This book review examines Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter as a landmark work of American literature. The review covers the novel's central narrative of adultery, guilt, and social condemnation in 17th-century Puritan New England, as well as its rich symbolism and psychological complexity. The paper also situates the novel within Hawthorne's biographical and historical context, analyzes the significance of "The Custom House" prologue, and considers how the three main characters — Hester Prynne, Arthur Dimmesdale, and Roger Chillingworth — embody the destructive demands of rigid moral frameworks. The review concludes by reflecting on the novel's enduring relevance across 150 years of literary criticism.
The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne is a sensuous and touching account of a woman named Hester Prynne. It also includes a prologue titled "The Custom House" that briefly prepares the reader for what is to follow. The significance and detail of "The Custom House" will be addressed later in this review. The underlying subtle criticism of the Puritan mindset, profound symbolism, and vivid imagery — all beautifully woven together — make this book an enduring asset to the world of American literature.
The Scarlet Letter is the story of a minister, Arthur Dimmesdale, who is helplessly in love with Hester Prynne, a married woman who comes to America to settle down while her husband in England was supposed to join her later. Dimmesdale and Hester become lovers, and a baby named Pearl is born from their union. As was the tradition prevalent in 17th-century American society, Hester is put on public display and forced to wear a robe with the letter "A" — marking her as an adulteress — rather than disclose the name of her lover. Dimmesdale, on the other hand, is unable to submit himself wholly to his desires and is continually tormented by his inability to acknowledge his lover.
The way Hawthorne highlights the fallibility of human nature, and the fortitude required to accept that fallibility, is commendable. The choices we make in life are part of a larger picture, and every human being has the right to be human. A society that sets its moral and religious ideals so high that it eliminates the possibility of human error should reconsider the significance of those ideals. Hawthorne is also to be praised for his audacity: in the 19th century, writing something that exposed the sensuous desires of man and his urge to succumb to the throes of passion was unheard of — not to mention unacceptable to society at large.
In order to understand the significance of Hawthorne's work in The Scarlet Letter, it is essential to examine the background in which it was written. Nathaniel Hawthorne was visibly distinct from other authors of his time, being extensively and meaningfully engaged with the issues of his era. He chose to write on a topic dreaded by even the most established writers of his day, and although he never expected his work to be widely acknowledged, the booming success of The Scarlet Letter not only surprised him but also made clear that Americans were ready to discuss previously stigmatized issues. When the novel took its place among the most respected works of American literature, that readiness was further reinforced.
During the 19th century, the issues of slavery and the mistreatment of women occupied center stage. Although Hawthorne never strictly condemned slavery, he disapproved of it and believed it would in time die a natural death. It would therefore be incorrect to think of The Scarlet Letter as a work disconnected from its social moment. It is a depiction of 17th-century conditions in which no man or woman could achieve happiness, since they were never able to rise to the level expected of them by Puritan society. Through his writing, Hawthorne aimed to bring about an invisible but gradual change — believing that instantaneous changes are seldom permanent. He targeted individuals through the novel and tried to cultivate in them a need to reconsider the strict and uncompromising treatment of human faults, particularly those of women.
Hawthorne was himself a devoted father, husband, and son, and this tale of adultery has no direct connection to his personal life. However, a closer look reveals an uncanny resemblance between certain life incidents and those depicted in the novel. Hester's act — gaining a child but losing its father — is reminiscent of the author's own situation, having grown up with only his widowed mother after his father died of yellow fever at sea. Hawthorne began writing The Scarlet Letter when his mother died and ended it with the death of Hester Prynne. He transformed elements of his real-life circumstances into the story, infusing them with guilt. He also appears to have viewed his father's untimely death as a consequence of political failure — inadequate precautionary and hygiene measures at sea and faulty trade relations in the Caribbean, both of which he believed could have been averted by proper political action.
To omit a discussion of the psychological significance of The Scarlet Letter would be a great injustice to Hawthorne's artistry. The portion of the novel dealing with Hester's husband, Chillingworth, and Dimmesdale's gradual recognition of each other's identity provides a crucial window into Dimmesdale's inner world. Without Chillingworth, a true look into Dimmesdale's heart would be impossible. The inner torment and continuous battle against his conscience caused Dimmesdale enormous distress, and his guilt finally led him to break down during a sermon — tearing his robe open to reveal the letter "A" carved into his flesh.
In The Scarlet Letter, the author concentrates primarily on character and explores how society shapes the way individuals respond to circumstances. Hester tempts Dimmesdale in the forest; she is a free spirit with an urge to explore the world, test its limitations, and surrender to exciting temptations, whatever the consequences may be. She is far more carefree — and in a way more naive — than Minister Arthur Dimmesdale, who has learned only to abide by the laws of society and God and cannot imagine a life beyond them. Yet as he interacts with a free spirit like Hester, the innate desire for love and passion that he had long suppressed suddenly surfaces. Those feelings grow so powerful that he commits what Puritan society considers the ultimate sin of passion, and before long the guilt of his inability to atone for it takes his life. Dimmesdale, then, is a man defined not by principle but by passion — pitted against a Puritan mindset that knows nothing of passion and is bound only by principles.
Chillingworth, by contrast, is driven by cold-blooded revenge. In his obsessive desire to avenge himself, desperation ultimately destroys him entirely. Thus all three characters — Hester, Dimmesdale, and Chillingworth — demonstrate how the Puritan social framework shapes and distorts responses to the most fundamental human emotions: passion, anger, guilt, and resentment. The style of the novel is refreshing and real. Although its overall message is somber, it also projects an image of strength and pride through Hester, who chooses banishment from her society so that she may freely embrace her decision to love the man and bear his child. In a sense, she is also relieved, for as a marked adulteress she is no longer bound by the rigid expectations of Puritan morality.
"Prologue's role in personalizing the narrative"
"Novel's survival through 150 years of criticism"
You’re 71% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.