This paper applies family systems theory to a clinical vignette involving Claudia and Margaret, a same-sex couple with histories of childhood abuse, domestic violence, and substance use. The paper analyzes how early trauma shapes insecure attachment styles, perpetuates intimate partner violence, and contributes to alcohol dependence. It then proposes a two-pronged treatment plan: Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) to build on client strengths and co-construct preferred futures, and Alternatives for Families: a Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (AF-CBT) to address the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral needs of both caregivers and children across structured treatment phases.
Claudia and Margaret both suffered violence at a young age and are therefore prone to committing acts of aggression, with a greater likelihood of developing symptoms such as anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem compared to those who experienced a violence-free childhood. Being victims of, and exposed to, family violence during childhood can cause both Claudia and Margaret to become either victims or offenders. Margaret was a victim of violence in her youth and resorted to aggression as a means of resolving conflicts in her relationships; her personality structure incorporates shame, anger, and guilt. Claudia, also victimized in childhood, struggles to regulate her emotions — particularly anger — and exhibits a higher tolerance for adult intimate abuse. Having been victimized or exposed to abuse, they not only display aggressive behaviors but also possess ineffective coping strategies and weak communication skills (Beatty, 2013).
In conducting therapy with couples and families, it is well established that past unresolved wounds become prominent factors affecting intimate relationships in adulthood. Such deeply entrenched wounds result in ineffective communication, high distress levels, heightened frustration, and greater risks of domestic violence (Beatty, 2013). Consequently, although Claudia and Margaret sought to escape their past relationship patterns, they appear to have reconstructed attachment styles and relationship dynamics that continue to perpetuate violence. Margaret suffered at the hands of abusive, controlling parents, which instilled in her a desire to dominate others and a preference for environments that — misleadingly — make her feel secure. She finds it difficult to empathize with others, with Claudia being the primary target of her callousness. She therefore frequently resorts to partner violence. The kind of attachment a child forms with his or her primary caretaker partly determines the degree of resilience or traumatization that child experiences. Attachment is complementary and is the process of interconnecting intimate messages developed over many exchanges and experiences.
The attachment styles observable in this family are of two kinds: insecure and secure. Claudia consistently displays an insecure attachment style, which encompasses dismissing, fearful-avoidant, and preoccupied patterns. A childhood attachment style in Claudia that was insecure-disoriented/disorganized became fearful-avoidant in adulthood; insecure-resistant/ambivalent became insecure-preoccupied, while an insecure-dismissing childhood attachment style remained insecure-dismissing in adulthood.
The attachment style established during childhood for both women remained consistent into adulthood. Although fluidity can be seen in relating to different individuals, attachment styles remain relatively constant over time. Research findings indicate that adults who experienced encouragement, affection, warmth, and empathy in childhood are more likely to form secure attachments to their primary figures and less likely to engage in violence in adult relationships (Beatty, 2013). While Margaret displays adequate social and communication skills that incline her toward more secure adult relationship attachments, Claudia requires repeated attention and reassurance. Being partnered with an individual who possesses a more independent personality makes Claudia all the more vulnerable to intimate abuse.
Lesbian or adult intimate/domestic violence may involve anything from verbal, emotional, and psychological abuse to sexual abuse and coercion. In this instance, intimate violence takes the form of put-downs and intimidation (Beatty, 2013). The domestic violence in this case stems from Margaret's controlling and coercive behavior, which limits, directs, and shapes her partner's feelings, thoughts, and actions. For a broader overview of how attachment theory explains the development of these relationship patterns, see the foundational work of Bowlby and Ainsworth.
Margaret also suffers from alcoholism, and the possible reasons she turns to alcohol dependence and abuse include depression and stress, social isolation, self-medication, and exposure to physical and verbal abuse. Stress arises from internal or external events that an individual finds difficult to endure and can lead to physical or psychological problems. As a lesbian, Margaret experiences increased stress as a result of society's negative attitudes toward her sexual orientation. This stress is linked to alcohol consumption and drug abuse among lesbians. Homosexual women are highly prone to stress and likely to have negative experiences related to their sexual identity. Thus, Margaret turns to substance abuse for self-medication and to suppress depression and stress. She uses alcohol to manage feelings about her homosexual orientation and to avoid the embarrassment she may experience regarding her sexuality.
Alcoholism also provides an opportunity to gain social acceptance; being intoxicated can serve as a seemingly satisfactory explanation for homosexual behavior in contexts where such behavior is stigmatized. Social isolation is greatly experienced by many homosexual women and contributes to escalating alcohol abuse in cases like Margaret's. The effort to conceal one's sexual identity results in increased isolation and loneliness; mainstream society's rejection of homosexuals intensifies these feelings. Through alcohol consumption, Margaret finds opportunities to interact with others and experience human contact, which positively reinforces and increases the frequency of substance use (Substance abuse and dependence within the gay/lesbian community, 2008).
