This paper examines Thomas More's Utopia as both a literary work and a window into More's personal philosophy. It traces More's biography from his legal education and Augustinian influences through his political career under Henry VIII and eventual martyrdom. The paper analyzes the book's fictional framing device — particularly the character Raphael Hythloday — as a strategy for safely voicing radical critiques of European society. It also evaluates Utopia's quasi-communistic social structure, its treatment of religious toleration, and the contradictions between More's idealism and his practical conduct as Lord Chancellor. The paper ultimately argues that More's views were a synthesis of pragmatic tradition and hidden idealism.
Thomas More's Utopia holds a special place in both literature and history. The book is a unique exercise of imagination that culminates in a science-fiction-like vision of the ideal society. It also, however, reveals More's development of a social and religious consciousness that would eventually be responsible for his death and martyrdom. As one scholar notes, "The actual configuration of the Utopia described in the second part of More's volume may seem on the surface to be devoid of reference to institutions historically prevalent in Christendom. Yet the dramatic setting for Hythloday's opportunity to recount what he saw in Utopia is a conversation that takes place just after More has come from mass at Notre Dame, 'the most beautiful and most popular church in Antwerp.'" Additionally, the philosophy and politics evident in his utopia reveal their close relationship to Augustinian values.
In short, the book exposes More's individual perspective regarding European society — one that lays the foundation for communism — alongside his deep reverence for the traditional hierarchies of Christianity, which so many have come to associate with his trial and beheading. The two perspectives appear irreconcilable, but More's idealism and pragmatism come together once one understands his philosophical motivations for each.
Thomas More was born on February 7, 1478, in the historical setting of European expansion and subsequent enlightenment. At the age of six he traveled to London to attend St. Anthony's, a grammar school in which he studied Latin. In 1492 he was nominated by Archbishop John Morton to study at Canterbury College, where he was exposed for the first time to the writings of Aristotle and Plato. The following year More left college to study law at New Inn, London, and he proved quite adept at the subject. "At Lincoln's Inn More's study of law involves the belief that judicial decisions are ultimately grounded in divine authority and as such foundational to human society." This constitutes the foundation for More's premise that law holds an essential position concerning the governance of man: handed down from authority, it supersedes private or personal judgments regarding individuals' actions.
More eventually became associated with the Carthusian Church in 1501, where he lectured on Augustine's City of God. Four years later he decided to enter the public arena and married his first wife, Jane, who died at the age of twenty-two. More married again only one month following her death.
By 1515 More had begun his work on Utopia. It was originally conceived during his travels to Bruges and Antwerp, where he was working to negotiate a number of commercial and diplomatic treaties. The setting for Utopia very much mirrors the historical circumstances, and their social consequences, that More found himself in. The New World had only recently been discovered, and Europeans were coming to recognize the fact that their knowledge of the world was far more limited than they had originally perceived. Additionally, Martin Luther was seeding the Protestant Reformation in western Europe, which would partially justify King Henry VIII's decision to break with the Catholic Church and illustrate More's clear moral and religious difficulties in accepting the movement. Essentially, this accounts for More's theoretical notion that a utopian civilization could exist somewhere in the unknown regions of the world.
"In it a traveler, Raphael Hythloday, gives an account of the people of Utopia, which he claims he encountered while journeying through the new world with Amerigo Vespucci." In many respects, the society envisioned in the work is analogous to English society; however, it is free of the corruptions, vices, and greed that More saw in his homeland. It is placed within a recognizable historical context in an effort to grant additional credence to More's notions. The book was completed in 1516, just as the Protestant Reformation officially began.
Notably, Martin Luther recognized many of the same corruptions of power that More did; however, his solution to the problem was far more practical than the critical assessment of society that More presented in Utopia. Just a year later, Luther would post his Ninety-Five Theses, revealing his position that ultimate sin can only be avoided by individual faith in the gospel, and that the Catholic Church had fundamentally lost its way. Luther's concepts identify a number of the same injustices that More relates; however, Luther offers a clearer avenue to rectification. Utopia is, in many ways, a satirical work that does little to assert the capability of any European nation to actually achieve the levels of peace and prosperity that Hythloday recalls.
In 1518 More first entered the service of King Henry VIII when he became the under-sheriff of London. From this point his political career truly took flight: he was eventually elected to the House of Commons and then appointed to the position of Lord Chancellor. In his new position, More assumed substantial responsibility and became forever linked to the political turmoil associated with the regime of Henry VIII. When the Pope formally declined the King's appeal to have his marriage to Catherine of Aragon annulled, Henry declared himself the supreme head of the Church of England. This typifies More's incongruity with Henry's political policies: "At the same time that More is vigorously pursuing heretics and even signing their death warrants, Henry is listening to Protestant arguments against the hierarchical structure of the Roman Church."
On May 16, 1533, Thomas More formally resigned as Lord Chancellor, and only a week later, "Archbishop Cranmer annulled Henry VIII's marriage to Catherine of Aragon; his marriage to Anne Boleyn was declared valid on 28 May, and on 1 June she became Queen." However, More was unable to escape Henry's authority so easily. His resignation and clerical associations made him a focal point of Henry's attention, and his refusal to sign an oath of allegiance to the King was deemed nothing short of treason. "On April 17 [1534] More is imprisoned, along with his friend Fisher, in the Tower of London. Over the last fourteen months of his life, he writes Treatise on the Passion, a Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation, and The Sadness of Christ." These works represent both his philosophical objections to the actions of the King and his faith in the healing capacity of Christ.
