This paper examines the relationship between government control and human emotion across three texts: Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, a work on Animal Spirits, and George Orwell's 1984. The author argues that government structures, though seemingly destructive, teach economic and social values that shape human behavior and emotional responses. The paper compares how each text portrays the suppression of personal freedom through economic conditioning, technological control, and propaganda. The analysis demonstrates that human emotions are directly affected by governmental systems, and that true personal freedom is compromised when governments dictate social structures, family dynamics, and individual thought.
The relationship between government systems and human emotional response is fundamental to understanding how societies function. When people expect an economic downfall, that expectation often becomes self-fulfilling; similarly, when governments impose strict controls on behavior, human emotions and responses adapt accordingly. Government institutions, while often concrete and seemingly inevitable, can be destructive in ways that hinder human nature itself. This raises an important question: can human emotions and authentic relationships survive under totalitarian systems, or are they inevitably corrupted by governmental power?
This paper examines three texts that explore this central tension between government control and human freedom: Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, Animal Spirits, and George Orwell's 1984. While these works differ in their approach, they share a common insight: that human emotions are fundamentally affected by the systems in which people live. Even in supposedly gentler dystopias like Brave New World, where the government teaches social responsibility through family structures and economic conditioning, people are still stripped of authentic choice. The difference is primarily one of method, not outcome. Whether through subtle conditioning or overt coercion, government systems ultimately dictate how humans feel, think, and relate to one another.
In Brave New World, Huxley presents a society where people are not killed for minor infractions but rather trained to internalize the government's economic and social values. The regime teaches conformity through family structures, parental responsibility, and conditioning from early childhood. Parents are expected to care for, love, and nurture their children according to state-approved standards. Even those with limited skills are compelled to participate in this system of socialization, ensuring that children learn to read, think, and value what the government deems acceptable.
This system of conditioning is so effective that individuals like Bernard, who resist proper conditioning, are labeled defective but ultimately harmless. As the text states: "You can't teach a rhinoceros tricks. Some men are almost rhinoceroses; they don't respond properly to conditioning. Poor Devils! Bernard's one of them. However, I think he's pretty harmless." The metaphor reveals a chilling truth: those who cannot be conditioned are merely tolerated as anomalies, not accepted as individuals. The government has transformed human development into a predictable, controllable process.
Americans in modern society similarly seek material prosperity and economic security, yet this desire itself may be a form of conditioning. The pursuit of abundance and consumer goods becomes a replacement for authentic freedom and choice. Consumerism and economic aspiration function as subtle forms of control, shaping what people desire and therefore how they behave. In both Brave New World and contemporary American life, economic values are deliberately taught to structure society according to governmental and corporate interests.
Beyond fiction, real-world economic systems reveal how government and corporate power shape human behavior and emotion. Economic changes have threatened the American middle class as corporations transfer production and service jobs to low-wage workers domestically and internationally. This structural shift demonstrates that economic systems are not natural or inevitable; they are designed and controlled.
Technological innovation and globalization have eliminated manufacturing and service sector jobs at an accelerating pace. These changes threaten the middle class and other social classes in multiple ways. Productivity growth, while theoretically beneficial, creates instability when the gains are not fairly distributed. The poor structure of globalization has increased economic inequality, demonstrating that free market capitalism does not naturally produce stability or prosperity for all.
Traditional economic theory teaches that free market capitalism will naturally achieve equilibrium and stability. However, political figures have repeatedly provided institutional frameworks that favor certain classes while undermining others. Although globalization has created some growth and flourishing in certain sectors, it remains a major concern for economic stability and social cohesion. Modern political leaders seek to manage economic growth, yet the solution lies not in complex interventions but in understanding fundamental human needs and values—security, dignity, community, and authentic choice.
George Orwell's 1984 presents an even more extreme version of governmental control. In this dystopia, the government controls not only economics and social structure but also the most intimate aspects of human life, including family relationships and private thought. Laws dictate how families must conduct themselves, and violation of these laws results in execution or torture.
The regime in 1984 uses constant surveillance, propaganda, and the threat of violence to eliminate personal freedom entirely. Citizens are forced to participate in public demonstrations—banners, processions, slogans, games, and community hikes—all designed to reinforce state ideology and prevent individual thought. Even supposed loyalty to the party is meaningless; a party member might denounce loved ones as thought criminals to demonstrate allegiance. The protagonist's realization that a fellow party member would murder him without hesitation reveals the complete destruction of human trust and genuine emotion under totalitarianism.
1984 demonstrates that when government achieves total control, human emotion becomes a liability that must be suppressed. Love, loyalty, and compassion are dangerous because they create bonds that might compete with loyalty to the state. Therefore, totalitarian regimes must systematically destroy authentic emotional life.
"Government propaganda and control eliminate authentic personal freedom and emotion"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.