This paper examines two organizations — Costco and the U.S. Navy — through the lens of the ethics continuum, evaluating the degree to which each is "engaged" in ethical behavior. The paper argues that Costco exemplifies active ethical engagement through above-average employee compensation, low turnover, accessible customer service, and a CEO compensation philosophy that reflects institutional values. It further contends that the U.S. Navy occupies a similarly engaged position, though certain operational demands — such as secrecy and national security requirements — occasionally limit full ethical transparency toward all stakeholders.
The ethics continuum is a framework for evaluating the degree to which an organization actively embraces ethical behavior as part of its identity and operations. At one end sits indifference or active wrongdoing; at the other sits full engagement, where ethical conduct is seen as integral to — and beneficial for — the organization's mission. The two organizations examined here, Costco and the U.S. Navy, both fall toward the engaged end of this continuum, though for different reasons and with different limitations.
Costco falls firmly under the "engaged" section of the ethics continuum. This means the company believes that taking an ethical position is beneficial to its operations and is active in taking such stands. Costco has long been known for its strong commitment to its employees. Their code of ethics begins with the law and then moves on to people. Workers at Costco receive wages and benefits that are above the industry average, which has resulted in the company having the lowest employee turnover rate in the retail industry.
With respect to customer service, even the CEO answers his own phone. This means customers do not get lost in an automated call system; instead, their problems are addressed directly. The CEO's salary of $350,000 is also significantly lower than those of CEOs at comparable companies, reflecting an institutional philosophy that prioritizes shared value over executive compensation.
Costco's ethical stance is directly tied to its business model. The company cultivates strong loyalty, such that employees become ambassadors for the brand. Strong service keeps customers returning. As a result, Costco spends nothing on advertising or promotions. This savings contributes to the company's ability to sell at the lowest possible price — a key component of its overall business model. Ethics, in this case, is not separate from strategy; it is the strategy.
The U.S. Navy falls more toward the engaged end of the continuum, though it is not as actively engaged as Costco. The Navy's ethics are rooted in its core values. In many respects, honesty and integrity are crucial to the Navy's success, particularly in internal interactions among personnel.
"Navy's ethics balanced against operational security demands"
Both Costco and the U.S. Navy demonstrate meaningful ethical engagement, each shaped by the demands of their respective operating environments. Costco's ethics are woven directly into its business model, producing measurable outcomes in employee retention, customer loyalty, and pricing. The Navy's ethics are grounded in institutional core values and govern the majority of its conduct, though national security imperatives create specific areas where full ethical transparency is not possible. Taken together, both cases illustrate that ethical engagement exists on a spectrum, and that context plays an essential role in determining how ethics is expressed within any organization.
You’re 74% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.