This paper provides a critical review of Singhry's (2015) study on the effect of supply chain technology, collaboration, and innovation capability on the performance of manufacturing companies. The review evaluates the study's problem statement, theoretical framework, hypothesis, research methodology, and findings. It notes the study's strengths — including its validated instruments, use of the Likert scale, and grounding in established structural models — while identifying limitations such as a narrow variable scope and underdeveloped real-world applications. The paper concludes that Singhry's work offers a meaningful contribution to supply chain management literature and points toward productive directions for future research.
Singhry (2015) identifies a number of issues that affect supply chain management effectiveness, and this identification serves as the problem — or gap in the literature — that the study attempts to address. The problems range from "weak corporate technological culture" to "technological paradox" (a phrase that is not defined), and the apparent issues are technology-related (Singhry, 2015, p. 259). Singhry (2015) also cites the conflicting data produced by studies examining the relationship between supply chain technology and performance. The main goal of the study is to provide a guide for improving performance in the supply chain management area.
Singhry's (2015) research is effective in its ability to address specific issues, including establishing a clear theoretical background for the study. He defines technology adequately by stating that it is a "dynamic capability," contrasting it with the concept of collaboration, which he posits is a "dynamic process." The point is that the two work together, with technology acting as the tool in the process of collaboration. The more dynamic a company is, the more likely it is to be competitive. This is a reasonable assertion in terms of establishing a framework, and it serves the purposes of the study well by providing an adequate lens through which to view the data.
The hypothesis holds that innovative capabilities are essential to the relationship between supply chain technology and performance, asserting that this previously undefined role can be clarified through the application of this study. The researcher states that "innovation capability mediates the relationship" between technology and performance (Singhry, 2015, p. 261). It is a legitimate hypothesis based on the analysis of several factors within the industry and a review of the relevant literature. It is supported by various studies and their findings, so it does not come across as mere speculation. It is sound, well-researched, and presents a satisfying thesis that is tested quantitatively using a cross-sectional survey (Singhry, 2015, p. 261).
The instruments used in the research are shown to "have been validated" by other studies, so there is no question of whether they are adequate (Singhry, 2015, p. 261). The Likert scale is used to define data — an acceptable and widely used practice — and the "construct, convergent and discriminant validities were assessed" (Singhry, 2015, p. 264). In this portion of the study, previous research was used as a guide for assessing these various validities.
Likewise, the structural model of the research was based on the work of Baron and Kenny (1986) as well as Taylor (2006), both of whom have provided adequate guidance for this type of research. The data charts and comparisons that Singhry (2015) provides support this guidance and indicate a strong quantitative assessment using a refined mathematical analysis method capable of measuring collaborative and correlative relationships between technology capabilities and performance in the supply chain mechanism.
"Confirms innovation mediates technology-performance relationship"
"Suggests broader variables and case study extensions"
Singhry's (2015) study is an effective piece of scholarship that opens the door to future possibilities. Rooted in the frameworks and models of prior researchers, Singhry focuses on a specific and fundamental connection in the field of supply chain management, demonstrating that innovation capability is a significant factor in the relationship between technology and performance. With this finding as a foundation, future research can build further and refine the supply chain mechanism toward improved real-world application.
You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.