the U.S. military. The paper reviews how military leaders rationalize dishonesty, how institutional cultures enable the unspoken acceptance of lying, and how officers cope with impossible compliance demands by misrepresenting their accomplishments and training standards. Using the Air Force nuclear missile launch officer cheating scandal as a case study, the paper outlines a multi-step response strategy. It concludes by drawing lessons for platoon-level leadership, emphasizing the need to lead truthfully and build an organizational culture grounded in genuine integrity.
Military integrity has been a major issue in recent years due to the increase in moral and ethical problems evident across the entire United States military, not just the Army alone. Wong and Gerras's article focuses on highlighting these moral and ethical problems that are increasingly affecting integrity in the U.S. military. As the article makes clear, leaders in the American military lie when performing their duties and constantly use rationalizations and justifications to address any emerging ethical or moral doubt. This tendency has in turn contributed to the unspoken embrace of dishonesty by these leaders, which is a clear reflection of hypocrisy.
One of the major conclusions from this article is that lying has become increasingly acceptable in the U.S. military and is facilitated by its leaders. Dishonesty and hypocrisy in the military are widely accepted by leaders who not only lie while conducting their duties but also use justifications for such actions. Leaders carry out these actions because they have become ethically numb through behaviors such as cheating on tests and sharing classified information in exchange for bribes.1
Army officers find it difficult or impossible to achieve all obligatory requirements, despite the unacceptability of failing to meet those requirements. As a result, these officers cope with this challenge by lying about their accomplishments, training practices, and standards of training. Military institutions have also played a major role in this problem by encouraging subordinates to prioritize which requirements will be met based on existing standards and which will not. Despite increased dishonesty, officers and members of the profession continue to maintain an image of integrity, since many decisions in this field are no longer regarded as moral choices. In addition to other proposed measures, the most important way of addressing this problem is leading truthfully through making necessary changes to the culture of dishonesty.
"Nuclear officer exam cheating and proposed response steps"
"Platoon leader lessons on leading truthfully"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.