Book Review Undergraduate 2,458 words

Broken Spears: Aztec Account of the Spanish Conquest

~13 min read
Abstract

This paper reviews and analyzes Broken Spears: The Aztec Account of the Conquest of America, edited by Miguel León-Portilla. The paper provides historical background on Hernando Cortés's defeat of the Aztecs and examines the book's significance as the first major account of the conquest told from the indigenous perspective. It analyzes how Cortés achieved victory through cultural assimilation, strategic use of translators, and exploitation of internal divisions among Indian tribes. The paper also debates the contested legacy of Doña Marina (La Malinche) as either traitor or symbolic mother of the Mexican mestizo nation, ultimately arguing for a balanced reading of both the Aztec and Spanish perspectives.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper does not simply summarize the book but uses it as a lens to argue for a balanced, dual-perspective reading of the conquest — giving the analysis genuine critical purpose.
  • Historical narrative and literary criticism are smoothly integrated: the background section grounds the reader before the essay moves into thematic analysis.
  • The paper incorporates specific concrete examples — Aguilar's role as translator, Doña Marina's biography, the Cempoalan alliance — to support each analytical claim rather than relying on generalization.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates effective use of counterargument and synthesis. Rather than accepting the book's indigenous-victim framing uncritically, the writer acknowledges the book's pro-Aztec bias and then redirects the analysis toward reconciling the Spanish and Aztec accounts. This move — naming a bias, then transcending it — is a hallmark of mature critical writing.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a brief introduction to the book and its significance, followed by a detailed historical chronology of the conquest. The body is organized thematically into two analytical sections: how Cortés used cultural assimilation to gain advantage, and how he exploited inter-tribal rivalries. A focused sub-analysis of Doña Marina's ambiguous legacy bridges these themes. The conclusion calls for synthesizing both perspectives to understand the birth of modern Mexico.

Introduction

Broken Spears: The Aztec Account of the Conquest of America, edited by Miguel León-Portilla (Beacon Press, 1992), tells the Aztec peoples' account of the Spanish conquest of Mexico. Throughout history, the conquest has been told from the viewpoint of the conquistadors — the Spanish victors. Broken Spears was the first book to tell the story of the conquest from the Aztecs' perspective. It was originally published in Spanish in 1959 and first appeared in English in 1962.

The book begins a few years before the conquest by recounting the Aztecs' perceived omens of what was to come, and the remainder gives a chronological account of the conquest itself. The primary impetus of the book is not historical data-gathering but, rather, the storytelling and human emotion behind the Spanish conquest.

Historical Background of the Conquest

Hernando Cortés's army arrived in Mexico in the early sixteenth century and defeated the Mexicans in relatively short order. Cortés had originally been sent to Mexico by the Cuban governor to search for gold, but when he was ordered to withdraw and return to Havana, he gathered eleven ships and six hundred troops and made his way to Mexico instead.

Previous Spanish expeditions had been sent to Mexico as early as 1517, but Cortés was a powerful, persuasive leader who was able to rally his troops. The indigenous peoples also proved very susceptible to the Spaniards' superior weapons, as well as to new European diseases such as smallpox, chickenpox, and measles. Of crucial importance was the Aztec leader Moctezuma's indecisiveness about Cortés's motives and his confusion as to whether Cortés's arrival was a spiritual event or a spiritual sign — a major strategic mistake. Finally, the Mexican Indians were internally divided, and there was widespread resentment of Aztec domination. As a result, the Tlaxcaltecs and other Aztec enemies became the Spaniards' allies.

Cortés arrived in the Yucatán Peninsula in 1519 and marched toward Tenochtitlan. In September of that year, his army battled the Tlaxcaltecs; defeated, the Tlaxcaltecs became Spanish allies. After a massacre at Cholula in October 1519, Cortés and his troops arrived in Tenochtitlan, and the following month Moctezuma was taken prisoner.

In May of 1520, Cortés left Tenochtitlan to confront Pánfilo de Narváez; during his absence, a massacre occurred at the Great Temple of Tenochtitlan, and the Aztecs were able to force the Spaniards back to their quarters. Cortés returned in June, having defeated Narváez, but that same month Moctezuma died. The Spaniards were then forced to flee Tenochtitlan under attack, and in July 1520 the Battle of Otumba took place.

By April 1521, numerous Spanish reinforcements had arrived to support Cortés, and Indian towns began to side with the Spaniards. Finally, in August 1521, Cuauhtémoc was captured and the Aztecs surrendered. The once great Aztec capital, Tenochtitlan, lay in ruins, and its once powerful leader, Moctezuma, was dead.

