This paper examines the psychological concepts of introversion and extraversion as theorized by Eysenck and Cattell, exploring how each personality type relates to nervous system arousal, environmental preferences, emotional stability, and brain chemistry. Drawing on studies by Campbell and Hawley (1982), Canli et al. (2001), and Libkuman et al. (1998), the paper demonstrates that introverts and extraverts differ not only in social behavior but also in the stimuli they respond to, the environments they seek, and the neurological processes underlying their emotional reactions. The paper concludes that these differences are profound, biologically rooted, and consistently observable across multiple dimensions of human behavior.
Eysenck and Cattell's ideas regarding the concepts of introversion and extraversion were quite similar. Both based their concepts on the degree to which a person directs their energy either outward toward the external environment — including other people — or inward toward their inner self and their own personal experiences (Hockenberry & Hockenberry, 2004, p. 417). These personality types can be seen developing even in early childhood. "Children who are very shy and/or fearful are more likely to become introverted adults, whereas fearless children are more likely to become extroverted" (as cited in Woodward et al., 2001, p. 535).
Some of the traits of those who show a high level of introversion include being quiet, private, reserved, and reluctant to seek new experiences. In contrast, a person who shows high levels of extraversion tends to be sociable and outgoing, typically enjoying new experiences as well as stimulating environments.
Eysenck theorized that the differences in individual personalities occur due to biological differences among individuals. He surmised that an introvert's nervous system differed from that of an extravert's, specifically that an introvert's nervous system was more easily aroused. He expanded this theory to include an individual's tendency to seek out optimal levels of arousal (Hockenberry & Hockenberry, 2004, p. 418).
According to Eysenck's biological model of personality, these differences in arousal thresholds are not purely psychological but are rooted in the functioning of the central nervous system, making introversion and extraversion relatively stable traits across a person's lifetime.
In this pursuit of optimal levels of arousal, extraverts naturally seek more stimulation from their environments than their introverted peers, as their nervous systems are less easily aroused. For this reason, introverts are less comfortable in highly stimulating environments and tend to seek out areas of lower stimulation (Hockenberry & Hockenberry, 2004, p. 418).
In 1982, researchers Campbell and Hawley conducted a study confirming Eysenck's theory regarding the tendency of introverts and extraverts to prefer different environments. Their study of college students revealed that extraverted students preferred open, noisy areas of a college library, where they had opportunities to socialize with others. In contrast, introverted students chose secluded areas of the library, often hidden by tall bookcases, so that they could work in solitude (Hockenberry & Hockenberry, 2004, p. 418). These findings supported Eysenck's theory that those who scored higher on the extraversion scale would be more attracted to higher-stimulation environments than those who scored higher on the introversion scale.
"Emotional stability further shapes introvert and extravert traits"
"Brain reactivity and memory differ by personality type"
The difference between introverts and extraverts is quite profound. Most people are aware that extraverts are the more outgoing of the two, but the differences in the situations and environments each type seeks out are equally significant. Campbell and Hawley's study was particularly telling: in a natural setting for the college students observed, it provided strong support for the existing theory, showing that these students naturally migrated to environments that allowed them to reach optimal levels of stimulation.
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.