This paper examines the fundamental differences between public and private budgeting, with particular attention to the philosophical underpinnings of public finance, the role of taxpayers in funding government programs, and the accountability standards that govern governmental accounting. The paper discusses the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and its Statement 34, which requires transparent financial reporting for government entities. It also considers citizen involvement in the budgeting process, drawing on scholarly perspectives to evaluate the relationship between government budgeting practices and public financial reporting.
Whether widely recognized or not, public (or governmental) budgeting differs fundamentally from non-governmental budgeting. Public budgeting is primarily concerned with the sustainability of programs, whereas private budgeting is more focused on maximizing profits while minimizing losses.
The philosophy behind public finance concerns financial matters relating to government — specifically taxation among local, state, and federal government entities. The government relies on taxpayers to fund its various programs and agencies. At times, funds are moved from one program to another to keep a program operational, or budgets may be reduced when sufficient funds are unavailable. Public finance depends greatly on taxpayers, and when revenues appear insufficient, taxes may be increased. It has been argued that the entire process of taxation is inherently unfair because, even though the sales tax rate is the same for everyone, those with lower incomes pay a higher proportion of their salaries in taxes than those with higher incomes (McGee, 2004).
Private finance, by contrast, does not rely on taxpayers at all. Businesses generate revenue from customers rather than from public funds. They operate on a profit-and-loss philosophy and may go public — selling shares of stock — in order to maintain profitability. If a company is not profitable, it does not have the option to borrow funds from another agency or raise revenues the way governments can in order to keep their entities afloat.
Government accounting differs from nongovernmental accounting because it is grounded in accountability, whereas nongovernmental accounting is more focused on financial profitability. Because government agencies use taxpayer money to operate, their accounting practices must ensure transparency and answerability to the public. Government agencies are required to follow the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB); Statement No. 34 of these standards addresses government financial reporting specifically. According to Fickes, GASB 34 transformed traditional government accounting to give readers of government financial reports a more accurate and complete picture of government operations (2002). Private accounting firms do not follow these standards because they are not accountable to taxpayers in the same way.
The government cannot act arbitrarily when it comes to budgeting and financial reporting. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board exists precisely to ensure discipline and consistency in this process. Accurate budgeting is essential for reliable financial reporting of government operations. The relationship between government budgeting and financial reporting is that sound budgeting keeps financial activity transparent and discourages conduct that would not withstand public scrutiny. Knowing that budgets can and will be made available to the public holds those responsible for preparing them accountable for their actions.
Kloby suggests there may be greater incentive for budgeting accountability if citizens were involved in the budgeting process from the very beginning, rather than learning about it only after financial reporting has occurred (2009). This idea has both merits and drawbacks: citizens may lack the specialized knowledge required for government budgeting and may offer recommendations based on intuition rather than expertise. It may therefore be preferable to leave budgeting decisions to trained professionals and trust that they are adhering to established standards. When everything is conducted properly, financial reporting should be straightforward. Any irregularities will be identified during the financial reporting process.
Public budgeting is fundamentally distinct from private finance in its emphasis on accountability to taxpayers and adherence to established standards such as those set by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. While debates about citizen participation in the budgeting process remain relevant, the overriding concern in public finance is transparency and stewardship of public funds — obligations that have no direct equivalent in the private sector.
You’re 90% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.