The Case for Reelecting George W. Bush: Pros and Cons

Introduction: An Unconventional Path to the Presidency

George W. Bush became president under some of the most unusual circumstances in U.S. history, with the legitimacy of his claim to victory a matter of heated public debate (Mansfield, 2003). Despite the highly contested 2000 presidential election that brought him to power, Bush came into office motivated and ready to act, surprising many of his critics with a successful early push for tax reduction and other domestic initiatives. However, the shattering events of September 11, 2001 forced the Bush administration to change the focus of its agenda. Since that day, the power of the presidency — as well as its limitations — has been criticized and praised by the public and the media.

George W. Bush is the 43rd President of the United States (Mansfield, 2003). He was elected in 2001 after a campaign in which he outlined sweeping proposals to reform America's public schools, transform national defense, provide tax relief, modernize Social Security and Medicare, and encourage faith-based and community organizations to work with government to help those in need.

Bush's Domestic Agenda and Early Achievements

Since taking office, President Bush passed several initiatives to improve public schools by raising standards, requiring accountability, and strengthening local control. He signed tax relief legislation that provided rebate checks and lower tax rates for all Americans who pay income taxes. He increased pay and benefits for the military and worked to save and strengthen Social Security and Medicare. He was also committed to ushering in what he called a "responsibility era" in America.

The terrorist attacks of September 11th changed America forever (Mansfield, 2003). Bush declared war against terror and achieved some victories in that effort. He launched a war in the Middle East, despite overwhelming protests from the American public. The Bush administration also asked Congress to approve a series of laws it stated were necessary to prosecute the war on terror. These included various surveillance programs, some of which came under heavy fire from civil liberties groups who criticized the administration for scaling back civil liberties.

September 11 and the War on Terror

On the other hand, the administration was also criticized for refusing to back certain security measures — allocating no funds for port security in 2003 and 2004, and vetoing all $39 million for the Container Security Initiative.

While Bush undoubtedly benefited the United States in many ways during his presidency, many argued that he was one of the worst leaders in history. Supporters retorted that he was simply adhering to his conservative principles by doing everything in his power to protect his constituents. With so many proponents and opponents of Bush's reelection, it was difficult to determine whether he would win a second term. However, there was no doubt that national security was foremost in the minds of Americans as the election approached.

Conclusion: Security, Conviction, and the Road Ahead

America is on the forefront of confronting terrorism, led currently by a president who has strayed from his base on occasion, but who nonetheless remains true to his convictions where it counts — protecting U.S. citizens.