This paper provides a practical overview of implementing a peer coaching program for teachers at the school level. Drawing on foundational literature by Robbins, Marzano, and Diaz-Maggioli, it explains what peer coaching is, why it differs from traditional mentoring, and how it fosters collegiality among both novice and experienced educators. The paper addresses key implementation steps: recruiting volunteer teachers, training them in clinical cycles, matching coaching pairs by experience or teaching style, scheduling initial observation rounds, and maintaining administrative oversight. The central argument is that peer coaching is a mutual, non-evaluative professional development strategy that improves classroom quality for students while reducing the professional isolation teachers commonly experience.
Peer coaching gives both beginning and experienced teachers an additional professional support system and emotional safety net. During what is proving an increasingly difficult — as well as rewarding — era for the teaching profession in the 21st century, it is necessary that teachers feel they have somewhere to turn to enrich their classroom skills, discuss potential problems, and find solutions to the challenges facing modern educators. Peer coaching is a confidential process through which two or more professional colleagues work together to mutually reflect on their current educational practices. They expand, refine, and build new skills together; share ideas; teach one another; frequently aid one another in conducting classroom research; and simply help one another solve workplace problems, such as difficulties with challenging students or parents (Robbins, 1991).
It must be stressed that peer coaching does not necessarily imply that one person in such a collaborative relationship holds a different status. It is true that in some peer coaching relationships, a less experienced educator who is still developing basic pedagogical strategies and approaches can have the opportunity to routinely consult with a more seasoned colleague. The two can critique different teaching practices and approaches, as well as observe one another's classrooms. However, peer coaching is not simply an instructional strategy for the developing teacher — a kind of addendum to the mentoring relationship found in student teaching. Peer coaching's ultimate objective is to promote collegiality and support among faculty members. It may provide a source of connection and advice between newer and more experienced teachers, but it can also bring fresh enthusiasm and innovative teaching methods to veteran educators. In peer coaching, the exchange is mutual rather than directive, which distinguishes it from the typical student-teaching relationship (Robbins, 1991).
Even teachers of the same level and years of experience can enter into a peer coaching relationship — the coaching exists between peers, not between a teacher and a student. Furthermore, for teachers who are reluctant about being monitored, it should be emphasized that the goal of the program is not to watch over teachers, but rather, through a sharing of information, to help ensure quality teaching for all students and to develop the skills of every teacher. As Theodore Sizer observed, "The reality is that a teacher has the same 'rank' in his or her last year of teaching as the first" (cited in Robbins, 1991).
"Why peer coach?" is often the first question asked by potential volunteer teachers. Unlike many other professions, teaching can be deeply isolating. No one outside the classroom fully knows what a teacher struggles through with a particular group of students within the confines of those four walls. Even occasional national teacher conferences do not allow educators to enter into the day-to-day environment of classroom teaching alongside a fellow colleague. Peer coaching within a school therefore allows teachers to work together professionally, eliminating feelings of total isolation. As teachers are asked to do more and more by demanding parents and administrators, peer coaching further fosters collaboration and mutual support throughout the school building. Importantly, the purpose of peer coaching is not to judge colleagues, but to encourage mutual reflection and analysis of teaching practice. It promotes specific, sustained feedback over time rather than the fleeting impression left by an occasional visit from a principal (Robbins, 1991).
Teachers can be matched according to experience level, pairing a less experienced educator with a more seasoned one. However, they can also be matched within subject areas or across disciplines — for example, pairing an English teacher with a History teacher in a high school setting. This approach fosters cross-fertilization of different disciplinary methods and perspectives. Another potential pairing strategy involves a workshop period during which teachers complete a series of assessments and exercises to identify their individual teaching styles.
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.