The Spanish defeat of the Aztecs was of great historical significance. First, the greatest indigenous civilization in Mesoamerican history had been decimated. Second, the Spanish victory gave rise to a new people — born of the mingling of Aztecs and Spaniards — that resulted in today's mestizo Mexican nation.

The importance of Broken Spears is that it finally introduced the conquered peoples' viewpoint of the Spanish conquest. Many commentators and readers have applauded the book precisely for this reason. The subject can become very emotional because of the racial and cultural implications. Some have argued that "conquest" is too mild a term, and that "holocaust" or "mass murder" more accurately describes what occurred when the Spanish Europeans invaded Mexico — given that the Aztecs were the most powerful tribe in Mexico at that time.

They no longer had nor could find any arrows, javelins or stones with which to attack us, and our allies fighting with us were armed with swords and bucklers, and slaughtered so many of them on land and in the water that more than forty thousand were killed or taken that day. So loud was the wailing of the women and children that there was not one man among us whose heart did not bleed at the sound. — Cortés

Domination Engendered through Assimilation

The Aztecs called themselves the Mexica. They were originally nomads who came to the Valley of Mexico in 1276. Although they were initially subjugated under the Toltecs, they were formidable mercenaries and eventually began to build their great city, Tenochtitlan — a gigantic, highly efficient metropolis, remarkable for its system of canals and waterways.

While many commentators portray the Aztecs as indigenous victims of violent European colonialism, it is equally important to recognize that, because of their power and advancement, the Aztecs had become an incredibly dominant ruling tribe among the Indian populations of Mexico — and they were not peaceful rulers. They were known as violent overlords, and they engaged in large-scale human sacrifice of conquered peoples.

Indeed, it could be argued that Broken Spears carries an indigenous, pro-victim bias, as it was published to give voice to the perspective of the conquered. However, a more revealing approach is to examine the Aztec account not simply from the perspective of the author — who is merely the instrument through which the story is told — but rather to scrutinize and critique both perspectives, the Spanish and the Aztec, side by side.

While many critics scathingly accuse Cortés of being yet another colonial conqueror who decimated an indigenous culture with no regard for its native people or traditions, such an account overlooks an important fact: one of the primary reasons Cortés was able to defeat the Aztecs was that he first learned how to become one of them. In short, he learned to assimilate into their culture.

When Cortés first arrived in Mexico, he freed a Spaniard held in captivity by the Indians — Jerónimo de Aguilar. Aguilar had been shipwrecked off Cozumel eight years before Cortés's arrival and had been enslaved by the Indians. As a slave, he learned the Mayan language of his captors. Aguilar became crucial to Cortés's strategy, as Cortés was now able to communicate in the language of the Indians.

After leaving Cozumel, Cortés and his ships sailed up the east coast of Mexico, fighting and defeating thousands of Indians along the way. At Tabasco, he quickly defeated the local Indians, and when they made peace offerings, they presented food, gifts, and women. These Indians, known as the Caciques, did not speak the Mayan language that Aguilar knew. However, among the women presented as gifts was one named Doña Marina, who understood Mayan and could translate Cortés's words. Doña Marina was an Aztec princess who had suffered the misfortune of becoming a slave to the Tabascan Indians; this was how she had come to know not only Nahuatl (the Aztec language) but also the Tabascan and Mayan languages.

Marina and Aguilar proved to be Cortés's ultimate weapons, because through them he was able to communicate with all of the Indian tribes he encountered, including those in the Aztec capital of Tenochtitlan. But beyond this linguistic assimilation, Cortés integrated himself into Indian culture in other crucial ways.

3 Locked Sections · 830 words remaining
48% of this paper shown

Heroine or Traitor: The Role of Doña Marina · 370 words

"Debating La Malinche's legacy and divided loyalties"

Domination through Manipulation of Internal Division · 260 words

"Cortés exploits inter-tribal rivalries to defeat Aztecs"

Uniting the Two Perspectives · 200 words

"Arguing for balanced Spanish and Aztec viewpoints"

Sign Up Now — Instant AccessAlready a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examplesAI writing assistantCitation generatorCancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
Aztec Perspective Spanish Conquest Cultural Assimilation Doña Marina La Malinche Mestizo Nation Tenochtitlan Internal Division Moctezuma Colonial Conquest
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Broken Spears: Aztec Account of the Spanish Conquest. PaperDue. https://paperdue.com/study-guide/broken-spears-aztec-account-spanish-conquest-133721

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.