This paper examines the application of statistical process control (SPC) in pharmaceutical manufacturing, drawing on federal regulatory guidance, industry surveys, and process analytical technology (PAT) frameworks. It outlines the legal and regulatory requirements governing pharmaceutical quality in the United States, including USP standards under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The paper describes how PAT tools support research, scale-up, and manufacturing, and presents survey data on industry adoption of continuous improvement programs such as Six Sigma and Quality by Design. It further explains how control charts distinguish common cause from special cause variation, and argues that process-focused monitoring is more effective and cost-efficient than end-product inspection alone.
The use of applied statistics in studying pharmaceutical manufacturing processes is examined in the work of Tiani (2004), who reports that healthcare quality is critically important in society and that the quality of healthcare matters to all individuals. It is important that treatment is administered accurately, and this is particularly true of medications given to patients. It is expected that "the bottle of medicine has the specified number of tablets and that each tablet contains the specified quantity of the correct drug" (Tiani, 2004).
There are legal and regulatory requirements set out in United States law mandating that medication quality be controlled within the pharmaceutical industry. The regulations are contained in federal statutes and outline "a quality control function that emphasizes inspection and defect detection, and pharmaceutical quality control technology" (Tiani, 2004). It is reported that the drug product features that are "the easiest to understand, measure, and control" are those falling under the classification of the medication's chemical or physical attributes (Tiani, 2004).
According to Tiani (2004), the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) includes "standards for drugs and pharmaceutical substances" referred to as Official Monographs. The USP standards are "official and required by law in the U.S. under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act" (Tiani, 2004).
Process Analytical Technology (PAT) has been developed to support the development of pharmaceutical manufacturing and quality assurance. There are two reported components to the PAT framework: (1) a set of scientific principles and tools supporting innovation, and (2) a strategy for regulatory implementation that will accommodate innovation (Janardhan, 2011).
Quality problems in the petrochemical industries "need to be corrected before they contaminate large volumes of products" (Janardhan, 2011). Pharmaceutical companies are reported to suffer from "excessive rework and scrap, high work-in-process, low capacity utilization, prolonged cycle times, and laboratory bottlenecks" (Janardhan, 2011). AMR research reports that the "industry average for both rework and discarded product is about 50%" and that on-hold product inventories "are at the 40 to 60 day level" (Janardhan, 2011). Plant utilization is reported as being "in the range of 40 to 50%" and average cycle times are stated to be in the 30 to 90 day range (Janardhan, 2011).
"PAT tools, process parameters, and adoption survey findings"
"Control charts, variation types, and process monitoring"
Janardhan, Pala Bashanam (2011). Pharmaceutical manufacturing: Embracing process analytical technology. Pharma Focus Asia. Retrieved from:
Moore, V. (2003). Statistical process control. Chapter 24, 9 Apr 2003. Retrieved from:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). (2011). Guidance for industry process validation: General principles and practices. Retrieved from:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Pharmaceutical Science in CDER, PAT Steering Committee. (2011). Guidance for industry PAT — A framework for innovative pharmaceutical development, manufacturing, and quality assurance. Retrieved from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm070305.pdf
You’re 30% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.