This paper examines two essays β Judy Brady's "I Want a Wife" and William Lutz's "Life Under the Chief Doublespeak Officer" β through the lens of descriptive writing patterns and rhetorical technique. The analysis explores how Brady employs first-person narration, satire, and irony to critique patriarchal gender roles in traditional marriage, and how Lutz uses formal argumentation and concrete examples to expose the prevalence and social harm of doublespeak in advertising and public communication. The paper also reflects on how each author's techniques can inform persuasive personal writing.
In her essay I Want a Wife, Judy Brady uses satire and sarcasm to critique gender roles in traditional marriage relationships. To achieve her goals, the author writes in first person, specifically from the perspective of someone who lists the qualities she wants β or expects β in a wife. Rather than composing in a standard essay or narrative format, Brady creates a list of reasons why she wants a wife. This literary technique is compelling because it allows the author to deliver a sharp criticism of patriarchy in a lighthearted and humorous manner.
The reasons the narrator lists for wanting a wife include having someone who will work and take care of the children, attend to all of her physical needs including maintaining a clean house and preparing home-cooked meals, and who will not complain. The wife will also assume all responsibility for birth control, always give in to sexual demands, and be willing to tolerate infidelity. "Who wouldn't want a wife?" is the essay's final sentence, leaving the reader to understand why men have historically been reluctant to relinquish their positions of power in domestic relationships.
Brady uses the first-person technique expertly and without allowing the essay to become too personal or self-centered. As a result, the author speaks for all women who have found themselves in a situation similar to the one described, contemplating the inequalities inherent in domestic partnerships. Brady uses these specific literary techniques as a way of directly relating to her audience.
In addition to first-person singular narration, the use of irony, satire, and sarcasm are central to the essay. The satire of the traditional marriage relationship highlights the main points, just as the author's choice to use a list-based structure rather than a conventional essay form reinforces the cumulative, exhausting nature of the expectations placed on wives.
Using first person and a satirical approach allows Brady to accomplish a powerful social goal. By combining satire with first-person narration, she avoids excessive self-focus and directs attention toward social commentary instead. By describing why she wants a wife, the author is able to show how patriarchal standards of marriage have placed women in a position of domestic servitude. Rather than employing a more direct argumentative style β which might cause the audience to become defensive β the author demonstrates how the male partner benefits from the patriarchal system of marriage while the woman does not.
The descriptive writing pattern Brady uses allows for rich and specific detail. For instance, she writes: "When I meet people at school that I like and want to entertain, I want a wife who will have the house clean, will prepare a special meal, serve it to me and my friends, and not interrupt when I talk about things that interest me and my friends." The implication is that the husband reaps the social benefits of hosting friends without performing the behind-the-scenes labor that makes it possible. Ultimately, I Want a Wife achieves its goal of drawing attention to an important social justice issue.
"Lutz defines and illustrates doublespeak's harm"
"Logos-driven persuasion without emotional appeals"
Both Brady and Lutz demonstrate that effective persuasive writing does not require inflammatory language or heavy emotional appeals. Instead, carefully chosen examples and well-deployed rhetorical devices β whether satire and irony, as in Brady's case, or logical enumeration, as in Lutz's β can deliver sharp and lasting social commentary. These techniques offer valuable models for any writer seeking to engage an audience on issues of inequality, dishonesty, or social injustice.
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.