This paper presents a Price Negotiation Memorandum (PNM) for the U.S. Department of Defense acquisition of an upgraded H-19 Mission Computer and Operational Flight Programs for the H-19A helicopter. The document outlines the government's prenegotiation objectives against the contractor Malahy Aero Systems' (MAS) proposed costs, identifies questioned and unsupported costs across all major cost elements — including materials, labor, overhead, other direct costs, and G&A expense — and establishes the government's fair and reasonable price objective. The analysis draws on DCAA audit findings, forward pricing rate agreements, stratified sampling, and applicable FAR and DFARS provisions to arrive at a final government price objective of $43,871,896.
This document presents the Price Negotiation Memorandum (PNM) for the acquisition of the H-19 Mission Computer and the Operational Flight Programs for the H-19A helicopter. The Department of Defense intends to upgrade both the H-19 Mission Computer and the Operational Flight Programs of the H-19A. The H-19A helicopter is designed to meet Army troop carrier and ground support requirements. The H-19 currently also supports the U.S. Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, Department of the Interior, and Coast Guard, and is used in peacekeeping operations.
However, the H-19 requires significant improvements in speed, range, and load capabilities. Malahy Aero Systems (MAS) is the sole prime contractor selected to fulfill this acquisition. The government and MAS have agreed to complete the contract within 19 months.
The negotiation team includes the following government representatives:
The negotiation is between the government and Malahy Aero Systems, the contractor responsible for upgrading the H-19A helicopter's computer system. The contractor submitted total proposed costs of $43,868,081 to complete the 19-month project. The government's objective was $37,659,750. Despite this variance, the contractor recorded a 12% profit of $4,519,170.
The contractor's accounting systems, material management systems, and related internal controls are considered adequate, with low control risk. The contractor records both direct and indirect employee labor, and the labor accounting system and its internal controls are assessed as adequate and low-risk.
However, the pricing and cost data supporting the proposed materials are inadequate because their preparation does not conform to applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) provisions and Cost Accounting Standards. Furthermore, the contractor has not provided adequate documentation to substantiate its position. In this memorandum, "questioned costs" refers to costs that may not be allowable or properly allocated to the contract, while "unsupported costs" refers to costs that appear allowable and allocable but for which the documentation provided is insufficient to substantiate the proposed dollar amounts.
The contractor uses the following cost elements in its proposal: Material, Material Overhead, Engineering Labor, Engineering Overhead, Manufacturing Labor, Manufacturing Overhead, Other Direct Costs (ODC), G&A, and Cost of Money. A variance exists between the contractor's cost data and the government's objective. The contractor's total proposed price is $49,110,651, while the government's objective is $43,871,896, representing a variance of $5,238,755.
The following table summarizes the government's objective price for each cost element:
The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audited the proposal upon receipt during development of the "H-19 Helicopter Mission Computer Enhancement." In the government's assessment, the pricing and cost data in the proposal are adequate for negotiation purposes. However, the data submitted to support the materials are inadequate because they were not prepared in accordance with applicable Cost Accounting Standards and the appropriate provisions of FAR and DFARS. The audit report is qualified pending the DCAA's receipt of the technical report.
"Detailed justification for each cost element objective"
"G&A pool and rate analysis for Malahy and Galbraith"
"Final government price objective and profit determination"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.