This paper critically evaluates an NPR All Things Considered segment titled "Summer Science: Studying Mosquitoes and Corn," focusing on the accuracy of the corn biology content presented to a general audience. The analysis identifies key errors made by the farmer and interviewer, most notably the conflation of the silk (female stigma) with the tassel (male inflorescence). The paper clarifies the correct anatomical and functional distinctions between these structures, explains the role of wind pollination and timing in corn reproduction, and acknowledges what the farmer got right about the relationship between wind and fertilization. The analysis draws on plant physiology sources to contextualize these inaccuracies.
The NPR Health and Science special on All Things Considered entitled "Summer Science: Studying Mosquitoes and Corn" is addressed to a general audience. Scientific jargon is understandably avoided in the segment on corn because most listeners only want and need to learn about the general concepts behind corn biology, physiology, and reproduction. However, in the process of oversimplifying corn physiology and reproduction, the farmer speaking to NPR made a few key errors.
Using the term "ears" for the female corn inflorescences is understandable, and using the common term "silks" for what are essentially elongated stigmas on the female inflorescences makes sense when the radio audience consists of listeners without a background in plant physiology. Unfortunately, both the farmer and the interviewer confuse the silk with the tassel. In fact, the silk is the pollen receptor — or stigma — on the female plant, whereas the tassel is the male inflorescence, or cluster of flowers. The two terms are not interchangeable.
The tassel (male inflorescence) contains pollen grains that fertilize the silks (stigmas), which are located on the ear shoot. Silk and tassel look similar, but the two structures are functionally different. The NPR interviewer uses them synonymously, without correction from the farmer. This conflation is the segment's most significant factual error, as it inverts the reproductive roles of the two structures for any listener attempting to understand how corn reproduces.
Despite the confusion over terminology, the farmer is correct in emphasizing the importance of the silk and tassel — the stigma and the male inflorescence — in the reproduction of corn. Moreover, the farmer appropriately stresses the relationship between wind and corn fertilization. According to plant physiologist P. Thomison, pollen grains are "borne in anthers, each of which contains a large number of pollen grains" that emerge only during certain morning hours (Thomison). The farmer in the NPR segment, however, fails to mention this crucial timing involved in corn pollination, which is a meaningful omission for listeners interested in the agricultural implications of the process.
"Anatomy of corn ovules, kernels, and pollen"
Despite the accessibility goals of general-audience science broadcasting, factual accuracy remains essential. The NPR segment's conflation of silk and tassel represents a meaningful error that could leave listeners with a mistaken understanding of corn reproduction. While simplifying terminology for a lay audience is appropriate, carefulness with functional distinctions — such as which structure is male and which is female — should not be sacrificed in the process. A brief, accurate correction from the farmer would have preserved both accessibility and scientific integrity.
You’re 78% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.