In addition to social isolation, Margaret lives in fear of verbal and physical abuse owing to her sexual orientation. Lesbians must cope with isolation, rejection, violence, and harassment, all of which increase the risk of developing problematic behaviors — as seen in the abusive manner in which Margaret treats Claudia. Each of these stressors faced by homosexual women creates a history that shapes their interpretation of the world (Substance abuse and dependence within the gay/lesbian community, 2008). The minority stress model is a well-established framework for understanding these elevated risks among LGBTQ+ populations.
Child abuse encompasses physical, psychological/emotional, and sexual aggression, in addition to exposure to domestic abuse. These can involve both verbal and non-verbal behavior directed toward juveniles under 17 years of age. Psychological or emotional abuse that causes harm to a child includes threats, hurtful words, isolation, intimidation, control, and jealousy. Unsupportive behavior, failure to encourage a child's goals and dreams, and disrespect of a child's feelings all constitute psychological or emotional abuse.
Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) differs from traditional therapy in that traditional treatment places greater emphasis on the exploration of problematic feelings, behaviors, cognitions, and interactions, as well as confrontation, interpretation, and client education. The competency-based SFBT model, by contrast, gives less importance to past problems and failures and focuses instead on the previous successes and strengths of clients. Emphasis is placed on working from the client's own interpretation of their situation and the change they wish to achieve (Trepper et al., 2008).
This therapy uses the same process regardless of the concern brought by the client to therapy. The approach emphasizes how individual clients change, rather than focusing on diagnosing and treating problems. It adopts the language of change, with the trademark questions posed in SFBT interviews designed to establish a therapeutic process in which therapists listen carefully to clients' words and meanings — what is significant to them, what they want, and what successes they have experienced. Therapists then formulate the next question by connecting it to the client's key phrases and words. This ongoing process of listening, absorbing, and then connecting to the client's responses allows the therapist and client to co-construct new, altered meanings and build toward a solution (Trepper et al., 2008).
SFBT is primarily composed of conversations. There are three major general elements in SFBT conversations. First, the overall concerns: SFBT conversations focus on who the clients are and what matters to them, visualization of a desired future, clients' strengths, resources and exceptions related to that vision, enhancing clients' motivation and confidence in obtaining solutions, and continuous scaling of client progress toward the desired future. Second, as noted above, solution-focused conversations involve a therapeutic process of co-constructing new or altered meanings with the client. This process begins with therapists asking solution-focused questions about the conversation topics described above, and then building from the meanings expressed by the clients. Third, therapists employ specific questioning and responding techniques that encourage clients to co-construct a preferred future vision and to use their past successes, resources, and strengths to turn that vision into reality (Trepper et al., 2008).
"Defining emotional and psychological abuse toward children"
In SFBT, the therapist acts as a consultant and collaborator, assisting clients in achieving their goals. Clients take a more active role in the conversation, and what clients choose to discuss forms the basis for resolving their concerns. SFBT therapists tend to use more indirect techniques, such as asking extensive questions about previous solutions and exceptions. Within this model, the client becomes the expert, while the therapist — through solution-focused questioning and responding — adopts the stance of "not-knowing" and "guiding from a step behind" (Trepper et al., 2008).
Taking a solution-focused, collegial, positive stance: One of the key aspects of solution-focused therapy is the broad stance adopted by the practitioner. The general attitude is respectful, hopeful, and positive (Trepper et al., 2008).
Seeking previous solutions: Solution-focused therapists recognize that most people have successfully resolved problems in the past, whether at a different time, place, or situation (Trepper et al., 2008).
Seeking exceptions: When clients cannot identify previous solutions that can be repeated, most will be able to recall a recent example of an exception to their problem — a time when the problem could have occurred but did not.
Questions rather than interpretations or directives: Questions are the primary intervention and communication tool used by SFBT therapists. Therapists take care not to offer interpretations and seldom directly confront or challenge a client.
Present- and future-centered questions: Questions posed by therapists almost always focus on the present or future, with emphasis placed nearly entirely on what clients want to happen in their lives or on what is already occurring in line with their wishes.
Compliments: Compliments are another important component of SFBT. They involve validating what clients are doing well, acknowledging the difficulty of their problems, and conveying that the therapist listens, understands, and cares — all of which encourage clients to continue working toward change.
Gentle nudging toward what works: After cultivating a positive mindset through compliments and identifying previous solutions or exceptions, SFBT therapists gently encourage clients to work further toward their goals or to try changes they have identified and feel ready to attempt — often described as "an experiment" (Trepper et al., 2008).
Pre-session changes: At or near the start of the first therapy session, SFBT therapists typically ask about any changes the client has noticed since calling to schedule the appointment (Trepper et al., 2008).
Solution-focused goal: As in many psychotherapy models, a fundamental component of solution-focused therapy is the establishment of specific, concrete, and clear goals (Trepper et al., 2008).
Miracle Question: Some clients find it difficult to articulate any goal, let alone a solution-focused one. The Miracle Question offers a way to invite the client to describe goals in a manner that respects and acknowledges the severity of their problem, while simultaneously leading the client to identify smaller and more manageable goals (Trepper et al., 2008). For more on the theoretical foundations and techniques of SFBT, a broad overview is available through academic and reference sources.
"Three-phase AF-CBT model for caregivers and children"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.