Case Study Undergraduate 1,208 words

Situational Leadership and Power Dynamics in HR Teams

~7 min read
Abstract

This paper examines the sources of power held by members of a human resources team tasked with implementing a Human Resource Information System (HRIS). Drawing on concepts such as legitimate, reward, referent, expert, informational, and network power, the paper identifies each team member's influence base and explores how their titles and positions shape team dynamics. Using the Situational Leadership Model, the paper characterizes the team's development level as D4 (self-reliant achiever) and recommends an S4 delegating leadership style. It also addresses conflict resolution through compromise and outlines specific steps — including communication, progress monitoring, and feedback — to ensure the team meets its deadline. A subsequent shift to an S1 directing style is proposed to maintain accountability.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

What makes this paper effective

  • Each team member is given a clearly labeled power type with a concise definition and specific evidence from the case, making abstract concepts concrete and easy to follow.
  • The paper applies a consistent theoretical framework — the Situational Leadership Model — across multiple questions, demonstrating coherent analytical thinking rather than isolated responses.
  • The recommendation to shift from S4 (delegating) to S1 (directing) in response to conflict shows nuanced understanding that leadership style should adapt to changing team circumstances.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates applied theory integration: it introduces each leadership or power concept with a textbook definition, then immediately maps it onto a specific individual or situation from the case. This "define-then-apply" structure is a reliable technique for case-study responses at the undergraduate level, grounding arguments in cited theory while staying grounded in the scenario.

Structure breakdown

The paper is organized as a question-and-answer case study response across seven thematic sections. It begins by cataloguing individual power sources, then broadens to team-level dynamics, development level, and leadership style selection. The final two sections pivot to problem-solving — conflict resolution and deadline management — before closing with a leadership style adjustment recommendation. Each section builds logically on the previous one, creating a coherent narrative arc from diagnosis to action plan.

Sources of Power Among Team Members

The individuals within the team each possess a distinct form of power that enables them to influence the rest of the group. First, Harry Starker possesses legitimate power. Legitimate power originates from a person's role or position within an organization (Bal et al., 2008). Individuals comply with appeals made by such persons because they recognize the legitimacy of the position, regardless of whether they personally support those appeals. In this case, Janna also holds a source of legitimate power by virtue of having worked for two decades within the company and thoroughly understanding its history (Bauer and Erdogan, 2009).

Second, Tanisha Downey possesses reward power. Reward power is the capability to provide rewards — such as salary increases, benefits, and lucrative job opportunities. As Director of HR, Tanisha has the ability to grant promotions and pay raises.

The third member, Rachel Cohen, possesses informational power. This type of power stems from having access to information that others need. As noted, Rachel is the person to consult when something needs to get done; she understands the organization and its key players (Bauer and Erdogan, 2009).

Sammy Bassanova, the fourth team member, possesses referent power. Referent power originates from a person's personal qualities and characteristics — specifically, the degree to which others admire, respect, and aspire to be like that individual. Sammy's referent power derives from his personable manner and his ease with American professional culture.

Jacqueline Chirac possesses expert power. Expert power originates from skills and specialized knowledge. Jacqueline is highly knowledgeable about the business, its markets, and its internal stakeholders. She also has extensive knowledge of European employment law (Bauer and Erdogan, 2009), has practiced HR for more than two decades, and holds a legal background as a trained attorney.

Finally, as VP of HR for the enterprise, the team leader possesses both network power and informational power. This power originates from a broad social network throughout the organization — connections that were, in fact, instrumental in attaining the current position (Bauer and Erdogan, 2009).

Impact of Titles and Positions on Team Dynamics

The different titles and positions held by team members have a meaningful influence on team dynamics, both internally and externally. The Directors of Human Resources for the Southern, European, and Western European operations are positioned to ensure that all employee records and HR information can be accessed from the relevant regional offices, enabling smooth integration into the HRIS.

As an attorney, Jacqueline Chirac can provide legal advice and guidance related to the incorporation of the HRIS into the organization. Her familiarity with European employment law is particularly valuable in setting up the new system. Harry Starker and Rachel Cohen, having been with the organization for twenty and fifteen years respectively, can provide indispensable institutional knowledge and a comprehensive understanding of organizational history.

As VP of HR, the team leader plans to employ a participative style of leadership. By sharing authority, expertise, and influence, the aim is to foster innovation, motivation, and momentum within the team — all of which will be critical to ensuring the HRIS goes live within six months. The team's combined skills and competencies position them to be a source of mutual inspiration and creative problem-solving.

With the exception of Sammy Bassanova, who has been a director for approximately two years, all other members of the team — including the team leader — have more than five years of human resources experience. This reflects not only a high level of competence and proficiency, but also strong commitment to the organization.

Team Development Level Under the Situational Leadership Model

In accordance with the Situational Leadership Model, the team's development level is best characterized as D4 — the self-reliant achiever. This designation is appropriate because the team members demonstrate both high competence and high commitment to the organization.

In accordance with the Situational Leadership Model, the most fitting leadership style for this team is S4 — delegating. This style is appropriate because all team members bring extensive and comprehensive experience in human resources and possess a strong understanding of the organization's history and culture. As a result, they do not require coaching or close direction, given their existing knowledge and expertise in the field (Bass and Stogdill, 1990). S4 is therefore selected because it is reasonable to delegate responsibilities to these individuals with confidence that tasks will be completed efficiently and competently.

4 Locked Sections · 520 words remaining
58% of this paper shown

Most Appropriate Leadership Style for the Team · 110 words

"S4 delegating style recommended for experienced team"

Resolving Team Conflicts Through Compromise · 100 words

"Compromise approach chosen to balance competing concerns"

Steps to Ensure the Team Meets Its Deadline · 155 words

"Communication, monitoring, and feedback as key steps"

Adjusting Leadership Style to Address Emerging Challenges · 155 words

"Shift to S1 directing style to maintain accountability"

Sign Up Now — Instant AccessAlready a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examplesAI writing assistantCitation generatorCancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
Situational Leadership Power Sources HRIS Implementation D4 Development Level S4 Delegating S1 Directing Referent Power Expert Power Conflict Resolution Team Dynamics
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Situational Leadership and Power Dynamics in HR Teams. PaperDue. https://paperdue.com/study-guide/situational-leadership-power-dynamics-hr-team-2157816

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.