This paper examines whether scandal and controversy in professional and collegiate sports produce any lasting benefits for the industry. Drawing on cases including the 1919 Black Sox scandal, Lance Armstrong's doping admission, Kobe Bryant's sexual assault charge, and NCAA eligibility controversies, the paper surveys how sponsors, administrators, athletes, and fans respond to negative publicity. It reviews academic literature on group identification, endorser trust, and sports marketing to argue that scandals can revitalize audience interest, rehabilitate athlete images, and expose systemic problems—such as the failure to compensate college athletes—that ultimately demand corrective reform.
Sports in the United States is a multi-billion-dollar industry. Companies try to engage with clients by aligning the services and products they offer with this well-known industry through sports funding and endorsement. The benefit of this involvement has been well-documented in the sports marketing literature (Hughes and Shank, 2005). The effect on business brands when a scandal surfaces involving an athletic figure — such as a player, coach, or team — is, however, less well understood. Several sports scandals, including the rape case involving Kobe Bryant and the University of Colorado recruitment scandal, raise serious questions about the effect of sports scandals on amateur and professional athletic institutions, participants, sponsors, and other stakeholders.
Whereas conventional corporate sports supporters like Nike maintain omnipresence, several other types of organizations are entering the sponsorship arena. Sixty-five different organizations representing categories ranging from railroads to athletic wear sponsored the 2004 United States Olympic team at various levels (Hughes and Shank, 2005). These corporations benefit from providing teams with funding or equipment in exchange for the right to use their connection with the team in commercial activities and promotions. There are, however, various risks associated with sponsorship. What happens to a sponsor and their brand, for instance, when a scandal erupts involving an athletic endorser?
Sports matches have always been accompanied by some form of gambling ever since the existence of professional sporting events. Going all the way back to the 1919 World Series, point shaving and match fixing have diluted the purity of sporting competition. Various athletes found guilty of illegal or immoral behavior participated in these schemes merely to earn extra money. Others were driven by addiction to gambling, alcohol, or drugs. These scandals are not restricted to athletes alone (Alessi, 2014). NBA referee Tim Donaghy lost his job after being found guilty of leaking inside information; an NHL assistant coach accepted bets from players; and MLB coaches have been found guilty of stealing money to pay off gambling debts.
With the globalization of sports, placing a bet on a professional sporting event has become increasingly simple. Worldwide, the sports betting industry has grown to nearly 500 billion dollars per year, with more than 90% of European bets placed on European football matches.
Since the 1960s, the use of performance-enhancing drugs has been an issue in both collegiate and professional sports. Performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) include human growth hormones, stimulants, anabolic steroids, and supplements such as androstenedione, which assist the body in producing testosterone and thereby boosting physical performance. The fight against PEDs has been a long struggle. Lance Armstrong was stripped of his Olympic medal and Tour de France titles after admitting to doping throughout his career (Keller, 2013). Major League Baseball sued Biogenesis of America, resulting in the temporary ban of twenty players, including Miguel Tejada of the Kansas City Royals, Alex Rodriguez of the New York Yankees, and Ryan Braun of the Milwaukee Brewers.
In the agent-athlete relationship, corruption is quite common. According to John Phillips, founder of Breakthrough Sports Agency, nearly half of all agents are willing to do whatever it takes to sign a player. Because a sports agent's earnings are based on a percentage of the contract salary they negotiate for an athlete, the temptation to bend the rules to sign the best talent is significant.
Discrimination also takes many forms in sport. Homophobia, racism, and gender discrimination are social justice concerns that affect a wide array of sectors in society, including the sporting world. While overt racism in the way sports clubs conduct their business has diminished, racism persists in sports, with individual athletes, commentators, and fans now responsible for most racist incidents (Keller, 2013). Illicit gambling, by contrast, is less prevalent in the United States than in other parts of the world — a scarcity that may be linked to how past scandals have been handled. The eight members of the Chicago White Sox who participated in the notorious rigging of the 1919 World Series were banned from the sport for life.
"How scandals can revitalize leagues and athlete brands"
"NCAA eligibility scandals and compensation arguments"
The repercussions for both sports sponsors and administrators suggest that character matters in how a potentially scandalous event is evaluated. Efforts by sponsors and administrators to reduce the likelihood of unethical and illegal behavior would be helpful in protecting the integrity of both the organization and its brand (Hughes and Shank, 2005). Developing hiring and recruitment practices that emphasize character, for instance, can meaningfully reduce the risk of scandal.
You’re 36% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.