"On July 1 [1535] More is tried for treason, found guilty, and sentenced to be hanged, cut down while still living, his bowels pulled from his body and burned in his sight, his genitals cut off, his head as well, and his body to be quartered and put on view to the public." However, prior to the declared date of execution, fearing a possible riot from More's compatriots, Henry forestalled the subsequent torture and limited his punishment to beheading. On the date of execution More was led to the scaffold, and is reported to have requested that his beard not be severed — a final token of his supreme ironic humor. "More knelt down and the executioner offered to blind his eyes; but he refused and covered his face with a linen cloth he had carried with him.... He was killed with one stroke of the axe and, when the head had fallen into the straw, the executioner picked it up and displayed it to the crowds with the shout 'Behold the head of a traitor.'" Thus ended the life of a man who would later be canonized and revered by the Church and public alike.
Importantly, Utopia illustrates More's fundamental principles regarding religion, the Church, the ordering of society, and the human condition. Since the book was completed nearly twenty years before his death, it offers an interesting glimpse into the notions that led him to choose the path of principle over that demanded by his king. However, the book offers more than insight into the events of his life; it can be analyzed for its critical assessment of sixteenth-century European politics and practices, as well as for its quasi-communistic notions. "Whatever ideals are expressed in More's book, or lie behind it, a central paradox or contradiction is in the compromise its author has to describe between ideal and reality.... The circumstances of the book's conception and composition illustrate very well More's own situation, and, beyond the particular poignancy of some aspects of his life, the un-utopian condition of human nature in general." Overall, it is a noteworthy piece of literature for the setting out of which it arose and the fundamental problems with society that More identifies.
"Fictional characters protect More from heresy charges"
Galileo also approached a delicate subject with regard to the Church in a hypothetical and fictitious manner. He had uncovered valid and relatively conclusive evidence that the earth revolved around the sun — a discovery that directly contradicted prevailing clerical interpretations of scripture. Even though Galileo was eventually arrested by the Spanish Inquisition for his Dialogue and found guilty of "vehement suspicion of heresy," this was less a consequence of the concepts he presented than a result of his theoretical mechanism's failure. The full force of Galileo's argument was bestowed upon his best-developed character, while the position of the Church was backed by a weak and simple-minded literary creation. More, however, does not make this same mistake. The fact that he gives the proponent of European society his own name and social position necessarily hinders any possible attack from authority. This point illustrates the importance of the oppressive setting in which More found himself and explains the literary style evident in Utopia, which would doubtlessly be absent from modern interpretations of similar arguments.
Nevertheless, the character "More" cannot be confused with the person bearing the same name. Hythloday stands as the vehicle through which More is capable of presenting his assessments of society. The advancing exploration of the Americas allows Thomas More to invent both a character and a land that contrast with more traditional surroundings and people. Accordingly, More's opinions are placed in both "More" and in Hythloday: "More" reflects Thomas More's recognition that his beliefs are radical, and Hythloday reflects those unavoidably hidden, radical notions. Hythloday holds that some philosophical principles of truth and freedom must be upheld at all costs, while "More" takes the more pragmatic position that society sometimes demands that such ideals be overridden by necessity. More's historic positioning makes such blending of actual events, characters, and locations with their fictitious counterparts possible.
Utopia takes place during a diplomatic journey that More made in life as well as in the book. "More" visits his friend Peter Giles and for the first time encounters Hythloday in his presence. Raphael Hythloday is revealed to be a deep-thinking, philosophically rooted individual who has spent much of his life traveling and observing foreign cultures. The substantial distinctions between Hythloday and the traditional educated European of his day become apparent when he definitively objects to the proposal that a man of his abilities would be best suited to the service of a king.
Hythloday asserts that the objectives of kings and princes are contrary to the ultimate aims of society as he perceives them. He uses an example concerning executions to clarify his stance: "for this punishment of thieves passeth the limits of justice, and is also very hurtful to the weal-public. For it is too extreme and cruel a punishment for theft, and yet not sufficient to refrain and withhold men from theft." Hence, the accepted practices and policies of the established order are fundamentally objected to by Hythloday on the grounds that life is intrinsically more valuable than any material goods, or the laws upholding their orderly proliferation. He states, "I think it not right nor justice that the loss of money should cause the loss of man's life. For mine opinion is, that all the goods in the world are not able to countervail man's life."
Similarly, Hythloday associates the goals of kings with exploitive and materialistic means. His justification for placing life above kings, laws, and their apparent relationship to social well-being stems from the word of God. God commanded that men should not kill one another; so, the perpetuation of state-sanctioned killing reflects a key contradiction inherent to Christian kingdoms: it places the law of man in an elevated position over the law of God.
"Oversimplifications and internal contradictions in Utopia"
"More reconciles radical idealism with pragmatic tradition"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.