This paper examines the Developmental Audit (DA), an alternative assessment approach that moves beyond standardized testing and psychiatric diagnosis to understand young people within their ecological contexts of family, school, peer groups, and community. The paper explores the DA's applications in therapeutic settings, courts, and juvenile outreach programs, discusses how it serves as both an information-gathering and growth-planning tool, and addresses its role in identifying root causes of behavioral and emotional challenges. The analysis also considers the DA's limitations, particularly its presentation bias toward the method, before concluding that developmental approaches focused on individual circumstances show greater promise for justice system effectiveness than crime-focused interventions alone.
The Developmental Audit (DA) provides an alternative assessment beyond traditional standardized tests and psychiatric diagnosis. It explores a young person's motivations, beliefs, and behaviors within the ecological context of family, school, peer group, and community (Bronfenbrenner, 1986). This paper examines the intricacies, advantages, and disadvantages of the DA and how to effectively employ it when working with vulnerable youth.
Understanding young people requires gathering perceptions and experiences from multiple sources and perspectives. The DA is used across a number of settings. According to Brendtro et al. (2012), these settings include schools, treatment centers, juvenile outreach programs, and courts. Brendtro emphasizes that the DA functions not merely as an information-gathering tool but also as a means to develop growth plans for what he calls "resilient life outcomes" (p. 7). Freado and Bath (2014) state that the Developmental Audit is designed to acknowledge a critical reality: the young people participating in the DA often face very serious challenges. Many of these youth experience serious emotional and conduct disorders and struggle with issues such as depression and anxiety.
The application of the DA is relevant across multiple professional arenas, but it can be especially useful in therapeutic environments—particularly when working with families and youthful offenders who may lack adequate resources to address violent or misbehaving youth. By using the DA to discover the underlying root causes for behavior, the therapist or technician gains insight into how to approach the individual within a developmental framework.
As Freado et al. (2014) note, the DA is designed not only to acknowledge the challenges these young people face but also to serve a practical function in mental health and social service settings. It operates "as a format for treatment planning and case evaluation" (p. 21). This dual role—both diagnostic and prescriptive—makes it a valuable tool for professionals seeking to move beyond surface-level behavioral responses toward meaningful intervention.
The primary strength of the DA lies in its capacity to gather comprehensive information about and from vulnerable youth in order to understand, in a more holistic manner, why these young people act out as they do. The DA is helpful in developing an understanding of the complex causal pathways that lead to behavioral and emotional crises. It accomplishes this through a multi-faceted, developmentally-focused approach grounded in research on risk and resilience.
Brendtro et al. (2012) support this assertion by demonstrating that the DA is rooted in extensive research on risk and resilience factors. The DA allows practitioners to determine the youth's developmental pathway—how the individual reached the current crisis point, what circumstances or influences led them to take actions most adults would avoid, and what overwhelming factors shaped their choices. Most importantly, the DA provides an individualized restorative plan tailored to the specific youth, addressing essential questions such as why this crisis occurred and what conditions need to change for positive development to resume.
As noted above, the DA is a beneficial tool across different settings, especially in courts and treatment arenas. Implementing the DA in a therapeutic context allows the clinician to address root causes in a highly individualized manner. This is valuable precisely because no two children are alike, and no two circumstances are exactly the same. Often, the best outcomes emerge when the intervention provides the therapist flexibility to employ a variety of treatment methods tailored to the core issues at hand, rather than applying a standardized protocol to all cases.
A significant limitation of the literature on the DA is that it presents a largely biased view. The authors who discuss the DA are typically proponents of the method and demonstrate consistent use of it throughout their work. However, these authors do not present any substantively critical views of the DA. It would be valuable to determine whether there are documented disadvantages when the DA is compared to other assessment interventions or data-gathering methods.
While the DA may indeed be the most effective tool available based on its widespread usage and acceptance, this does not preclude the possibility of negative aspects or contexts in which alternative approaches might be preferable. A more balanced literature base would include counterarguments and comparative effectiveness research to strengthen the empirical foundation for recommending the DA over other assessment frameworks.
The research examined in this paper finds that "justice approaches focusing on the nature of the crime but ignoring childhood and adolescent experiences shows little promise of effectiveness" (p. 25). This observation underscores the importance of developmental understanding in responding to youth who have engaged in harmful or illegal behavior.
By using the DA, courts and justice system professionals are far more likely to enable progression toward a more stable life and environment if the core issues faced by the youth can be effectively addressed. The literature contends that the DA is an effective manner by which those core issues can be discovered and that it can then enable other treatments and interventions to achieve their maximum potential effects. The evidence suggests that when a child receives support grounded in developmental understanding, that child develops expanding skills in learning, planning, self-control, and attention. The DA, according to its proponents, assists in this healthy development in a comprehensive manner, offering promise for more humane and effective responses to vulnerable youth across multiple systems.
You’re 98% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.